Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Responsibility2nd
Osborne, 31, knew about the trade show rule that does not allow children under 16, she said, but did not think it would apply to her sleeping, 10-day-old baby wrapped closely to her chest.

why would it not apply to her 10-day old baby?

3 posted on 05/20/2014 7:40:45 AM PDT by latina4dubya (when i have money i buy books... if i have anything left, i buy 6-inch heels and a bottle of wine...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: latina4dubya
"...why would it not apply to her 10-day old baby?"

Because the only reason for exclusion of children is the possibility of a rug-rat getting loose, wandering into the infrastructure, and being injured (or causing damage, or both). Not gonna happen with a "babe in arms".

The rule needs to be re-written to reflect today's realities.

16 posted on 05/20/2014 7:53:44 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (Newly fledged NRA Life Member (after many years as an "annual renewal" sort))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: latina4dubya; Louis Foxwell
Latina, according to the spokesman, the rule was to protect kids so they wouldn't be running around in an environment where there are knives, hot stoves, open flames, etc. That makes good, practical sense.

This practical rationale wouldn't seem to apply to a tiny infant who can't walk, or even crawl, let alone run, and is plastered up against his mother's chest. He can't "get into things" any more than a preborn could.

31 posted on 05/20/2014 8:01:37 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Sanity is the adequate response of the mind to the real thing: adaequatio mentis ad rem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson