Posted on 03/17/2015 6:42:36 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
We can believe Ed Klein’s sources claiming Valerie Jarrett is the White House point woman for the destruction of Hillary Clinton. Evidence:
It was the New York Times which broke the story. The Democratic press does not eat its own, ever. Yet here was the Gray Lady, setting the headlines for Drudge.
People asked how Hillary could have been so stupid. The answer is that in the normal course of mainstream reporting, there is no Democrat crime too large for the press to cover up. She knew she was perfectly safe. Bill Clinton raping women? That story had no legs. President Obama’s bizarre secrecy and lies about his past -- no interest. Obama’s radical record as a community organizer? President Obama attending a black supremacist church led by a Louis Farrakhan clone who hates whites and Jews? No story there, move along. Obama working day and night to promote the hegemony of Iran in the Middle East? Nothing to analyze. Hillary lying to our faces about Benghazi? The IRS abusing its power to hobble the Tea Party before the 2012 Presidential election? Not news worthy.
So it was perfectly normal for Sect. Hillary Clinton to break security rules and think she could get away with it.
Even if it came out, a blustering press conference, followed by every liberal journalist’s loyal disinterest and chorus accusing the Republicans of being on a witch hunt -- that everyone uses private emails -- and the story would be buried. That was her expectation.
The mystery is why -- for the first time in memory -- the liberal press was pushing a damaging Democrat scandal.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
The media completely controls public opinion. Truth, lies, neither matter. It’s all about perception and the media has made that their business.
Maybe they're still a little sore over Hitlery's involvement in exposing Baraq's fake birth certificate.
Just a guess.
That’s his persistence in Obamacare....He wanted to show her up...kind of a neener, neener thing..And he had enough congressional minions to pull it off.
It appears that Hussein is feeling a bit "Froggy" after snapping his fingers and having Mitchie and Little Johnny Boehner bent over for the hundreth time, but his ignorance on American history, particularly the sleazy chapters where the klintoons are involved, may come back to bite him, big time.
Valerie Jarrett is the White House point woman ...PERIOD!
Yeah... If Hillary is able to ride this out and somehow get elected.... Obammy may have some serious problems in the future.
Are we ready for an Obama Foundation?
We can’t even handle a Clinton Foundation.
VJ may be the Pres/VPres in reality. Unelected and unaccountable but as someone said, they may “misunderestimate’ the Clintons.
The wheels are coming off the Progressive wagon—Its all a move to put Elizabeth Warren in as Obama’s 3rd Term (Valerie J. will have her same job with Warren to continue the Progressive Revolution—and pardon Obama for the crimes we have never heard about).
By the end of her stint at Yale, friend Sara Ehrman described Hillarys politics as liberal, ideological. Representative Dick Armey was more candid: Her thoughts sound a lot like Karl Marx. She hangs around with a lot of Marxists. All her friends are Marxists. Author Barbara Olson put it this way: Hillary was a budding Leninist, Menshevik, Bolshevik, Trotskyite What really mattered to Lenin and what Saul Alinsky taught Hillary to value was power. (http://www.newswithviews.com/Roberts/carey203.htm)
Obama is a wahabi Muslim.
Hitlers vision of ethnic cleansing of non-Aryans becomes appealing to the Wahhabis of the Muslim Brotherhood [vii] . The West and the Jews is the common enemy. Muslim Brotherhood acquires Hitlers methods of genocide to rid the Arab world of its non-Muslims. (http://www.tellthechildrenthetruth.com/mbhood_en.html)
While both espouse terrorism and oppression, one is statist the other is fascist. They are ideologically compatible tactically but have very different long range ambitions.
“The media completely controls public opinion.”
Not sure I agree with the word “completely”, but clearly they have a big effect.
This one could make the GOP-e v. Tea Party look like a high school wrestling match in comparison to an MMA event.
Maybe “completely” was not a good word. What other influences are you thinking of?
What I was thinking is that you haven't been swayed, and neither have a significant percentage of the population. Despite their stonewalling, lots of things damaging to those they support have become known, and their ‘side’ doesn't win all the elections. So they don't ‘completely’ control the message. On the other hand, they don't have to. They just have to control enough to retain power and be able to push their agenda. That's the sad truth. Your point is well-taken though. Propaganda is a very powerful weapon.
That photograph speaks so many messages. Arrogance, hatred, and Karma are just a few.
That head raised, nose in the air, condescending glare.
Gonna be interesting how Bill & Hillary respond.
True.
Yeah, Bill and Hillary might just have some tricks left for the arrogant one. Perhaps they held back after obama stole the nomination from Hillary because of certain promises? But soon, there will be nothing for them to look forward to.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.