Posted on 10/17/2015 11:02:33 AM PDT by Kaslin
In a pig’s eye.
Last week we told you about the menu change at federal prisons where pork products disappeared from the table back on October 1st. What was up with that? At the time I wondered whether it had to do with pressure from religious groups who don’t eat pork or perhaps some sort of political shenanigans between the administration and the pork industry. We don’t have all of those answers yet, but the resulting uproar spurred somebody to action and the ban on pork in prison has apparently been ended… at least in part. (Washington Post)
After a week of controversy surrounding its abrupt removal of pork dishes from the national menu for federal inmates, the government did an about-face Thursday and put pork roast back on the prison bill of fare.
The Bureau of Prisons disclosed the decision to The Post hours after a Republican Senate leader expressed dismay at what he implied was a wasteful survey of inmates’ food preferences and a lack of transparency in the decision.
“The pork industry is responsible for 547,800 jobs, which creates $22.3 billion in personal incomes and contributes $39 billion to the gross domestic product,” Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) wrote in a letter Thursday to Bureau of Prisons Director Charles E. Samuels, Jr.
It’s probably not going to shock anyone to find out that the pork industry lobby (yes, there is such a thing) was fighting this very hard and that Chuck Grassley was involved in getting it changed. Iowa has a lot of pig farms and the many people involved in that industry vote. It’s equally unsurprising that the chicken and beef lobby representatives were in there swinging in support of the ban. Some days you really don’t want to pick up the newspaper.
But is the ban over entirely? As Fox News pointed out, all the reporting so far indicates that “pork roast” is back on the menu in prison. It doesn’t say anything about bacon, sausage, pork chops or all the rest of those delightful pig products. (Did I already say bacon? Well, it bears repeating.) Were they just using the phrase pork roast generically or is bacon still off the menu? From the phrasing of the responses at the prison bureau it’s only pork roast.
Clear answers don’t seem to be forthcoming yet and beyond that, officials aren’t even saying why they changed their mind.
Edmond Ross, a spokesman for the prison bureau, could not explain what prompted the government’s quick turnaround. “I’m not cleared to say anything and I don’t have answers for you,” he said late Thursday. An explanation from senior prison officials could come Friday, he said.
Ross had explained last week that based on annual surveys of inmates’ food preferences, pork lost its appeal in the prison system years ago. In the last two years, the menu had dropped from bacon, pork chops and sausages to just one dish: Pork roast, the entree now back on federal prison dining halls.
The explanation that pork was “just not popular” is one of the least believable things ever to come out of the mouths of politicians or lawyers (which is really saying something) so there must be some other answer hiding in the weeds. Now that we know that three different farm lobby groups were weighing in on the fight, things begin to make a bit more sense. The next question to answer is who was responsible for making the final decision and what their ties are to the various interest groups pumping cash into Washington.
Can I be the first one to coin the term PorkGate?
I’ve never been “inside”, but I hear that pork pulling is very popular there.
I love alliteration.
Obama’s Plans are always foiled when it hits the news and the little people find out
I wonder if they would have done it for Meyer Lansky?
This was nothing but creeping jihad from the get-go.
Yea, but most of the time the “little people” never find out.
Grassley stand up for pork producers. Isn’t he an Ethanol booster? Will he stand up for any other group?
The Democrats, the party of peace and freedom...
Freedom to eat what they tell you, and to pick up the pieces after they’re done -——— things up.
porkergate......? oh Porkgate
for a minute there my minds eye got an image of Hillary Clinton
I haven’t quite figured it all out as yet, but I have no doubt that it is all related to the fact that the McRib is back!
Would appreciate him getting half as incensed on behalf of all Americans.
I detest this administration....
LOLOL!!!
No bacon would clearly be a violation of the 8th Amendment.
Prior Planning Prevents Piss-Poor Performance.
There’s no money in standing up for ordinary taxpayers, so the answer is no.
Me too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.