Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton E-mails: U.S. Policy for Sale
The New American ^ | 30 August 2016 | C. Mitchell Shaw

Posted on 09/01/2016 1:38:31 PM PDT by detective

When former secretary of state and current Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton finally capitulated and turned over her now infamous e-mail server to investigators last year, she had all of its data deleted first. She claimed — time and again — that she had already turned over all work-related e-mails on a USB drive and that she and her staff had only deleted those e-mails that were entirely personal. Given her long chain of lies and half-truths on this and other topics, it will come as no surprise that she lied. Again.

Clinton initially refused to turn over the server, saying, “The server contains personal communications from my husband and me and I believe I have met all of my responsibilities and the server will remain private." Setting aside for the moment what would likely happen if a mere mortal refused to cooperate with federal agents conducting an investigation, her refusal echoed with recollections of "I'm not going to have some reporters pawing through our papers. We are the president." Once she decided to “cooperate” and turn over the server, it was found to have been formatted. Again, for mere mortals, that would — in all probability — be called tampering with evidence and obstruction of justice.

(Excerpt) Read more at thenewamerican.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: billclinton; clinton; clintoncrimefamily; emails; hillary; hillaryemailserver; taxdollars
"Clinton took the not-unheard-of approach of lying about her e-mail use and disclosure under oath. It would appear to be something of a family tradition. On October 22, 2015, Clinton testified before the House Select Committee on Benghazi that — among other things — she had turned over all work-related e-mails to the Department of State. With this most recent revelation of nearly 15,000 previously withheld e-mails, the potential perjury case against Clinton that is being promoted by House Oversight Chairman Representative Jason Chaffetz may gain more steam. Perhaps it will drag out until after the election. If she wins, she could continue another family trait: being impeached for perjury."

Clinton committed perjury. She lied under oath.

She also sold favors to foreign governments.

1 posted on 09/01/2016 1:38:31 PM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: detective

Aiding and abetting ALL of our enemies. Is that not treasonous anymore?

HRC should be executed by a firing squad at sunrise...


2 posted on 09/01/2016 1:41:17 PM PDT by heterosupremacist ("Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God." (Thomas Jefferson))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

From the article :

The germane point here, though, is her claim that she had “met all of [her] responsibilities” by turning over a USB drive containing about 30,000 e-mails that she claimed were all of her work-related e-mails.

As was widely reported last week, that turns out not to be the case at all. In fact, the FBI has discovered that Clinton withheld at least 14,900 work-related e-mails. That’s half as many as she turned over. As The New American has said in other articles about new e-mails which had been released, it is clear she had something to hide.

Now, it appears that at least part of that something was that, as secretary of state, she was essentially auctioning off access to the Department of State.

Among the e-mails recently disclosed are numerous e-mail conversations showing that access to the State Department was often for ticket-holders only. And those tickets were handled by the Clinton Foundation. As Breitbart reported:

In one flagrant example, the Crown Prince of Bahrain was forced to go through the Clinton Foundation to get access to the secretary of state. He got it after pledging $32 million to the Clinton Global Initiative.

Much of this “pay-for-play” was handled by Clinton’s girl Friday, Huma Abedin, who had an unusual employment situation. As The New American previously reported:

During Hillary Clinton’s time as secretary of state, Abedin was her deputy chief of staff. During that time Abedin had a “special government employee” arrangement that allowed her to work other jobs. At one point she held four jobs simultaneously. All of those jobs were connected, in one way or another, to Hillary Clinton.

She was part time aide to Hillary Clinton at the State Department, personal assistant to Hillary Clinton, salaried employee of the Clinton Foundation, and private consultant for Teneo Holdings, which was founded by three partners all with close ties to the Clintons.


3 posted on 09/01/2016 1:44:39 PM PDT by heterosupremacist ("Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God." (Thomas Jefferson))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

You become rich in government service by selling favors to the highest bidders, as hillary - a multizillionaire - knows only too well.


4 posted on 09/01/2016 1:47:29 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

If you got the money, honey
I'll do the crime.



5 posted on 09/01/2016 2:00:34 PM PDT by Paine in the Neck ( Socialism consumes EVERYTHING!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; TWhiteBear; WildHighlander57; Velveeta; ..
 photo 06be7c47-eea5-4d5d-b575-92eca2ec3110_zpsvxlqixyc.png

Clinton E-mails: U.S. Policy for Sale

When former secretary of state and current Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton finally capitulated and turned over her now infamous e-mail server to investigators last year, she had all of its data deleted first. She claimed — time and again — that she had already turned over all work-related e-mails on a USB drive and that she and her staff had only deleted those e-mails that were entirely personal.

Given her long chain of lies and half-truths on this and other topics, it will come as no surprise that she lied. Again.

"Clinton took the not-unheard-of approach of lying about her e-mail use and disclosure under oath. It would appear to be something of a family tradition.

On October 22, 2015, Clinton testified before the House Select Committee on Benghazi that — among other things — she had turned over all work-related e-mails to the Department of State. With this most recent revelation of nearly 15,000 previously withheld e-mails, the potential perjury case against Clinton that is being promoted by House Oversight Chairman Representative Jason Chaffetz may gain more steam. Perhaps it will drag out until after the election. If she wins, she could continue another family trait: being impeached for perjury."

Clinton committed perjury. She lied under oath.

She also sold favors to foreign governments.

Ping; also check out huma info at # 15 .

.

6 posted on 09/01/2016 2:12:11 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Not just policy....the whole country.


7 posted on 09/01/2016 2:18:40 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) since Nov 2014 (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: detective
Require every voting machine to post the tallies with a program dump every ten minutes to a public website.

SPREAD THE WORD!

8 posted on 09/01/2016 2:40:37 PM PDT by RavenLooneyToon ( Insist all voting machines to post tallies and program code every N min. to a website!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

It’s not the crime but the coverup.

She perjured herself, destroyed evidence, interfered with a criminal investigation, and committed obstruction of justice.

Even if the FBI does not think it is “reasonable” to prosecute her original crime, that is separate from this major coverup.


9 posted on 09/01/2016 3:03:04 PM PDT by unlearner (RIP America, 7/4/1776 - 6/26/2015, "Only God can judge us now." - Claus Von Stauffenberg / Valkyrie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective
Accepting control over large sums of money from foreign governments without an act of Congress authorizing it is a violation of the Constitution. It is not even necessary to prove “pay to play” or any other corrupt action, just accepting control of the money is malfeasance in and of itself. The Senate may have had notice in general terms when it ratified her nomination, but the House of Representatives never acted on her acceptance of control of any of that dough, let alone all of it.

The Democrat Party is culpable in having nominated a crook to be POTUS. Any state legislature worth its salt would keep Hillary’s name off the ballot in November. The state legislatures have plenary power to do this:

Article II Section 1:
Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.

10 posted on 09/01/2016 3:44:32 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion ('Liberalism' is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

BUMP!


11 posted on 09/01/2016 4:30:53 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: detective

Foreign policy for sale and the lives of American service members are expendable to fill the Clinton’s coffers AND not a peep from any branch of government or representative.

The most evil government in the history of the republic ALERT!


12 posted on 09/01/2016 4:34:19 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: heterosupremacist; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; TWhiteBear; WildHighlander57; ..
 photo 06be7c47-eea5-4d5d-b575-92eca2ec3110_zpsvxlqixyc.png

Oops, I meant # 3 for huma info, not # 15 .

Check it out.

13 posted on 09/01/2016 5:12:37 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson