Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/28/2016 9:27:05 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
To: hoosiermama; onyx; Jane Long; V K Lee; conservativejoy; RitaOK; Black Agnes; nopardons; ...

Ping


2 posted on 03/28/2016 9:29:10 AM PDT by RoosterRedux (When a man loves cats, I am his friend and comrade, without further introduction. - Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

‘He calls it “garbage and false”’

LOL, sounds like a pretty clear denial to anyone with a brain.


3 posted on 03/28/2016 9:29:33 AM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

“Let me be clear, this National Enquirer story is garbage. It is complete and utter lies. It is a tabloid smear, and it is a smear that has come from Donald Trump and his henchmen.”

-Ted Cruz


4 posted on 03/28/2016 9:30:32 AM PDT by Durbin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

what is this a blog?

This is what passes for news now on FR?


5 posted on 03/28/2016 9:30:36 AM PDT by I got the rope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

Finally someone with the courage to cover the story.

And shame on you, Drudge. You made you career on this sort of thing. Now it’s beneath you? please.


6 posted on 03/28/2016 9:30:56 AM PDT by proust (Texans for Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

I did not have sex with that woman.

Pretty definitive but still a lie.


7 posted on 03/28/2016 9:31:19 AM PDT by chuckee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux
So, it's not the nature of the evidence, but the seriousness of that allegation. Did Cruz use an SR-71 in a getaway weekend tryst?
8 posted on 03/28/2016 9:31:21 AM PDT by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

Now I want you people to listen to me,...

16 posted on 03/28/2016 9:33:25 AM PDT by McGruff (Ted. You got some esplainin to do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

The National Enquirer did not write a story alleging five affairs. Or one.


23 posted on 03/28/2016 9:35:34 AM PDT by the808bass ( I am the rodeo clown for your pain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux
Hey Rick, have you stopped beating your wife?

..when did you stop?

What other women have you beat?

24 posted on 03/28/2016 9:35:42 AM PDT by TexasCajun (#BlackViolenceMatters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

I guess “utter lies” doesn’t satisfy you.


25 posted on 03/28/2016 9:35:58 AM PDT by austingirl (Taqiyya, sharia, jihad, and hijera- what else do you need to know about islam?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

Cruz will not sue National Enquirer for the same reason countless celebrities who get smeared do not — it’s the National Enquirer. Why waste time with a publication no one takes seriously?


27 posted on 03/28/2016 9:36:27 AM PDT by gdani (Of the two - Trump and Cruz - we are only certain of one who most definitely commits adultery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux
More clearly, the decision goes something like this: "It can’t look like we’re covering a story about a politician who’s allegedly been serially cheating on his wife, so let’s change the narrative to a story about a politician who accuses another politician of making up a story about him cheating on his wife." Problem solved? No!

Two issues here. One, the story is not stagnant. It’s organic – evolving and changing – and journalists look stupid when they’re forced to ignore developments that millions of people on social media outlets have been discussing for hours. The essence of the story is ignored, as are all developments and subsequent conversations among millions of people. It’s what happens when you put coverage of the reaction, before the action.

Exactly. The MSM wants to cover the cat fight, but not look into the background.

38 posted on 03/28/2016 9:39:04 AM PDT by Flick Lives (One should not attend even the end of the world without a good breakfast. -- Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

Story broke Thurs night and this is Monday afternoon.

Still no smoking gun. If this story doesn’t get real legs soon, it’s dead.

Nobody wants to touch it because innuendo and rumors isn’t real news.

Even so. I’m a Cruz supporter. Even if true, does the story give me pause? Any other year, absolutely. But what am I going to do this year? Change my support to a guy who left two wives via adultery? Or to a communist who is in a long term relationship with a woman? Or Bernie Sanders?

If politics is a cesspool then all the other candidates wear this stink.

In the meantime, I will continue to give no quarter to innuendo and rumor made for political effect. Those pushing this story should prove it, or go away.


47 posted on 03/28/2016 9:41:47 AM PDT by ziravan (Buck the Establishment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

Cruz doesn’t deny, he attacks the messenger - he’s on the run.


49 posted on 03/28/2016 9:42:45 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

Obviously Cruz is a threat, so the media is now in full attack mode.

When the enquirer writes about democrats, no one pays attention. When republican, broadcast all over the place.


53 posted on 03/28/2016 9:45:14 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Islam mandates warfare against unbelievers and is absolutely incompatible with Western society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

First things first..Rick Sanchez has been fired a few times from the mainstream media...he is a real POS. I didnt bother to read what he wrote because whatever it is will be the opposite of the facts. You’re welcome.


57 posted on 03/28/2016 9:47:46 AM PDT by rrrod (just an old guy with a gun in his pocket.l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

The media is holding off on the story until after Wisconsin. If Cruz can win Wisconsin, Trump might have trouble getting his delegates, and the Dems and GOPe can work their magic at a contested convention.

Remember when Cruz lied and said he didn’t want a convention fight? Fun times.

They are all doing the bidding of the establishment now. Trump is and always has been the only real outsider.


58 posted on 03/28/2016 9:47:56 AM PDT by 20yearsofinternet (Border: Close it. Illegals: Deport. Muslims: Ban 'em. Economy: Liberate it. PC: Kill it. Trump 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux
I found this funny and true....LOL

Democrats anger levels:
1) no
2) stop
3) racist
4) bigot
5) sexist
6) xenophobe
7) HITLER
8) LITERALLY HITLER
9) REEE
10) (PTSD from Internet)

64 posted on 03/28/2016 9:50:24 AM PDT by DAVEY CROCKETT (Cards are being played, you have been Trumped!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux
Imple questions. We deserve answers:

1. Why was $500k given by a Cruz Pac to his rival, Fiorina, in June of 2015?

2. Why was Heidi Cruz sitting on the side of a highway, when a cop found her to be a danger to herself?

3. Where are the defamation lawsuits?

76 posted on 03/28/2016 9:54:35 AM PDT by dware (Contested convention = final nail in the GOP coffin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson