If this were a Republican administration and Sarah Palin had been involved instead of Hillary Clinton, the press would be singing a vastly different tune. That is why we can’t trust the mainstream press.
If the lady in the blue dress sucked, the media is a full-on vacuum-truck keeping dirt of the old commodities trader (Hillary). In fact, a vacuum-truck worthy of the Halliburton brand label.
Yeah smash the D party to smithereens.
There’s no way in Hell the Democrats will boycott the Committee and miss the chance to get their comments and their outrage played on a loop on the evening and morning news.
Most news viewers won’t hear a peep about any of the legitimate questions and answers
Obama surrendered to Al Qaeda at Benghazi. Part of the deal was to provide armored vehicles, weapons and night vision equipment to Al Qaeda. That is aiding and abetting the enemies of The United States. It is the very definition of treason.
Does anyone think Al Qaeda turned over the bodies of the dead Americans and let those 31 CIA employees go because they are just nice guys? Nope. They traded with Obama. And Obama, by trading with them, committed treason. That’s why the Democrats are behaving this way. A Democrat President convicted of treason? Ouch!
And we haven’t even begun to look at why Hillary and Obama inserted the US into overthrowing the government of Libya.
Treason involving murder is hardly a "scandal".
What if the committee discovers that Hillary had set Ambassador Stevens up to be kidnapped, and the plot went awry? Why haven’t the perps been apprehended? WERE THEY PART OF THE PLOT, and is this perhaps why they haven’t been apprehended?
“A waste of taxpayer dollars”, unlike the $555 million Obungo wasted on Solyndra.
This is a superb opportunity for Republicans. They should go to lengths to encourage the Democrats to stay out of it.
Harry Reid insisted on unilateral control of the senate.
Obama insisted on unilateral control by executive order.
So now the Republicans can give the Democrats a taste of what unilateral control means.
They should hold incredibly hostile hearings, with no opportunity for Democrat rebuttal. They should also go to lengths to damn Democrats up one side and down the other, and to provide as much media support to the conservative media as they can.
The hearings should last all the way to election day, and bring forth testimony from every irate former government employee they can find. There should be lots of veterans testifying, along with anyone and everyone who can tear a hole in the Democrats, Obama and Hillary in particular.
Four dead & 300 kidnapped by muslims don’t compare to New Jersey bridges
They're all little more than spoiled adolescent brats.
Al queda on the run...yep I remember Dems chanting that
Dr K: "All the committee has to do is to discover new facts, as we discovered a week and half ago with the Rhodes memo, and that you cannot ignore."
He hopes they boycott the committee, as that will allow the GOP to make the case in a more orderly fashion.
Poor demos just pawns in republican game of life.
Boo hoo hoo.
Democrats, if they aren’t standing on your throat,
they’re a victim...
Here we have proof-positive that Dummycrats should never ever be given political power. They use it like tin pot dictators in Third World satraps.
Lock-stepping Dummycrats spit on those hallowed vestiges of a government they would destroy---they want total power. The power-mad Clintons' grasp for power over and over again is terrifying.
If the Dummycrats had any sense whatsoever they would know that since the 11th century, the system of "Checks and Balances" was initiated in the Great Council Halls of Venice to keep the all-powerful Doges in check.
We need checks and balances now more then ever----to keep the power-crazed Clintons and lock-stepping Dummycrats from trampling us under their feet.
The democrats are not going to boycott this. They will do what they always do: act like monkeys throwing around turds in order to de-legitimize it.
> Democratic leaders have called the new committee “a political ploy,” a “stunt,” a “sham,” a “waste of taxpayer dollars” and,in the words of White House spokesman Jay Carney,“a blatantly political and partisan effort.”<
> cautiously weighing which strategy would be riskier politically<
So Mr. Moody wrote this crap article and can’t even see the blatant hypocrisy in his own words? Explain to me again who is making it political? This idiot just told you in his own damn article!!