To: Responsibility2nd
Osborne, 31, knew about the trade show rule that does not allow children under 16, she said, but did not think it would apply to her sleeping, 10-day-old baby wrapped closely to her chest. why would it not apply to her 10-day old baby?
3 posted on
05/20/2014 7:40:45 AM PDT by
latina4dubya
(when i have money i buy books... if i have anything left, i buy 6-inch heels and a bottle of wine...)
To: latina4dubya
"...why would it not apply to her 10-day old baby?" Because the only reason for exclusion of children is the possibility of a rug-rat getting loose, wandering into the infrastructure, and being injured (or causing damage, or both). Not gonna happen with a "babe in arms".
The rule needs to be re-written to reflect today's realities.
16 posted on
05/20/2014 7:53:44 AM PDT by
Wonder Warthog
(Newly fledged NRA Life Member (after many years as an "annual renewal" sort))
To: latina4dubya; Louis Foxwell
Latina, according to the spokesman, the rule was to protect kids so they wouldn't be running around in an environment where there are knives, hot stoves, open flames, etc. That makes good, practical sense.
This practical rationale wouldn't seem to apply to a tiny infant who can't walk, or even crawl, let alone run, and is plastered up against his mother's chest. He can't "get into things" any more than a preborn could.
31 posted on
05/20/2014 8:01:37 AM PDT by
Mrs. Don-o
(Sanity is the adequate response of the mind to the real thing: adaequatio mentis ad rem.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson