Posted on 11/11/2014 8:00:37 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
Excellent question. The Clintoons struck out badly in their home state. Has any rat candidates won after the ancient/very old and very white Clintoons did their well paid trips for the candidates.
A Simple and quick analysis of the 2014 election and the younger voters:
Besides not ‘liking’ EbolaObama or their reality of Obama Economics, the younger generation has nothing in common with the Geriatric Hate America leaders of the rat party.
The Democrats, who run America are too old, too rich, and very/very white.
The Clintoons, the very old and very white and very rich, worn out icons/heroes of the aging Rat party, like so many of the elite rat power insiders are ancient in age and in their political core of hating America to get votes.
There are the other geriatric leaders of the rat party: Reid, Pelosi, Boxer, Fineswine, Madam Secretary Kerry, Bidden, Jessie Jack$on/Al $harpton and others. They started their power trips in the 1960/70’s with a core of Hate America, anti business and supposedly concerned about pseudo racism. They have blamed America for the problems created by them and their allies here and around the world for decades.
Decades, later, they haven’t changed and still push their out of date anti America core beliefs to buy and pay for their feral voters. Their biggest failure, the War on Poverty, is in their minds, their biggest success.
They have left only false hope and no chance for change for the younger voters of America. Mean while they have looted the treasury and made their families and friends super wealthy elitist chrony capitalists. This leaves nothing but massive debts for our younger Americans.
Their so called younger stars are pro abortion Barbies and gay Kens with even harsher anti America values merged with phony anti racist bs backed by Eric Holder. As a result, their younger wannabees struck out as bad during this past election as their passe older generation.
So the current ancient rats and strike out newbees have nothing to offer younger Americans besides more pain and terrible attempts to take away their hopes.
As I understand it, both Clintons continue to have SS protection. When they travel for partisan political purposes, does the candidate/group for whom they are appearing pick up the SS agents’ costs, or do the taxpayers?
Bill and Hill are proven toxic campaigners since the early 90s. Their record of endorsements is stunningly bad.
I suspect when Chels finally starts her election career she will beg them to stay home.
Bill and Hill each command about a quarter mil per speech.
And they get a LOT of bookings (yes that’s sad)
Fools and their money.
They're rolling in cash after being "dead broke" for so long.
Rat money tossed down the proverbial rathole
Good one. Nice win for you guys this past weekend. I’m an LSU fan.
I’m still stunned we pulled this one out......
“As I understand it, both Clintons continue to have SS protection. When they travel for partisan political purposes, does the candidate/group for whom they are appearing pick up the SS agents’ costs, or do the taxpayers?”
The Clintoons probably should pick up the cost. However, they are cheap/elderly/elite snobs, and I doubt if they ever pick up the cost of anything.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.