Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mariner

Seems the Russians aren’t the only ones able to manipulate computers to do stuff.
Seems Hillary Clinton’s votes in the primaries were much bigger by 9%in states where paperless computers were used: Her manipultioan was similar to that used by Mitt Romney and McCain when they had used the same equipment:

http://www.caucus99percent.com/content/election-fraud-story-gets-worse-irregularities-tied-e-voting-machine-companies-donated
............................
Thus, pollsters were quite accurate in predicting the outcome, but only in states where fraud is hardest to hide. This situation is completely flipped in the states where the placed vote cannot be verified, as the vote only ever existed in the machines. [...]

Why would voters in larger precincts favor one candidate over the other by such a wide margin? We have been unable to come up with a reasonable psychological or sociological reason that would apply only to voters voting in the Democratic primary.

In conclusion, the data suggests that Clinton won in counties and in states where Clinton Foundation donors are responsible for the voting machines. Thus, we strongly believe that the risk posed by unverifiable electronic voting should not be taken. Our country should go back to verifiable voting. An honest election is more important than a day of labor.


15 posted on 07/30/2016 3:52:59 PM PDT by rodguy911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rodguy911

It is incredible and appalling that the USA cannot manage highly verifiable, reliable voting processes. Damn the corrupt Democraps and CINOs who blight our fair land!!


22 posted on 07/30/2016 4:42:16 PM PDT by Enchante (Hillary's new campaign slogan: "Guilty as hell, free as a bird!! Laws are for peasants!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: All

Here is a clip from the link:
http://www.caucus99percent.com/content/election-fraud-story-gets-worse-irregularities-tied-e-voting-machine-companies-donated

Interestingly, much information has recently come to light about the Clinton candidacy. Notably, the hacker Guccifer 2.0 released documents which he took from the computer network of the Democratic National Committee. Among these files, one tabulated a list of big-money donors to the Clinton Foundation. One fact has gone unreported in the media: Two of the three companies that control the electronic voting market, namely Dominion Voting and H.I.G. Capital (i.e. Hart Intercivic), are in this list of big-money donors.

To examine the possibility that the products linked to these companies had been used to commit electoral fraud, we borrowed the methodology of a paper by Francois Choquette and James Johnson (C&J). Their paper is based on one of the basic principles in the biological and social sciences: As the amount of data increases, the measurement of the average approaches the ‘true’ average. In other words, as more data is added, the average fluctuates less and less. [...]

You see, these same voting irregularities had been shown to occur in the 2008 and 2012 elections in favor of McCain and Romney, respectively, by the researchers, Choquette and Johnson. In 2008 and 2012, McCain and Romney” were “financially interconnected with two of the major electronic voting companies.” Both the companies who donated to the Clinton Foundation share a history of past election controversies and conviction for white collar crimes


26 posted on 07/30/2016 4:54:05 PM PDT by rodguy911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson