Skip to comments.Top Hillary Clinton Advisers Knew Immediately that Assault on Benghazi was Armed Attack
Posted on 02/26/2015 11:42:04 AM PST by Mount Athos
First OpsAlert@State.gov email at 4:07 PM on September 11, 2012, reports, diplomatic mission is under attack 20 armed people fired shots; explosions have been heard as well Stevens in the compound safe haven
Email at 6:06 PM September 11, 2012, states terrorist group, Ansar al Sharia Claims Responsibility.
(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch announced today that on February 11, 2015, it uncovered documents from the U.S. Department of State revealing that top aides for then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, including her then-chief of staff Cheryl Mills, knew from the outset that the Benghazi mission compound was under attack by armed assailants tied to a terrorist group. The documents were produced as a result of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the State Department (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State ((No. 1:14-cv-01511). The documents make no reference to a spontaneous demonstration or Internet video, except in an official statement issued by Hillary Clinton.
Judicial Watch lawsuit focused on Mrs. Clintons involvement in the Benghazi scandal:
Any and all records concerning, regarding, or related to notes, updates, or reports created in response to the September 11, 2012 attack on the U.S, Consulate in Benghazi, Libya. This request includes but is not limited to, notes, taken by then Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton or employees of the Office of the Secretary of State during the attack and its immediate aftermath.
The chain of internal emails tracks the events surrounding the terrorist attack in real time beginning immediately upon its inception.
On September 11, 2012, at 4:07 PM, Maria Sand (who was then a Special Assistant to Mrs. Clinton) forwarded an email from the State Departments Operations Center entitled U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi is Under Attack (SBU) [Sensitive But Unclassified] to Cheryl Mills (then-Chief of Staff), Jacob Sullivan (then-Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy), Joseph McManus (then-Hillary Clintons Executive Assistant), and a list of other Special Assistants in the Secretarys office:
The Regional Security Officer reports the diplomatic mission is under attack. Tripoli reports approximately 20 armed people fired shots; explosions have been heard as well. Ambassador Stevens, who is currently in Benghazi, and four COM [Chief of Mission] personnel are in the compound safe haven. The 17th of February militia is providing security support.
On September 11, 2012, 4:38 PM, State Department Foreign Service Officer Lawrence Randolph forwarded Mills, Sullivan and McManus an email from Scott Bultrowicz, who was the former director of the Diplomatic Security Service (ousted following review of the attack), with the subject line, Attack on Benghazi 09112012:
DSCC received a phone call from [REDACTED] in Benghazi, Libya initially stating that 15 armed individuals were attacking the compound and trying to gain entrance. The Ambassador is present in Benghazi and currently is barricaded within the compound. There are no injuries at this time and it is unknown what the intent of the attackers is. At approximately 1600 DSCC received word from Benghazi that individuals had entered the compound. At 1614 RSO advised the Libyans had set fire to various buildings in the area, possibly the building that houses the Ambassador [REDACTED] is responding and taking fire.
Nearly seven hours later, at 12:04 am, on September 12, Randolph sends an email with the subject line FW: Update 3: Benghazi Shelter Location Also Under Attack to Mills, Sullivan, and McManus that has several updates about the Benghazi attack:
I just called Ops and they said the DS command center is reporting that the compound is under attack again. I am about to reach out to the DS Command Center.
This email also contains a chain of other, earlier email updates:
September 11, 2012 11:57 PM email: (SBU) DS Command reports the current shelter location for COM personnel in Benghazi is under mortar fire. There are reports of injuries to COM staff.
September 11, 2012 6:06 PM (Subject: Update 2: Ansar al-Sharia Claims Responsibility for Benghazi Attack (SBU): (SBU) Embassy Tripoli reports the group claimed responsibility on Facebook and Twitter and call for an attack on Embassy Tripoli
September 11, 2012, 4:54 PM: Embassy Tripoli reports the firing at the U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi has stopped and the compound has been cleared. A response team is on site to locate COM personnel.
The DOS emails reveal the first official confirmation of the death of Ambassador Stevens. On September 12, 2012, 3:22 AM, Senior Watch Officer Andrew Veprek forwarded an email to numerous State Department officials, which was later forwarded to Cheryl Mills and Joseph McManus, with the subject line Death of Ambassador Stevens in Benghazi:
Embassy Tripoli confirms the death of Ambassador John C. (Chris) Stevens in Benghazi. His body has been recovered and is at the airport in Benghazi.
Two hours later, Joseph McManus forwards the news about Ambassador Stevens death to officials in the State Department Legislative Affairs office with instructions not to forward to anyone at this point.
Despite her three top staff members being informed that a terrorist group had claimed credit for the attack, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, issued an official statement, also produced to Judicial Watch, claiming the assault may have been in a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet.
Cheryl Mills asks that the State Department stop answering press inquiries at 12:11 am on September 12, despite the ongoing questions about Chris whereabouts. In an email to State Department spokesman Victoria Nuland, Jacob Kennedy, and Phillipe Reines (then-Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Strategic Communications and Senior Communications Advisor), Mills writes:
Can we stop answering emails for the night Toria b/c now the first one [Hillary Clintons inflammatory material posted on the Internet statement] is hanging out there.
Earlier in the chain of emails, Nuland told Mills, Sullivan, and Patrick Kennedy (Under Secretary of State for Management) that she ignored a question about Ambassador Stevens status and whereabouts from a CBS News Reporter.
Another top State Department official is eager to promote a statement from Rabbi David Saperstein, then-Director of the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism, a liberal group. The September 2012 statement condemns the video that apparently spurred these incidents. It was clearly crafted to provoke, offend, and to evoke outrage. Michael Posner, then-Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, forwarded the statement on September 12, 2012, to Wendy Sherman, Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs, and Jacob Sherman with the note:
This is an excellent statement our goal should be to get the Conference of Presidents, the ADL etc. to follow suit and use similar language.
(President Obama nominated Rabbi Saperstein to be Ambassador-at-Large for International Religious Freedom in July 2014. The U.S. Senate confirmed him in December 2014.)
Also included in the documents are foreign press reports establishing the cause of Ambassador Chris Stevens death as being from asphyxiation. According to the reports, doctors attending Stevens said he could have been saved had he arrived at the hospital earlier.
The Obama administration has blacked out reactions from White House and top State Department officials to news stories published on September 14, 2012. One of the stories quoted a visitor who criticized the lack of security at the Benghazi Special Mission Compound and another headlined, America was warned of attack and did nothing.
Other emails list well over 20 invited participants in a SVTC (secure video teleconference). The invited participants for the September 14, 2012, early morning call include senior White House, CIA, and State Department political appointees.
These emails leave no doubt that Hillary Clintons closest advisers knew the truth about the Benghazi attack from almost the moment it happened, said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. And it is inescapable that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton knowingly lied when she planted the false story about inflammatory material being posted on the Internet. The contempt for the publics right to know is evidenced not only in these documents but also in the fact that we had to file a lawsuit in federal court to obtain them. The Obama gangs cover-up continues to unravel, despite its unlawful secrecy and continued slow-rolling of information. Congress, if it ever decides to do its job, cannot act soon enough to put Hillary Clinton, Cheryl Mills, and every other official in these emails under oath.
Islamic terrorists connected to al Qaeda attacked the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi on the evening of September 11, 2012. U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and U.S. Foreign Service Information Management Officer Sean Smith were both killed. Just a few hours later, a second terrorist strike targeted a different compound about one mile away. Two CIA contractors, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty, were killed and 10 others were injured in the second attack.
This needs to stick to her.
I have a hard time believing Hildabeest and lackeys didn’t shred all incriminating evidence
Yes I agree. Many pundits are saying this is old news and wont hinder her campaign. I say not so if the GOP or whoever is running against her plays their cards right. They should make commercials using video footage of the attack and her denials along with testimony from the dead agents family. Make her take responsibility for this issue once and for all.
Congress, if it ever decides to do its job, cannot act soon enough to put Hillary Clinton, Cheryl Mills, and every other official in these emails under oath.
Under Oath?? Don’t you mean Under ARREST??
I thought all this was settled after the big dog and pony show that Issa put on declared “nothing happened”/s
I expect there will be a message from the Ambassador saying “due to the political situation in the states, we don’t expect any military assistance; everyone here is ready to die for our wonderful President.”
Just want to point out the lies of Hilary and Obama are already known because they were made in plain sight, including Obama’s horrendous speech to the UN.
Do Americans even realize that first, this video crap was all a lie.
But second, it is an all out assault on the First Amendment and our Freedoms, when leftists like Hilary would in effect excuse the storming of our embassy and murder of our Ambassador if some extremists were upset by a video.
It is all evil leftist insanity and the world turned upside down.
What difference does it make???
Anyone who opposes her in any election simply needs to run 15 second spots 30 times a day with that sound bite in it. Game, set, match.
I think they knew before it happened that it was coming. I think that they made it known secretively that they wouldn’t do anything to stop it because they wanted Amb. Stevens dead so that he could never tell what he knew about the weapons smuggling to islamists.
The media will do all they can to suppress this and half the public has its head up its anal exit passageway so nothing will come of this. Too bad, since it would have the old hag and her ex boss looking for a job.
Neither will her Stolen Valor, the millions, or even billions from foreign governments, nor the mysterious deaths of some 20-30 people over the years who were ALL associated with the Clintons in one way or another.
With Republican assistance, she is the unchallenged lesbian Queen of the islamidemocommucrat party, with the muslim brotherhood's huma abadeen as her loyal consort.
Heck yeah they all knew. I’ll even go so far as to say they knew in advance and did nothing about it. They wanted these men dead to cover up their arms trafficking to terrorists.
But what difference does it make? Congress has no balls to do anything about it.
They should get the families of those killed to answer her question of “What difference does it make?”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.