Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gg188

Reagan. “No deal is better than a bad deal.”


2 posted on 02/27/2016 4:22:26 PM PST by stocksthatgoup (My first choice is Trump 4 economics and Not a Politician . Cruz to endorse Rubio Stay Home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: stocksthatgoup

He must figure he can “debate” his way out of this and keep his supporters in the dark regarding his real positions.


11 posted on 02/27/2016 4:30:26 PM PST by Aria (2016: The gravy train v Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: stocksthatgoup

Similar to one of my Dad’s expressions: No business is better than bad business.


15 posted on 02/27/2016 4:36:18 PM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: stocksthatgoup
For what it's worth...

Cruz: TPA Doesn't Give Obama More Power,
Jeff Sessions "Not Accurate" On TPP

by Ian Hanchett
June 12, 2015

Texas Senator and GOP presidential candidate Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) argued Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) "is not giving the president more authority" and that Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) is "not accurate" in some of his claims regarding the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) on Friday's broadcast of "The Kuhner Report" on Boston's WRKO.

Cruz argued that he had been the staunchest opponent of President Barack Obama in Congress. He then separated TPA (Trade Promotion Authority) and the TPP (the Trans-Pacific Partnership). He touched on TPA first, stating that "history has demonstrated, the only way to get a trade agreement adopted is with fast-track. Since FDR, consistently, for 80 years, presidents in both parties have had fast-track. Anytime fast-track has lapsed, trade agreements don't get negotiated."

He later added that it was a "misunderstanding" to say TPA gave away the Senate's treaty power. Cruz stated that "Under the Constitution, there are two ways to make binding law. Number one, you can pass a treaty ratified by 2/3rds of the Senate. Or number two, you can pass legislation passed by a majority of both of houses of Congress and signed by the president. ... TPA uses the second constitutional path."

And "it's been long recognized that the Constitution's Origination Clause applies to trade bills, which means the House of Representatives has to be involved. There's a reason why trade bills have historically not been done as treaties, because the Constitution says that anything concerning the raising of revenues, and trade bills concern tariffs, which are the raising of revenues, has to originate in the House of Representatives. So, the process of approving a trade agreement through both houses of Congress has been the way it has been done for roughly a century. And it is not giving the president more authority."

Regarding TPP, Cruz said he was undecided because there was no "actual agreement" regarding TPP.

He later blasted classification of the text of TPP as "idiotic." He continued that claims made by Senator Jeff Sessions were "not accurate"... this trade agreement, now, at least the current draft... does not impact, change, alter, or effect US immigration law. There is a brief section in the TPP that concerns issues of immigration, but explicitly, the United States doesn't join that section."

He further pointed to his amendment to prevent trade agreements from impacting immigration that the House agreed to include. Cruz continued, "Beyond that, the notion of giving up sovereignty and an international body that can alter US law, Jeff, I have spent 20 years fighting to defend United States sovereignty. There is no one in the Senate who has been a stronger opponent of international bodies taking away our authority. ... And it is simply false that the TPP trade agreement gives up our sovereignty. There is nothing in TPA or TPP that can give a foreign body the ability to make binding law in the United States of America under our Constitution." Although, he stated that it was natural and understandable people would be suspicious of a secret agreement.

He added that "if this president tried to slip something in, it would have to be approved by Congress, and by the way, under the terms of fast-track, TPA, any trade agreement, including the TPP, must be public at least 60 days, the text of it, before it's voted on."

Later, Cruz conceded that while he hasn't "studied" TPP "the way one would for weeks and weeks on end, the way one would during the 60 days when it is public. In a six, seven-hundred page agreement can there be things buried in a footnote that one doesn't see? Sure," Sessions' claims that TPP would undermine US law are "not accurate."

He concluded that the Obama administration would like people to blame job losses on free trade, but that free trade is not to blame for job losses.

(h/t The Right Scoop)

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2015/06/12/cruz-tpa-doesnt-give-obama-more-power-sessions-on-not-accurate-on-tpp/
______________________________________

Ted Cruz Vows to Vote Against TPP Trade Deal in Iowa

Breitbart ^ | 11/21/2015 | Ted Swoyer

GOP presidential candidate Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) said that he would vote against the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade deal between the United States and 11 other countries on Friday while campaigning in Iowa.

According to the Des Moines Register, Cruz said he is "deeply concerned" with the trade pact.

"While Cruz said he supports free trade, he believes the Trans Pacific Partnership would undermine U.S. immigration laws and the nation's sovereignty," reported the Des Moines Register.

"There are a number of Republicans on that (debate) stage who support TPP, who support (the Trade Promotion Authority)," Cruz stated. "I voted against TPA and I intend to vote against TPP." ..."

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/11/21/ted-cruz-vows-vote-tpp-trade-deal-iowa/

45 posted on 02/27/2016 5:23:17 PM PST by ETL (You can lead a Trump supporter to critical facts & info, but you can't make him/her think)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: stocksthatgoup

Cruz is selling America down the drain.


69 posted on 02/27/2016 7:25:20 PM PST by Baldwin77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: stocksthatgoup

Cruz may turn into a Rino as revenge for losing this nomination. I hope not.


71 posted on 02/27/2016 8:01:23 PM PST by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, WIN LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson