Skip to comments."Yes Minister", St. Edward’s And The Empty Peace (Yes, Minister Flashback)
Posted on 04/11/2014 7:52:36 PM PDT by goldstategop
No devotee of Yes Minister, yesteryears BBCs classic, can forget St. Edwards Hospital that spanking new cutting edge facility that had no patients or medical personnel. Nonetheless, St. Edwards hustled and bustled, a veritable hive of activity and creative energy. For 15-months since its much-ballyhooed inauguration, an administrative staff of 500 bureaucrats filled the hospitals offices, pushed papers and generated red tape.
Sounds exaggerated? A bit over-the-top for real life? Not really. John Kerrys peace project, for example, replicates the parodys blueprints with mind-blowing precision. It is for diplomacy what St. Edwards was for health care an incredible lot of much-ado about absolutely nothing.
The biggest snag in Kerrys persistent peace offensive is that it lacks the commonsense basic essentials to even begin to achieve what it was promoted to do. It couldnt possibly live up to the hype. St Edwards couldnt heal the sick because none had been admitted. No doctors or nurses were on hand either. It was a hospital in name only.
Kerrys peace process is a process in name only. It featured no negotiations between seekers of peace. Indeed there was no one who wanted what Kerry tried to ram through, just as no one got treatment at the hospital with no patients. Kerry and his crew engaged in frenetic shuttles just as the hospitals ancillary staffers busied themselves self-importantly.
In both cases no good came of it and no good could come of it. The prodigious hum and buzz benefited no one. There was no reality behind the façade.
Kerrys peacemaking affectation depended on there being actual peacemakers. But the last thing any Palestinian honcho could afford was to strike any sort of a deal. If Arafat couldnt do it at Camp David back in 2000 (despite Ehud Baraks unprecedented concessions), surely Mahmoud Abbas couldnt do it now. Abbass last-minute dodge is no different from Arafats hasty skedaddle from the talks that Americas then-President Bill Clinton fervently fostered.
Like Arafat, who was immeasurably more powerful, Abbas doesnt want to end the conflict and be saddled with a puny Palestinian state. His aim is to discredit, delegitimize, destabilize and eventually destroy the Jewish state (which he significantly refuses to recognize).
Thats why he disdainfully rebuffed Ehud Olmerts egregious largesse at Annapolis in 2007. No Israeli concession no matter how generous can ever be good enough when compromise isnt the real Palestinian endgame but the barely disguised means to achieve the reverse of insincere pledges.
The in-your-face extortion practiced by Abbas didnt simply attest to an insatiable appetite. It was an effort to stymie Kerrys entire undertaking, to put up obstacles so outrageous that no one could possibly surmount them. To Abbass shock and dismay, however, his Israeli interlocutors proved to be softer soft-touches than he conceivably imagined.
Abbas could never have anticipated that Kerry would so stanchly side with the Palestinian Authority and essentially function as its accomplice in squeezing and duping Israel. The American Secretary of State repeatedly threatened Israel with petrifying BDS (Boycott/Divestment/Sanctions) punishment. He also offered one shriveled carrot belatedly freeing Jonathan Pollard, whos anyway soon up for parole and who by any criteria should have been liberated long ago.
The idea of exchanging Pollard for sadistic mass-murders isnt just morally repugnant. It also substantiates suspicion that Pollard is kept behind bars as a bargaining chip. Erstwhile American Special Envoy to the Middle East, Dennis Ross, owned up that he had recommended using Pollard as a quasi-hostage to be held for ransom. Simple justice was evidently out of the equation in this case.
In his 2004 book The Missing Peace, Ross quotes himself as telling Clinton at the 1998 Wye Summit (p.438) that I was in favor of his [Pollards] release, believing that he had received a harsher sentence than others who had committed comparable crimes. I preferred not tying his release to any agreement, but if that was what we were going to do, then I favored saving it for permanent status.
Get it? Pollard, as an asset of statecraft, should not be squandered on any interim arrangement but reserved for the bigger barter transaction official Washingtons variation on the human-trafficking theme.
Clearly, then, the notion of trading Pollard isnt new. This leads us, on the eve of Passover to ponder one more Seder-like how-is-this-different question. How is this recent Pollard sweetener different from the sweetener dangled under Netanyahus nose 16 years ago?
Actually its not very different. In both cases American higher-ups considered it fine and dandy for the Land of the Free to use a trapped human being as leverage in diplomatic haggling.
If any scintilla of dissimilarity does present itself, its that Clinton did take Rosss advice and wasnt ready to let go of his valuable pawn for a partial solution. Kerry, in contrast, is less slick than Clinton but far more cynical and desperate. In his pushy officious way, Kerry was gung-ho to go for broke merely to prolong talks about talks nothing more. The aim was to prop-up the frail façade. It was clear that no real talks will materialize and that the non-talks wont produce results.
All this surely bedeviled Abbas.
Kerry intimidated and enticed the Israeli side far beyond anything that Abbas could foresee and, worse yet from Abbass vantage point, the Israelis kept giving in. No matter how preposterous the demands he pressed, the malleable Israelis kept yielding bit by painful bit. It must have been maddeningly frustrating for Abbas as he sought pretexts to back out.
Finally, having apparently had enough, Abbas decided to just blindside everyone and bail out from Kerrys version of the empty St. Edwards. His escape hatch consisted of a televised spectacle in which he signed applications for state-like membership in 15 international organizations, at least a dozen of them affiliated with the UN.
*These applications were then ceremoniously delivered to Robert Serry, the United Nations Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process and Paul Garnier, the permanent representative of Switzerland to the United Nations.
Abbass part of the initial bargain last year was to refrain from unilateral moves to win international recognition during the course of the peace talks. It wasnt anything irreversible and was likely to be reneged upon as soon as Israel stopped forking over shakedown payments or as soon as the duration of the current chinwag was over.
It was a sham concession eminently fitting a sham peace process.
In a sense, Israel never paid to keep the talks going but to keep Abbas from going to the UN. That, predictably, was a fools choice the postponement of the inevitable. Sooner or later Abbas was sure to do just what he temporarily desisted from doing and what Israel attempted to dissuade him from doing for a little negligible while longer.
Its hard to figure what could in the long run be gained from putting things off. Odds are that absolutely nothing. Indisputably, Israels gain from releasing convicted mass-murderers was a sham gain eminently fitting a sham peace process.
As in St. Edwards, nothing is what it seems.
And thus, fantastically, Kerry tried to save face by insisting with a barefaced disregard for the truth that the outfits the PA applied to join werent associated with the UN and that therefore it hadnt technically broken its commitments.
Let me make it absolutely clear, he declared at a Brussels press conference, None of the agencies that President Abbas signed involve the UN. None of them And President Abbas has given his word to me that he will keep his agreement and that he intends to negotiate through the end of the month of April.
It was a sham assertion, eminently fitting a sham peace process.
Kerrys bogus deadpan pedantry rang as true as that of the fictional Sir Humphrey Appleby, the Permanent Secretary for the Department for Administrative Affairs. When his minister, Jim Hacker, demanded that St. Edwards be closed, Humphrey was downright flabbergasted: Why should we close a hospital just because it has no patients? We dont disband the Army just because there isnt a war.
Humphrey was indignant at the very assumption that the staff have nothing to do, simply because there are no patients there. And to prove his point he promptly rattled off all of the hospitals ongoing operations: Contingency Planning Department, Data and Research Department, Finance, Purchasing Department, Technical Department, Building Department, Maintenance, Catering, Personnel, Administration. It was a mere unfortunate hitch that due to government cutbacks at that time, there was no money left for the medical services.
Another sham vindication of a sham, as eminently befits sham priorities.
Still, every downside has an upside. St. Edwards was judged one of the best-run hospitals in the country. It was a candidate for the Florence Nightingale award which is given to the most hygienic hospital in the region. All of which upheld the contention that leaving patients out of a hospital can be a very good thing in some ways. Prolongs its life. Cuts down running costs.
The same can be said about a peace process with no prospects. Its easier to dicker than to preserve a peace that one prime participant (Abbas) patently does not want. If we listen carefully, we could almost hear Sir Humphrey making the case for pointless palaver.
The longevity of the process, he would be sure to point out, is almost limitless especially since the other prime participant (Netanyahu) positively dreads the collapse of the non-negotiations.
Suckers may convince themselves that theyre actually being sensible and that their accommodating spirit will score them PR brownie points. It wont. Cold hard evidence, though, wont keep incorrigible suckers from paying through the nose to keep the sham going.
In our circumstances this foremost means sustaining the sham that a peace partner at all exists, that Kerry is an honest broker and that the international community appreciates the suckers self-sacrifice.
But all isnt doom and gloom. Theres a bright side to futility. In the words of Sir Humphrey (with which Kerry would doubtless heartily concur), we dont measure our success by results but by activity.
As Sarah Honig brilliantly points out here, the so-called peace process is as much of a running joke as an insult to the human intelligence as in the famous empty hospital named St. Edwards in "Yes, Minister" - which is a comedic monument to bureaucratic stupidity:
"No devotee of Yes Minister, yesteryears BBCs classic, can forget St. Edwards Hospital that spanking new cutting edge facility that had no patients or medical personnel. Nonetheless, St. Edwards hustled and bustled, a veritable hive of activity and creative energy. For 15-months since its much-ballyhooed inauguration, an administrative staff of 500 bureaucrats filled the hospitals offices, pushed papers and generated red tape."
Yup, such utter tomfoolery as Sir Humphrey pushes in the form of an empty hospital on his hapless Minister so have Obama and Kerry pushed a nonsensical "peace process" on the equally feckless Netanyahu. Its all about being busy, not actually getting anything of substance done. "Yes Minister" is as relevant to how how government works today as it was when it premiered in the 1980s.
The most self-important windbags in the world are stupid politicians and the bureaucrats who run rings around them. Minister Jim Hacker was out of his depth about St. Edwards just as Secretary Kerry and Prime Minister Netanyahu show faked enthusiasm about a peace process going nowhere.
Sir Humphrey would have no doubt approved.
No devotee of Yes Minister, yesteryears BBCs classic, can forget St. Edwards Hospital that spanking new cutting edge facility that had no patients or medical personnel. Nonetheless, St. Edwards hustled and bustled, a veritable hive of activity and creative energy. For 15-months since its much-ballyhooed inauguration, an administrative staff of 500 bureaucrats filled the hospitals offices, pushed papers and generated red tape. Sounds exaggerated? A bit over-the-top for real life? Not really. John Kerrys peace project, for example, replicates the parodys blueprints with mind-blowing precision. It is for diplomacy what St. Edwards was for health care an incredible lot of much-ado about absolutely nothing.
The trouble with really good parody is that it often comes true.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.