Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How to Create Functional Illiteracy in 7 Easy Lessons
American Thinker ^ | June 9, 2016 | Bruce Deitrick Price

Posted on 06/09/2016 5:43:25 AM PDT by detective

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: lacrew

I do it, too, and I was taught to do it when I was young. The difference is that I was taught to do it after I had a solid foundation in basic arithmetic.

Common core does not mandate the content of textbooks. The textbooks seem to emphasize shortcuts in order to get at alternative explanations for the principles. They de-emphasize the foundation in order to solve the problem. That’s great for people who understand math. It confuses people who don’t.

It also doesn’t help that a friend of mine taught at a university and observed, “Education majors are the stupidest people at the school, including the janitors.”

He showed me examples. :)


21 posted on 06/09/2016 7:19:38 AM PDT by sig226
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: detective

Pretty good article overall, except for the well-worn canard about Ritalin. Ritalin does not turn kids into zombies. I will say that there is probably some overdiagnosis/misdiagnosis of ADD, and I could be persuaded to support not prescribing ADD medications until 7th or 8th grade except in extenuating circumstances.

That said, most kids who get diagnosed as ADD are brighter than average, and often can read better than their peers. I was diagnosed as ADD in high school after struggling for years, and put on Ritalin, and the difference was astounding.


22 posted on 06/09/2016 7:22:20 AM PDT by Little Pig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy

I think the problem with CC is the top down ‘edict from on high’ manner it is being forced on the schools. I’m sure parts of it are good, and I’m sure parts of it are bad...and schools/teachers aren’t allowed to pick and choose the best parts. Rather, they have to swallow it all - sort of like bundled cable.

And I’m sure that there is a lot of social engineering going on with the social studies and history courses. I couldn’t imagine leftists keeping their hands off of an opportunity like that.

So, I am a fan of CC math...but not a fan of the entire package that is CC.


23 posted on 06/09/2016 7:24:29 AM PDT by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: sig226

Well put.

and about this: “Education majors are the stupidest people at the school, including the janitors.”...

I had a 5th grade teacher who described gravity as a shallow band of invisible material covering the Earth, and she believed wheels rolled because their shape enable them to move through the gravity material the best.

And the third grade class next to mine had a coke snorting addict for a teacher who would pass out at her desk :)

So some of these teachers are not rocket scientists.


24 posted on 06/09/2016 7:28:59 AM PDT by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig

Ever read “Brain Matters” by Dr. Perlmutter? Interesting stuff in it on ADHD..


25 posted on 06/09/2016 7:33:54 AM PDT by goodnesswins (Alinsky.....it's what's for dinner: with Cloward Piven for Dessert)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: detective
Hell, most of us would be happy if they just STOPPED AT ILLITERACY!!
 photo GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS SMALL_zpswplliyxl.jpg

This is a crisis we'd better get a handle on before it's too late -- if it isn't already!


26 posted on 06/09/2016 7:40:36 AM PDT by Dick Bachert (This entire "administration" has been a series of Reischstag Fires. We know how that turned out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

Teaching worked when I was a kid. All these academics have ruined education.

Thousands of charter school, magnet schools, etc., and kids are worse off now than before.


27 posted on 06/09/2016 7:51:01 AM PDT by CodeToad (Islam should be banned and treated as a criminal enterprise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

A dumb and ignorant constituency are a politicians best friend, as those are the people most easily controlled as they believe whatever crap politicians dish up. For your entertainment hand a Wall street Journal to most high school grads including many adults as well and ask them to read a chapter or two and you be amazed of the shudder and stammer. Not to mention if and when some one has to write a resume for a job application, as good many aren’t even capable of putting a few sentences together, let alone spelling.


28 posted on 06/09/2016 7:52:50 AM PDT by saintgermaine (The Time Traveler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lacrew
But I don’t see any harm in showing kids how to do that problem the traditional way...and somewhere in the 4th or 5th grade teachers can show the CC way...and they should be able to identify the kids who appreciate the better method.

While I understand your point, I have to counter by asking if you are sure your opinion at this time might be just a bit of atavisim? The idea behind teaching everyone the new method is to give them a new way of approaching numbers; a way that we only learned through either inference by experience, or just stepping away from anything beyond arithmetics.

I understand the old way "works," but the new curricula makes the transition from arithmetics to algebra utterly seamless. And if there is one thing I have noticed about our society in general, we just don't have the mathematical acumen to think of "using what we know to find out what we don't" as an integrated thought process.

29 posted on 06/09/2016 8:00:00 AM PDT by papertyger (-/\/\/\-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mumblypeg
I’ll also assume that your children’s more competent teachers are simply **incorporating** the sight words and common core methods alongside the traditional, old school methods, only because they’re being **required** to incorporate these new methods. So a point could be made that the new, common core stuff which you are “on board with” might be actually incidental, mere examples when removed entirely from the foundational basics and presented alone, thus too complex for children who have not been provided with prior references to the rote basics. IMO this is so.

Actually, I have been pretty vigilant at not trying to "rewrite" the teacher's methodology, though I must confess I'm not good enough at it to resist defaulting to the ways I learned to solve the problems I guide my daughter through when doing homework.

Also, I do not practice "tolerance" of word errors, and baby has learned she has to get the words "right." Further, that giving the same word over again is NOT correcting the problem.

And thank you for the kudos!

30 posted on 06/09/2016 8:11:12 AM PDT by papertyger (-/\/\/\-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy
She also says it is more work for her but insists it's worth it.

Whole heartedly agree. Unfortunately, I think OUR math skills are of such poor quality that most of us railing at Common Core just don't understand "why" it's better.

As I said before, many folks step off the math train after arithmetics.

31 posted on 06/09/2016 8:20:31 AM PDT by papertyger (-/\/\/\-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

Probably. Over the years, lots of folks who were weirded out by, or otherwise wary of, the “mainstream” method of treating ADD have suggested reading up on nutritional or alternative-medicine (herbal, meditation, etc) methods of treatment. Early on, I read through the ones that at least tried to be logical, and actually tried some of the ones that didn’t involve obvious quackery. Unfortunately none of those methods ever showed any kind of positive result.

The main reason for failure is that most of the proponents of those methods didn’t actually understand the mechanism behind ADD, and as I learned more about ADD it became easier to weed out the methods that had no chance of working because they didn’t address the root of the problem. Unfortunately, most of those alternate treatments were nothing more than money-making ideas aimed at people who likewise didn’t really understand the science behind ADD, who tended to be medical reactionaries and were therefore eager to try anything that didn’t involve “big pharma” or unfamiliar drugs.


32 posted on 06/09/2016 8:32:24 AM PDT by Little Pig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig

It’s a very recent book... the theory (and Dr. Perlmutter’s success) is about bacteria


33 posted on 06/09/2016 8:47:34 AM PDT by goodnesswins (Alinsky.....it's what's for dinner: with Cloward Piven for Dessert)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Pride in the USA

Thought you might enjoy this one


34 posted on 06/09/2016 12:05:52 PM PDT by lonevoice (Life is short. Make fun of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jalisco555

——the theorists-—

That’s how they get plastic Masters and Phd’s in education

That’s the way they get more money

The quality of the educational product is not relevant. The educational system is for the educators, not for the students


35 posted on 06/09/2016 12:10:16 PM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;+12, 73, ....Opabinia can teach us a lot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: detective
Keep the kiddies stoned and stupid and voting Demagogue.

Have been tutoring a kid (she 11 years old) in basic multiplication and division. Frightening that neither she nor her classmates have mastered the basic times-tables. The establishment opts for high-level skills like analysis and pattern resolution. But the kids are so bogged down in the basics of simple arithmetic that the value of the high-level skills is deprecated to zero. It is an American tragedy.
36 posted on 06/09/2016 12:45:50 PM PDT by Montana_Sam (Truth lives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Montana_Sam

amend that: (she is 11 years old)


37 posted on 06/09/2016 12:47:36 PM PDT by Montana_Sam (Truth lives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: papertyger

“only downside I’ve seen with teaching sight words is her tendency to conflate similar words.”

Only?

This is just in the first grade when the students only know 100 sight words. Wait a few years when she is supposed to know hundreds. The confusion will grow exponentially. You are praising this method but actually revealing how destructive it is


38 posted on 06/17/2016 2:32:18 PM PDT by BruceDeitrickPrice (education reform)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BruceDeitrickPrice
This is just in the first grade when the students only know 100 sight words. Wait a few years when she is supposed to know hundreds. The confusion will grow exponentially. You are praising this method but actually revealing how destructive it is

Hardly. She's reading on the fourth grade level after just finishing first grade, and is no longer dependent on "sight words."

Furthermore, your argument is just "gun control" with different elements. (i.e. ignore the preliminaries, just wait and you'll see I'm right)

39 posted on 06/17/2016 3:46:22 PM PDT by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson