Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NY Times reveals secrets of WMD cover-up in Iraq
Fox News ^ | 15 Oct 14 | Fox

Posted on 10/15/2014 4:49:02 AM PDT by xzins

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-224 last
To: cva66snipe

As always Snipe you’re a voice of reason around here.


221 posted on 10/17/2014 1:43:41 PM PDT by StoneWall Brigade (Howard Phillips Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Well, of course. I remember how every report of finding chemical weapons in Iraq during the invasion was quickly dismissed by the media for some flimsy reason or another, all so that they could repeat their mantra that Iraq had no WMD. But now that they’ve done incalculable damage to President Bush and the country, it’s okay to tell the truth.

Expect them to go back into full lie mode once another Republican president is in office.


222 posted on 10/17/2014 5:25:28 PM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
The only reason that makes sense to me is there was a desire for a transition of power to the democrats.

Or Bush like many others had things on him that the evil Demoncrats held over his head. I think they have access to much info and blackmail people on a regular basis. I hope that someone has the guts to expose them even if it means the info they have against them is also exposed. I wish someone would have the guts to fall on his own sword for the sake of our Country. It is possible that if they did they then know that their family members will die. The major problem about the demoncrats is that few understand the depth of their depravity or what their modus operandi actually is.

223 posted on 10/19/2014 11:44:40 AM PDT by Bellflower (The LORD is Holy, separated from all sin, perfect, righteous, high and lifted up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

They never pushed back because to do so would have given the UN legal justification to continue to hold sanctions over Iraq, even Iraq's new government, and there were enough votes in the Security Council to keep them in place at that time due to the axis of weasels - deVillipin or whatever his name was and Egypt's ... EGYPTS - el Baradei who was head inspector. There was at the time a big discussion about that very problem which would effectively kill the new government by tying its hands on trade, etc.

Note that Egypt, Pakistan, Iraq and North Korea were exposed for outsourcing and cooperating in WMD development in concert with Libya when Qadaffi got cold feet upon Saddam's capture. And note that el Baradei was the Axis of Weasel's and Soros's choice to replace Mubarak in the Arab Spring but it didn't work out when the Muslim Bro got the most power and installed Morsi instead.

It was kind of hard to discuss Iraq's nuclear program when it was for all practical purposes sitting in Libya which had decided to join the WOT, and with Egypt and Pakistan necessary to defeat Afghanistan's Taliban and al Qaeda.

224 posted on 10/19/2014 8:23:35 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-224 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson