Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. and Iran Both Conflict and Converge
NY Times via MSN ^ | 9/13/15 | TIM ARANGO, DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK

Posted on 09/14/2015 2:37:34 AM PDT by Libloather

**SNIP**

But though the United States and Iran each face domestic pressures against closer relations, some analysts see a more collaborative relationship as an inevitable if uneasy consequence of the negotiations leading up to the nuclear deal — despite the insistence of leaders on either side that the American-brokered agreement would be limited to Iran’s nuclear program.

“Both the Iranian and American governments are going to approach expanded dialogue very gingerly,” said James Dobbins, a senior follow at the RAND Corporation. “But there will still be a gradual increase in at least communication between the two governments on areas beyond the nuclear issue,” said Mr. Dobbins, a former senior State Department official who worked directly with Iranian diplomats to establish a new government in Kabul after the United States invasion of Afghanistan in 2001.

That means the United States will face an awkward balancing act if, as expected, Iran continues its aggressive stance toward American allies in the region. “Will the United States scrap the nuclear deal if Iran sends weapons to Hamas or Hezbollah?” said Michael Stephens, an analyst with the Royal United Services Institute. “Absolutely not.”

(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Israel; News/Current Events; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: conflict; daviddkirkpatrick; hamas; hezbollah; iran; israel; jamesdobbins; lebanon; michaelstephens; newyork; newyorkcity; newyorkslimes; newyorktimes; nukes; randcorporation; timarango; treaty; waronterror
He added: “That is why the Iranians know this is their ticket back to the big game.”

Might as well give them a Peace Prize.

1 posted on 09/14/2015 2:37:34 AM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

Thanks Libloather.
2 posted on 09/14/2015 3:25:19 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Obama’s luv affair with Iran is like the rich, handsome (but misguided) Western guy (US) trying to court the ugly, Muslim girl in a burka (Iran).

She keeps rebuffing him and her father threaten him with violence. But the dufus just keeps coming back again and again, always bearing candy and flowers. His parents shake their head in disgust and disbelief. His beautiful ex-girlfriend (Israel), who still loves him, is likewise aghast.


3 posted on 09/14/2015 3:40:50 AM PDT by rbg81 (is pr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

“Both sides want to prevent the return of the Taliban and to block Al Qaeda from re-establishing safe havens.”

BALONEY. Iran itself has provided safe haven for alQaeda.


4 posted on 09/14/2015 4:39:07 AM PDT by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson