![](http://i.imgur.com/QHGUKEF.jpg"; "â€source:")
He was pro-choice until a few months ago, wasn’t he?
Regarding a family he knows he said that if the kid had turned out to a “loser” he probably wouldn’t have changed his mind on being pro-abortion. He said he changed his mind because the kid turned out to be a “superstar”.
Well maybe he knows a more recent family and the kid turned out to be a “loser” so he switched back...
With deep convictions like that who knows...
More establishment lies.
Donald Trump op-ed: My vision for a Culture of Life
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/donald-trump-op-ed-my-vision-for-a-culture-of-life/article/2581271
Trump is the only true conservative in the race.
Perhaps you should ask those of us who are prolife ......
....who have risked much.....to be prolife
I trust Donald Trump to honor .....Life......
.....and to protect the organizations & the crisis pregnancy centers and 43 years of faithful service and activism to insure our nation
.....once again..stands for Life.
Reminds me of the scene in “Blazing Saddles”, where Mel Brooks pointed and said, “I didn’t get a harrumph outta that guy.”
... At best, Trump doesn’t seem to have the passion for the life issue, and I fear he would not pick true pro-life judges.
And those same judges could and would affect our gun rights along with others.
How can DT be trusted to appoint after he trashed Scalia last month?
I am sure trumpees have well thought out reasons they will present to you./s
and yet you had no qualms about voting for pro-abortion Romney...
who declared that Roe V Wade was “the law of the land” and he “sustained it” (the highest honor a Mormon can do about an issue or person) and he promised to not overturn it.. he would not do anything to stop a woman from getting an abortion that she had a right too...
plus he was for underage girls getting permission from a judge for an abortion if her parents tried to stop her...
so much for family values...
Next...
Even if Trump were pro-choice, he’d still have my vote. A vote for anyone else, with the possible exception of Cruz (although that’s even hard to tell), means a CERTAIN Democrat majority in less than a decade (as the illegals are legalized and bring their buddies, I mean families, here).
At that point, abortion, along with gun control, and every other issue will be ‘settled’ and what’s left of the Republican Party will either have to parrot the Democrats, to get any plush assignments, or will be kept around by the Dems for propaganda purposes, the Iran, to this day, keeps its Jews around.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persian_Jews#Islamic_Republic_.281979.E2.80.93present.29
or, the issue is not relevant in the current election
He had an editorial in a major newspaper on the subject on the same day.
Picking Justices is like picking from a Chocolate Sampler. Using “Kelo v. City of New London”, as an example because it is in my ping file.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/04-108.ZS.html
268 Conn. 1, 843 A. 2d 500, affirmed.
Stevens, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, and Breyer, JJ., joined. Kennedy, J., filed a concurring opinion. O’Connor, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Rehnquist, C. J., and Scalia and Thomas, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion.
Kennedy: President Reagan nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat February 18, 1988.
Souter: President Bush nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat October 9, 1990.
Stevens: President Ford nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat December 19, 1975.
All three of these Republican Presidents were “pro-life”. Donald Trump has already said he is going to defund Planned Parenthood. Part of the Art of the Deal is “Deliver the Goods”
“You can create excitement, you can do wonderful promotion and get all kinds of press, and you can throw in a little hyperbole. But if you don’t deliver the goods, people will eventually catch on.”
These folks are obviously trying to cover for Jeb!'s fundraiser hosted by leading Planned Parenthood funder Nancy Brinker.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3387513/posts
Perhaps he was aware that his presence was likely to suck all the attention away from the topic at hand?
Because he isn’t on our side, or at lest doesn’t care enough to do anything about it.
New York values.
No, he'd pick judges like his radical, pro-abort sister, whom he says would make a GREAT Supreme Court justice (if only she weren't quite so old). I'm afraid he'll be looking for younger versions of her.
He was probably too busy hanging out with his sister, the radically pro-choice activist judge that he believes is a good model for a Supreme Court Justice.