Huma Abedin worked at a radical Muslim journal for a dozen years

Hillary Clinton’s top campaign aide, and the woman who might be the future White House chief of staff to the first female US president, for a decade edited a radical Muslim publication that opposed women’s rights and blamed the US for 9/11.

One of Clinton’s biggest accomplishments listed on her campaign website is her support for the UN women’s conference in Bejing in 1995, when she famously declared, “Women’s rights are human rights.” Her speech has emerged as a focal point of her campaign, featured prominently in last month’s Morgan Freeman-narrated convention video introducing her as the Democratic nominee.

However, soon after that “historic and transformational” 1995 event, as Clinton recently described it, her top aide Huma Abedin published articles in a Saudi journal taking Clinton’s feminist platform apart, piece by piece. At the time, Abedin was assistant editor of the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs working under her mother, who remains editor-in-chief. She was also working in the White House as an intern for then-first lady Clinton.

Headlined “Women’s Rights Are Islamic Rights,” a 1996 article argues that single moms, working moms and gay couples with children should not be recognized as families. It also states that more revealing dress ushered in by women’s liberation “directly translates into unwanted results of sexual promiscuity and irresponsibility and indirectly promote violence against women.” In other words, sexually liberated women are just asking to be raped.

Muslim Brotherhood rushes into the White House

One knows how important personal relationships are in politics. With them you can achieve a lot, even in defiance of the laws and national interests. For example, it is possible to get special government employee status granted (1) to your mistress who is tied to Islamic extremists.

Of course, I mean the case of Huma Abedin and Hillary Clinton. Let's remember, in 2012, then Minnesota Representative, Michele Bachmann called to investigate (2) Huma Abedin's ties to Muslim Brotherhood. And even now we have serious causes for concern.

It is obvious that mutual relationship between Hillary Clinton and her adviser is not just working, but rather emotional and intimate one (3). For the former First Lady Huma is the person with whom she can discuss her innermost secrets. And, of course, there is a feedback which means the possible future mistress of the Oval Office can be influenced by Huma Abedin as well.

On the other hand, Huma is the pride (4) of her family, she is well respected in the Muslim world amid her lesbian relationship (5) with Hillary Clinton and in spite of her marriage to Anthony Weiner who is a Jew. Such the tolerance of Muslim community to the flagrant violations of Sharia law, and Huma's own condonation of multiple sexual scandals involving her husband – all this indicates that the Hillary's aide has ulterior objects and missions: to infiltrate the United States political elite, to gather information and work as an agent of influence.

This example makes one wonder whether we do not underestimate the danger of informal relationships between our officials? What ideas Huma Abedin plants in the main Democratic presidential candidate's head? How can it affect the decisions Hillary Clinton would make if she wins? What information Huma has gained access to by virtue of her governmental employee status? For what achievements have American taxpayers paid a salary to Huma?

In 2012, Democrats and even some Republicans called Bachmann's concerns "unfounded" and "dangerous" (6) on the pretext that "it can not be truth, because…. of reasons." Indeed, no check was even done (7). At the same time, on national security grounds, isn't it better to admit complacency of our special services and – until it is too late – undertake the measures necessary to correct that mistake?

Finally, Hillary Clinton, who has been so involved in Huma's life, couldn't have been unaware of who is her passion and confidante. Is the former Secretary of State an undetected Muslim Brotherhood supporter? Or has she just been infatuated with Huma (for 20 years already)? In any case, a conclusion should be drawn about her suitability to public service in general!

(1) http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/clinton-abedin-state-job-approved-214038 (2) http://www.sctimes.com/article/20120710/NEWS01/307100003/Bachmann-warns-Muslim-Brotherhood (3) http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/20/AR2007062002567_4.html (4)http://www.westernjournalism.com/huma-abedin-confirms-her-muslim-brotherhood-mom-proud-of-her-during-podcast-audio/ (5)https://www.christforums.org/forum/general-discussions/united-states/21584-lesbian-president-will-lead-america-to-decay-and-isolation (6)https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/2chambers/post/john-boehner-accusations-against-huma-abedin-pretty-dangerous/2012/07/19/gJQAeDT6vW_blog.html (7)http://www.westernjournalism.com/huma-abedin-confirms-her-muslim-brotherhood-mom-proud-of-her-during-podcast-audio/

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.