Skip to comments.Senator Rand Paul Discusses Potential For Clinton Indictment Based on WikiLeaks Claim
Posted on 08/13/2016 10:08:14 PM PDT by V K Lee
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has stated his organization believes they are in possession of emails which prove Hillary Clinton was aware of the transfer of weapons from Libya, through Turkey, into Syria.
If Assange is accurate, the prior congressional testimony of Clinton becomes another example of her deception and fraud. Rand Paul discusses at the end of this interview segment
To understand the scope of the potential behind the WikiLeaks Assange information, its critical to understand the facts in/around Libya and Syria in 2011, 2012 through today. The specifics are outlined in the updated Benghazi Brief.
The Benghazi Brief remains the most controversial research report we have ever produced. The brief contains over two years of research and hundreds of very specific factual citations supporting it. Almost two years later, and not a single aspect outlined within the brief has ever been identified as inaccurate.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
Clintoon is a very sick old lady. I doubt anyone would want to indict her. It would be like indicting your sick great grandmother. They’ll have to continue to let her slide and only hope she doesn’t get totally out of control with her crimes.
We’ve got to go with the most basic one sheet of paper that shows Hillary did THIS or hillary did THAT or we will lose the American public’s attention.
You guys know it’s the truth. Majority are like 10 year olds when it comes to attention span.
And that’s an insult to 10 year olds.
If she’s too old at 68, then those who let her get away will all her crimes should serve instead. Chelsea can take her place behind bars.
I think ugly for life is as good a punishment as any.
Don’t indict her until after Trump is sworn in.
I can see Hildacankles dancing lead for the Bolshoi before she’s called to account for her crimes.
I think the back-up plan, if Trump loses, is that they’d lay out evidence on the table and try to impeach President Hillary by the end of 2017. Just with the Clinton Foundation business....there is enough there.
She is the head of a crime syndicate. It isn’t just her. Her indictment would mean the indictment of many more and would send a message to criminals in government that crime doesn’t pay or its pay doesn’t last.
Closer and closer...slowly catchee monkee...
Don’t forget that as a lame duck, regardless of who wins, Obama will be handing out plenty of pardons. If he doesn’t pardon her and she is elected, once inaugurated, impeachment is the only avenue, she cannot be indicted in a normal criminal process. If she were elected, and indicted but not pardoned by Obama, she can take the oath while under indictment, and even pardon herself. Even if she loses and is not indicted, Obama can preemptively pardon her, as Ford did Nixon. So, she has a number of ways to skate.
If Trump wins they have to impeach Obama b4 he pardons her(or anyone). Initiate articles of Impeachment election night because he can’t pardon under those conditions. Drag it out to Jan 20 and then drop it. Next go after all Lieutenants. Trump would do it.
The Dance of the Saggy Potatoes
The Dying Swan
Act 3, Scene V
Supported by three stout male dancers, prima donna Hillarina tucks bobbling head under ‘wing,’ then shudders, freezes and falls face-down, drumming feet on floor boards.
Are you kidding me? The RINO’s in congress are going to impeach Hillary? Cold fusion will be perfected before that happens!
Like the mobster who claimed mental incompetence.
Bump! Video my ass. Hillary and Obama knew damned well from the very beginning. Heads need to roll!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.