Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberal Supreme Court Justice Talks Candidly about Rewriting the Constitution
Townhall.com ^ | April 29, 2014 | KenBlackwell

Posted on 04/29/2014 5:26:21 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 04/29/2014 5:26:21 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Stevens would have fit right in with the old Soviet Union or Third Reich.


2 posted on 04/29/2014 5:29:12 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Obama's smidgens are coming home to roost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Stevens is an old fool. He should have ran for office to write laws instead of taking a job that was supposed to interpret them narrowly. He is an excellent example of how activist judges are eroding confidence in the value of a participatory democracy.


3 posted on 04/29/2014 5:30:09 AM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Well he soon will be answering to the HIGHEST JUDGE. Where he will be able to try and explain why killing the most innocent of the HUMAN race is ok. I WISH I could be there when that happens.
BUT WAIT..did not Jesus say that if ANYONE harms a child, that it would be better if they put a millstone around their necks and jump into the sea???
4 posted on 04/29/2014 5:31:23 AM PDT by Paul46360
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

> ustice John Paul Stevens doesn’t believe anyone has the
> right to own a gun

Would that include the jackbooted thugs of the Feral Gummint alphabet agencies?

Didn’t think so.

Stevens has proven himself to be yet another elitist, genocide-enabling moron.


5 posted on 04/29/2014 5:32:03 AM PDT by Westbrook (Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

We need term limits for the SC, too.


6 posted on 04/29/2014 5:36:27 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Tar.
Feathers.


7 posted on 04/29/2014 5:38:35 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Rip it out by the roots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Why would libs bother?

A couple more wise Latino’s on the court and what the US constitution says won’t mean beans.

Does it matter to Obama what the laws says?


8 posted on 04/29/2014 5:40:28 AM PDT by sickoflibs (Obama : 'You can keep your doctor if you want. I never tell a lie ')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Tar. Feathers.
I think we're beyond that stage. It's time for the pitchforks.
9 posted on 04/29/2014 5:41:18 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; Revolting cat!; GeronL

Living Constitution (without amendment) == bastardized rulings


10 posted on 04/29/2014 5:45:38 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (The new witchhunt: "Do you NOW, . . . or have you EVER , . . supported traditional marriage?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Wonder if his keepers arrange play dates with Jimmy Carter.


11 posted on 04/29/2014 5:47:03 AM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Couple things to keep in mind here.

First, Stevens’ suggestions are an outright admission that the Constitution is indeed restrictive of Federal powers and permissive of individual rights/liberties. Otherwise there wouldn’t be a need to rewrite it, right?

Second, it’s just as easy to interpret the 2nd Amendment as requiring individual firearms ownership. Consider that the healthcare “right” in Obamacare comes with the mandate that one have coverage, or pay a tax.

Applying this same logic to firearms, ownership could be mandated under the same terms. Forcing Liberals to either own firearms, or pay a tax to help subsidize ownership by those who can’t afford to on their own ...


12 posted on 04/29/2014 5:52:08 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Democrat Presidents would hardly nominate any other kind.


13 posted on 04/29/2014 5:54:46 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

“Stevens would have fit right in with the old Soviet Union or Third Reich.”

Yeah, briefly. Once he served his purpose he would have been sent to a gulag or hanged with piano wire.


14 posted on 04/29/2014 5:58:30 AM PDT by ryan71 (The Partisans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

and other sources from the writing of the Bill of Rights that the Second Amendment secures the rights of law-abiding and peaceable adult citizens to keep and bear firearms unconnected from any type of government service. In doing so, the Court struck down a D.C. law that made it illegal to have handguns at home, among other restrictions.

The statement “the second amendment secures the rights of law abiding and peaceable adult citizens” clearly shows the author to be of like mind with the esteemed Justice Stevens with little or no understanding of the phrase “shall not be infringed”.


15 posted on 04/29/2014 5:59:17 AM PDT by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

“We need term limits for the SC, too.”

The assumption was that life long appointments would isolate judges from political influence. Hey, the founders were not perfect.


16 posted on 04/29/2014 6:01:34 AM PDT by ryan71 (The Partisans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wita

A good example of why the members of SCOTUS should not be appointed for life!


17 posted on 04/29/2014 6:02:54 AM PDT by DocJhn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

This is what you could end up with if a constitution convention is convened. The power brokers will fight like crazy to seize control of that convention.

That doesn’t mean the states have to approve of any amendments coming out of the convention, but the reach of the liberal power brokers is into every niche in our society.


18 posted on 04/29/2014 6:04:32 AM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DocJhn

Maybe he will have a heart attack and croak before he can get his paws on re-writing the Constitution. Same goes for all others with a leftist brain.

(Ya, I know, I know........)


19 posted on 04/29/2014 6:05:12 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Elections have consequences. We are a death away from the looney left dominating the SCOTUS.


20 posted on 04/29/2014 6:22:19 AM PDT by LeonardFMason (LanceyHoward would AGREE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson