Skip to comments.GOP nominee after victory: I notice no one in the Cruz camp denied Enquirer story about his father
Posted on 05/04/2016 12:43:43 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
He stood by yesterday’s comments not just in his interview with Stephanopoulos, as you’ll see below, but in the Today show interview that Ed blogged earlier. (Skip to 2:50 of the first clip here.) I don’t know if there’s anything more to say than what Kevin Williamson said to Republican voters last night about the race to come: “Remember, you asked for this.”
I’ll say something. First, Cruz did deny Trump’s insinuation about his dad and Oswald. He called it “nuts.” Second, Trump probably cares less about alienating Cruz and his fan base than about preserving the Enquirer’s reputation as a trash tabloid that nonetheless publishes newsworthy stories from time to time and therefore deserves the benefit of the doubt even on seemingly outlandish claims. No doubt he’s going to use the paper as a pipeline for hit pieces on Hillary. (Team Hillary, if they’re smart, will woo a rival checkout-counter tabloid and use that as a conduit for hit pieces on Trump in order to reach the same audience.)
He could have done that here, though, by praising the Enquirer but also saying that perhaps everyone had been too credulous about the old photo with Oswald and that he’d only mentioned it because he was wounded by what Rafael Cruz had said about him. He complimented Cruz last night in his victory speech as a smart, tough competitor; it’s weird and goofy to go on antagonizing him this morning as the presumptive nominee, knowing that Cruz is one of the few people in the party whose support might make some embittered conservatives reconsider their opposition to him. But we needn’t grasp for strategic explanations. Trump probably refused to apologize because he’s (a) too much of a narcissist to admit wrong, even when he stands to gain by doing so, and (b) a conspiracy theorist by disposition. He might actually believe the Enquirer story. Why would he walk it back?
And in fairness to him, his instinct that he won’t pay any political price for pushing stuff like this may well be right. I already confessed my grievous error this morning in ever believing righties were too smart and principled to buy what Trump is selling. The Lyle Lanley of the GOP knew better. Now he’s doubling down, betting that there’s a deep, hungry market for the Trump monorail among the general electorate too. You’d be a fool to bet against him at this point. Three clips for you then, one of his chat with Stephanopoulos, another from his chat with Hannity yesterday in which he insisted that the Enquirer wouldn’t have published the Oswald photo if they had reason to think they might be sued (which went unchallenged by Hannity, of course), and a third of Jake Tapper deluding himself into believing that Americans would prefer facts when they could have sensational lies instead.
Hmmm. I never denied that my father assassinated Kennedy. Or McKinley for that matter. He didn’t, but should I respond to every crazy allegation?
Holy cow - calling it ‘nuts’ is not denying it!
Its time to stop attacking the “Cruz camp”.
I really hoped that I was wrong about him.
“It was just the stress of the campaign” I said.
“Crazy things get said in the heat of the battle” I said.
Nope. He’s still going. I guess my feelings of disappointment mean I want Hillary to win.
It disturbed me that he saw his VP fall and ignored it..
did nothing to try to help. What man does that???
(I put a lengthy video of the whole thing in slow mo and it certainly looked like he saw her fall- just ignored her)
This is the last blast I’ll aim at Cruz. He’s out and we need to get over our anger and set a record Repub turnout in Nov. We CAN beat the criminal Hillary. VOTE
Didn’t specifically state he never had an affair or cheated on Heidi either.
Just said the story was garbage - meaning whatever he wanted it to mean.
It seemed as if our own government wanted to disavow the story so they wouldn't have to deal with the ramifications.
Title is inaccurate. Communications Director Alice Stewart said, The story is false; that is not Rafael in the picture.
Trump was wrong, but Ted protesteth too much.
Facial recognition experts could tell right away if it was Raphael or not. If it IS him, then more questions can be asked, and should be. If it is NOT HIM, who cares?
Nice shot about venereal disease though! Good one, Ted!
It is a non-issue now.
Well, Rush denied it, so there!
*Don't include me. I believe Oswald did it alone.
I know. That’s what liberals always say about conservatives. meanwhile, you can’t actually give a reason I am crazy.
I don't doubt that you do.
If Trump claimed to have slept with the Loch Ness monster, the majority of Trumpers would not only believe him, they would rationalize reasons why having sex with an imaginary pre-historic reptilian sea monster was both conservative and presidential.
Was that Cruz’ father with Oswald or not? I haven’t seen the answer to that.
Yeah whatever dude.
I really would not agree with you.
Ted was more likly to have slept with the Loch Ness monster. Carly maybe?
Either way, stupid post on your part.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.