[Rockitz]

Please try to remember this 10% refers to Tea Party DONORS not Tea Party MEMBERS. Presumably the DONORS are at a higher income level than MEMBERS, and thus are probably more likely to be audited.

[Democrat_media]

bs you have no proof of that

Washington times says that rate of audit is too high

you are just trying to cause confusion and defend Obama and the IRS tyranny

[Democrat_media]

The IRS asked tea party groups for list of donors . then they audit 10% of people on THOSE SPECIFIC lists. plus these are just grass roots groups . that is tyranny

bs you have no proof of what you state or their incomes

Washington times says that rate of audit is too high

you are just trying to cause confusion and defend Obama and the IRS tyranny

[ladyjane]

Please try to remember this 10% refers to Tea Party DONORS not Tea Party MEMBERS.

I see you're from California. Are you what they call a conservative out there? LOL

[Democrat_media]

They are not random tea party donors. the people audited are people on specif lists that the IRS obtained from grass roots tea party groups

The IRS asked tea party groups for lists of donors . then they audit 10% of people on THOSE SPECIFIC lists. plus these are just grass roots groups . that is tyranny

[MrB]

What would your normalizing criteria be, then?

Income bracket only?
Income bracket + political donation deductions?

[Milton Miteybad]

Unlike some here, I see your point. But an audit rate of 10% of any given population is still pretty high.