relevant equities
sounds like REAL ESTATE !
the fires not dying yet...
Soviet Revisionist History 101.
The lying scum in the executive branch are going to put out ... lies, and then say the truth is partisan.
So,,,, you release a faked up copy to the Pubbies,,,, and then release the real copy to the MSN. A distraction! Oh! Look! A photon!
Three not necessarily mutually-exclusive choices:
1. The republicans are lying - a distinct possibility.
2. The democrats are lying - a near certainty.
3. The quotes are from different emails and both sets are mostly accurate (even if both are taken out of context).
Who was “getting shots” at the SpiteHouse 45 minutes before the first Benghazi e-mail came in?
http://www.unslaveamerica.com/
These people must go to prison.
May 16, 2013 is the date on the linked article.
disinformation n. 1. Deliberately misleading information announced publicly or leaked by a government or especially by an intelligence agency in order to influence public opinion or the government in another nation: "He would be the unconscious channel for a piece of disinformation aimed at another country's intelligence service" (Ken Follett). 2. Dissemination of such misleading information.n. attributive. Often used to modify another noun: disinformation operations; disinformation experts.[Possibly translation of Russian dezinformatsiya.] American Heritage Dictionary
SeeBS? Lies. No credibility. This is something worked up by the leftist toads and their massas in the White Hut.
The best rebuttal they have is that the _leaks_ had bad editing? Pretty weak.
FYI to all in this forum...
Using MS Outlook (not the Express or other versions) all it takes is to open the email on your system, click Edit on the menu, edit the email and Save it. Except for the change in the Edit Date, no one would know you made changes to the original email you received. Especially since there is no track record they can access. I used to use this to clean up poorly worded emails from “educated” senders so I could know what they “really” said later when going back to review a request made.
I have no doubt someone in the current administration knows all about how to do this and liberally does so (pun intended). So, I am not at all surprised the email copies received are not the ones known to have useful evidence, but instead have innocent seeming texts. One has to request the raw email downloads, not those being sent upon request.
Democrats are just Bolsheviks in a different time zone.
Bump