Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NONE In The Back: Brown Autopsy Shows He Was Shot In The Front Of The Body
The Daily Caller ^ | 8/18/14 | Chuck Ross

Posted on 08/17/2014 9:40:36 PM PDT by Nachum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last
To: alpo

It will get lost, like a bunch or hard drives.


61 posted on 08/18/2014 7:40:56 AM PDT by jim_trent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

62 posted on 08/18/2014 10:47:29 AM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stlnative

bump


63 posted on 08/18/2014 10:50:28 AM PDT by angelsonmyside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
....and all in the front of the body....

But how can this possibly be?

Because all of those witnesses you hear talking in the background on the 10-minute cellphone recording who heard the shots from somewhere else and then came over too late to see any of the shots fired, all corroborate the story that the cop stood over him and shot him in the back as he was laying on the street.

Also, every single one of these people who did not see any of it but did happen to hear it in the distance, all agree... every single one of them agree! - to a man, woman and child - that the shooting was "for no good reason ... for no reason at all".

I only heard one single voice in the background that was out of sync with the other voices .... from a man who actually saw what happened, and who said that Brown had an altercation with the cop in the "truck" (police SUV), was "over the truck," was heading away from the cop at first before turning around and coming back at the cop, and who had so many shots fired at him (as he approached the cop) with no apparent effect that the witness repeatedly stated he thought the cop deliberately missed him (hmm... "missed" as in "repeated warning shots"?).

So I'm confused as to the differing stories!

Obviously there's something wrong with the single visual testimony, since it contradicts all the many aural testimonies. Obviously there is an incredible amount of information inherent just in the sound of a gunshot in the distance that tells people instantly the entire story behind the shots, eg who was the victim, who was the perp, the exact motivation of the perp, etc etc.

OTOH, a witness who is unfortunate enough to have seen as well as heard the shooting, will naturally be confused by irrelevant images (eg of Brown rushing the cop) popping up all over his memory banks, interspersed everywhere with the audio memories of the gunshots and interfering with those memories, thus rendering him an unreliable witness. As opposed to all of the others, who had only pure clean *audio* memories of gunshot sounds that were unpolluted by visual memories and thus make them infinitely more reliable witnesses.

QED

64 posted on 08/18/2014 11:10:05 PM PDT by CardCarryingMember.VastRightWC (Folks ask about my politics. I say: I dont belong to any organized political party. I'm a Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

They usually take weeks.


65 posted on 08/18/2014 11:25:03 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson