““We indeed killed them, as our Lord instructed us in His Book. … We will not stop. This is not much. You’ll see.””
Leftists: “No, just as in the case of the crazed ragheads in France, this has nothing to do with Islam. These people are just angry because of Western hegemony and feel ‘marginalized.’ We must be more understanding to counter this type of unfortunate episode.”
Me: “Nuke ‘em.”
Categorical imperative: Kill. Sometimes just for the visceral thrill of doing it, but Kill. It may be because the victims are not Muslims, which kind of voids the first directive, which is to inquire whether the person to be slain is first willing to convert to Islam, or to subjugate his life and property to the whim of the strongman Muslim who wields the sword. Only when the first two choices offered are spurned, is the Islamic strongman then authorized to kill the victim as an “infidel”. Question not answered quickly enough, kill them anyway
Or perhaps the victims WERE Muslim, but apparently they were not sufficiently fervent in their devotion to the kind of Islam that the Beaucoup Harem endorses. Kill them anyway.
Or maybe the victims were attempting to run away, and the slower ones were slaughtered, for simply being too slow. Kill them anyway.
Always kill.
Unless, of course, the hand of “understanding” is extended to them. In which instance, they shall content themselves with lopping it off.