Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CIDRAP: "We Believe There Is Scientific Evidence Ebola Has The Potential To Be Airborne"
Zerohedge ^ | 10/13/2014 | Tyler Durden

Posted on 10/13/2014 1:06:03 PM PDT by Rusty0604

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: wrhssaxensemble

Rush even quotes from Zerohedge sometimes; it’s posted here on FR quite often too. Anyway most of the article is from a link to CIDRAP website.


21 posted on 10/13/2014 1:29:40 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: chris37

LOL


22 posted on 10/13/2014 1:30:15 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

Look at the terror that can be caused if someone just vomits on a plane. All the expense too.


23 posted on 10/13/2014 1:31:33 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2ndreconmarine; Fitzcarraldo; Covenantor; Mother Abigail; EBH; Dog Gone; ...
Ping...

A link to this thread has been posted on the Ebola Surveillance Thread

24 posted on 10/13/2014 1:33:25 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wrhssaxensemble
Tyler Durden links to the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy. See Link
25 posted on 10/13/2014 1:33:57 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604
Question: It looks like UV-C kills Ebola on surfaces and in the air. See here and here.

Why aren't UV-C lights being deployed at least in all suspected Ebola patients' rooms and more preferably all over the place?!

26 posted on 10/13/2014 1:35:38 PM PDT by piytar (So....you are saying that Hilllary (and Obama) do not know what the meaning of the word "IS" IS?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604
The potential for aerosol transmission is a given, a simple mechanism, and they well know it. This is more CYA!
27 posted on 10/13/2014 1:37:27 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr
It is clearly not full airborne like the common cold or the flu, else half the world would now be infected. However, it is clearly somewhere in between that and what the Centers for Disease Transmission have staked ALL OF OUR LIVES ON, namely, “not transmissible by any means other than direct contact.
If the latter were true, how did the nurse in Dallas get it, despite being in a bio/hazmat suit? Aerosolized both makes sense from a medical POV and sounds “just right” in terms of splitting the difference...which bodes rather ill for the rest of us because it is more contagious than we thought (and that’s before additional mutations, which apparently occur in literally every body that is infected.

I agree completely and it makes more sense that if she used a plain face mask or even a N-95 face mask, it didn't provide protection for fine aerosol particles. So, she could have followed all CDC protocols and still got infected. The CDC needs to recognize the danger from not using proper respirators when working closely with these patients. Of course, stating that method of transmission (airborne in aerosols) would cause panic by those who see everyone with a cough as an Ebola victim. Therefore CDC and the other doctors on the networks (including Fox) have to continue with the non-airborne meme in spite of increasing evidence to the contrary.

(BTW, I used an air-purifying respirator last year in clearing out Hanta-virus carrying deer mice from my garage. That virus is about 50-70% fatal to those contracting it.)

28 posted on 10/13/2014 1:52:41 PM PDT by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Waiting for the chorus of “it’s not airborne” Freepers to chime in 3-2-1... aerosolized droplets can remain suspended for long periods, scary stuff but logically correct.


29 posted on 10/13/2014 1:53:00 PM PDT by VTenigma (The Democratic party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wrhssaxensemble

You are right about Zero Hedge. It is hit or miss.


30 posted on 10/13/2014 1:55:41 PM PDT by PghBaldy (12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Purdue professor says Ebola ‘primed’ to go airborne
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3214435/posts


31 posted on 10/13/2014 2:11:06 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (The question isn't who is going to let me; it's who is going to stop me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

It appears that living in a desert is beneficial from the pov of arosol transmission.


32 posted on 10/13/2014 2:11:08 PM PDT by Nuc 1.1 (Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #33 Removed by Moderator

To: CedarDave
(BTW, I used an air-purifying respirator last year in clearing out Hanta-virus carrying deer mice from my garage. That virus is about 50-70% fatal to those contracting it.)

Good precaution. However, it isn't the mice that are the problem, it is their dried feces - which, like asbestos - deliver particles through the air once disturbed. Of course, I'd suspect that dried mouse bodies would do the same.

34 posted on 10/13/2014 2:27:42 PM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr

True the mice were dead or gone, but their urine and feces were all over including into boxes of my college books and papers and other assorted boxed material. Like dogs, there were certain areas along the floor and baseboards that had high concentrations of waste. Before disturbing them, I sprayed with a 10% concentration of bleach. The use of an APR required fit-testing following medical clearance to wear one, which is standard procedure for use in a hazardous location.


35 posted on 10/13/2014 2:37:24 PM PDT by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: piytar

While uv light in a patient room may help kill the virus on surfaces, it cannot get inside the patient and kill the virus.


36 posted on 10/13/2014 2:46:59 PM PDT by pinksocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Good on you. Hantavirus is a horrid disease to get, not unlike Marburg and Obola.


37 posted on 10/13/2014 2:59:47 PM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: pinksocks

Agreed. But it might cut down on infecting other people...


38 posted on 10/13/2014 3:26:58 PM PDT by piytar (So....you are saying that Hilllary (and Obama) do not know what the meaning of the word "IS" IS?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

This article reads like an ad for PAPRs. It says things about Ebola that simply are not accurate, and deliberately fuzzes definitions.

Ebola is not transmitted through aerosols, and there are a number of reasons it doesn’t and is unlikely to. It is transmitted directly, which means through touching an infected patient, or having contaminated fluids splash up onto bare patches of skin. Although these droplets are launched into the air by various means, they are not airborne, but are a subset of direct contact.

In actual use, a PAPR would replace the face shields/head coverings/surgical masks usually worn; it would probably be about as effective.


39 posted on 10/13/2014 3:32:30 PM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Great article. Should be in Breaking, where everyone can see it.


40 posted on 10/13/2014 4:36:42 PM PDT by miserare (2014--The Year We Fight Back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson