Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama accused of 'misleading the public' over Iran deal
Arutz Sheva ^ | 2/9/16 | Ben Ariel

Posted on 09/02/2016 7:53:39 AM PDT by Eleutheria5

Opponents of the Iranian nuclear deal blasted the Obama administration on Thursday for misleading the American public, the Jewish Insider reported.

The condemnations came after reports emerged that Iran was secretly allowed to evade certain restrictions in the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) so that it could begin receiving sanctions relief.

According to the report, released by the DC-based Institute for Science and International Security and revealed by Reuters, a P5+1 joint commission formed to oversee implementation of the accord gave Iran some exemptions so that its nuclear facilities would be in compliance with the deal by January 16, 2016, the deadline for the beginning of the lifting of sanctions.

As part of the concessions that allowed Iran to exceed uranium limits, Reuters reported, the joint commission agreed to exempt unknown quantities of 3.5 percent LEU contained in liquid, solid and sludge wastes stored at Iranian nuclear facilities. The agreement restricts Iran to stockpiling only 300 kg of 3.5 percent LEU.

The commission approved a second exemption for an unknown quantity of near 20 percent LEU in “lab contaminant” that was determined to be unrecoverable, as well as allow Iran to keep operating 19 radiation containment chambers larger than the deal set, according to the report.

.....

(Excerpt) Read more at israelnationalnews.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; US: District of Columbia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: irandeal; misleading; nuclear; obama; obamaputinirandeal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Obama...lied?!/s
1 posted on 09/02/2016 7:53:39 AM PDT by Eleutheria5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

It’s called “Grubering”

The Democrat Party believes that it is a good thing to lie to the voters. “On behalf of the common good” as Hillary says.


2 posted on 09/02/2016 7:55:04 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

3 posted on 09/02/2016 7:57:04 AM PDT by Paul46360
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5
SHOULD READ...
"Obama accused of 'misleading the public' on EVERYTHING"
4 posted on 09/02/2016 7:58:29 AM PDT by Paul46360
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5
From Real Clear Politics, Sept 10, 2015...

"In a 2014 New Yorker interview, Obama said his goal was to create a 'new equilibrium' in the Middle East.

In the short run, at least, his signature diplomatic undertaking can be counted on to bring more violence to this volatile region.

The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, as the [Obama-Putin Iran deal] agreement is formally known, provides the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism an infusion of somewhere in the neighborhood of $100 billion of unfrozen assets and a great deal more of continuing revenues as businesses and governments around the world rush to profit from oil-and-gas-rich Iran's reintegration into the world economy.

The agreement relaxes the international isolation of the Islamic Republic and ratifies Tehran's status as a nuclear threshold state. And it relieves restrictions on Iran's acquisition of weapons, including ballistic missiles. ..."

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2015/09/10/iran_deal_throws_sparks_on_mideast_tinderbox_128034.html
___________________________________________________

Aug 2015

Image and video hosting by TinyPic
___________________________________________________

Russian build-up in Syria part of secret deal with Iran's Quds Force leader

September 11, 2015
Jennifer Griffin, Lucas Tomlinson
FoxNews.com

As the Pentagon warily eyes a Russian military build-up in Syria, Western intelligence sources tell Fox News that the escalated Russian presence began just days after a secret Moscow meeting in late July between Iran's Quds Force commander - their chief exporter of terror - and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Fox News has learned Quds head Qassem Soleimani and Putin discussed such a joint military plan for Syria at that meeting, an encounter first reported by Fox News in early August. ..."

The Quds Force is the international arm of Iran's Revolutionary Guard, involved in exporting terrorism to Iran’s proxies throughout the Middle East including Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Yemen. ..."

Officials who have monitored the build-up say they've seen more than 1,000 Russian combatants - some of them from the same plainclothes Special Forces units who were sent to Crimea and Ukraine. Some of these Russian troops are logistical specialists and needed for security at the expanding Russian bases.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/09/11/russian-build-up-in-syria-part-secret-deal-with-irans-quds-force-leader/
__________________________________________________________

Pro-Hezbollah Paper: Russia, Iran, Syria, Hezbollah Form Alliance

Sept 23, 2015

A prominent pro-Hezbollah newspaper in Lebanon reported Tuesday that Russia and the terrorist organization have formed an alliance and will fight together in Syria. "The parties to the alliance are the states of Russia, Iran, Syria, and Iraq, with Lebanon's Hezbollah as the fifth party,"

Al-Akhbar Editor in Chief Ibrahim al-Amin wrote. The pact would be called the "4+1 alliance", a pun based on the P5+1 that negotiated the nuclear deal with Iran. Hezbollah is a proxy of Iran based in Lebanon and Moscow has been working with Tehran to save Bashar al-Assad's regime, even sending men and weapons to Syria.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2015/09/22/report-russia-partners-with-hezbollah.html

5 posted on 09/02/2016 7:59:59 AM PDT by ETL (God PLEASE help America...Never Hillary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

Trump: Iran Deal Requires U.S. Protecting Iran in Event of Israeli Strike

by Jacob Kornbluh
Sept 2, 2015

In a phone interview with CNN Tuesday evening, Trump claimed that there’s “something in the Iran deal” that “people don’t understand” saying if someone attacks Iran, “we have to come to their defense.”

“Does that include Israel?” Trump asked. “And most people say yes, they don’t have an exclusion for Israel. So if Israel attacks Iran, according to that deal, I believe, the way it reads, unless they have a codicil or they have something to it, that we have to fight with Iran against Israel.” ..."

Trump was most probably referring to language highlighted by the opponents of the deal. On page 142, the deal includes a clause that states, “Co-operation through training and workshops to strengthen Iran’s ability to protect against, and respond to nuclear security threats, including sabotage, as well as to enable effective and sustainable nuclear security and physical protection systems.”

Washington-based Center for Security Policy asserted that Annex III appears “to commit the United States and other world powers to the defense of Iran’s nuclear program.”

http://jpupdates.com/2015/09/02/trump-iran-deal-requires-u-s-protecting-iran-in-event-of-israeli-strike/

6 posted on 09/02/2016 8:00:43 AM PDT by ETL (God PLEASE help America...Never Hillary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

The Grand Islamic facilitator. Whooda thunk ???


7 posted on 09/02/2016 8:01:16 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

The Barky and the Clinton are the same, one is white and one is black, the ONLY difference!!!


8 posted on 09/02/2016 8:05:19 AM PDT by HarleyLady27 ('THE FORCE AWAKENS!!!' Trump/Pence; Trump/Pence; Trump/Pence 100%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
The world gets today's NSS Award (No Sh** Sherlock). Captain Obvious will be presenting it to everyone throughout the day.
9 posted on 09/02/2016 8:06:07 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

You mean he lied to us.

Like he has been lying to us about everything, including who he is.

The Kenyanesian Usurpation happened with the full cooperation of BOTH parties.


10 posted on 09/02/2016 8:07:31 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam , Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5
Obama accused of 'misleading the public' over Iran deal

Most here, except the trolls, knew the muzzie kenyan was lying, but "strangely" the morons in congress went right along. 0bama's plan all along has been to make iran a nuclear armed muzzie power.

11 posted on 09/02/2016 8:14:15 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (KAINE-Voting For Hillary Will Put American Women On Par With Women In Iraq, Afghanistan = Sharia Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

If you like his Iran plan, you can keep his Iran plan.


12 posted on 09/02/2016 8:16:25 AM PDT by rawcatslyentist (And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27

The liar’s black. The liar’s white. Together they work to bring the night.


13 posted on 09/02/2016 8:18:52 AM PDT by Eleutheria5 (“If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5
"Obama accused of ‘misleading the public’ over Iran deal"

I wonder how much longer until Iran performs their first atomic test detonation?

14 posted on 09/02/2016 8:19:51 AM PDT by 2001convSVT (Going Galt as fast as I can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty

The only one to vote against was Sen. Cotton.
Even the great Constitutionalist (cough, cough) Ted Cruz voted to stand the Constitution on its head with the Corker bill.


15 posted on 09/02/2016 8:38:10 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam , Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
Ted Cruz calls on next president to 'repudiate' Iran deal

By Ashley Killough, CNN
March 2015

http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/16/politics/ted-cruz-iran-deal-repudiate/index.html

_____________________________________________________

Ted Cruz: Iran Deal's $50 Billion Signing Bonus Will Fund Terrorism

By Jason Devaney
July 2015

http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/ted-cruz-iran-nuclear-deal/2015/07/14/id/657083/#ixzz3r8ibCjPd

_____________________________________________________

Cruz: Iran deal is a 'historic mistake'

By Mark Hensch
April 2015

Cruz argued that even a framework accord with Iran would jeopardize global safety. Setting its details in stone, he charged, would prove catastrophic. ..."

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/gop-primaries/239323-cruz-iran-deal-is-a-historic-mistake

_____________________________________________________

Ted Cruz: Iran nuclear deal 'the worst betrayal' of American terror victims

Sylvan Lane
November 4, 2015

http://trailblazersblog.dallasnews.com/2015/11/ted-cruz-iran-palestine-terror.html/

16 posted on 09/02/2016 8:56:31 AM PDT by ETL (God PLEASE help America...Never Hillary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ETL

So why did he vote for Corker, which made the Iran “deal” possible?


17 posted on 09/02/2016 9:00:14 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam , Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ETL

Sorry, but Ted Cruz is all about Ted Cruz.

He knew he was ineligible and ran for President anyway.

I have no repsect for him.


18 posted on 09/02/2016 9:03:55 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam , Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
For what it’s worth...

________________________

“The Corker Iran bill passed the Senate 98-1 today and if you are like me, you are wondering if that one ‘no’ vote was Ted Cruz. Well, it wasn’t. He, along with all of his Republican colleagues voted to pass the Corker Iran bill despite the fact that it cedes treaty power in regard to this Iran nuclear deal to Obama.

Cruz explains why in a press release from just moments ago:

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, released the following statement regarding votes on the Iran Nuclear Review Act:

“This bill was a missed opportunity. If Congress had acted to defend our constitutional authority – if Congress had adopted the Cruz-Toomey amendment – then we would be able to stop a bad Iran deal. Instead, the odds are now overwhelming that under these ground rules President Obama will negotiate, and Congress will acquiesce to, a terrible deal that allows Iran to acquire nuclear weapons and will endanger the lives of millions of Americans and our allies.

“I voted no on cloture because we should have insisted on amendments to put real teeth in this bill. Ultimately, I voted yes on final passage because it may delay, slightly, President Obama’s ability to lift the Iran sanctions and it ensures we will have a Congressional debate on the merits of the Iran deal. I will continue to lead the fight to prevent the Islamic Republic of Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons and to protect the national security of America and our allies.”

http://therightscoop.com/ted-cruz-why-i-voted-yes-for-corker-iran-bill/#ixzz4J7CzFJVk

19 posted on 09/02/2016 9:06:01 AM PDT by ETL (God PLEASE help America...Never Hillary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ETL

Not worth much.
I remember reading it at the time and not buying it at all.
It was that vote and cloture for TPA that opened my eyes about Ted Cruz.
The closer I looked without the rose-colored glasses, the less I liked.
He’s a fraud who learned the right phrases and how to act conservative.
It was all about getting him to the White House.
The Constitution says he is not eligible.
The Kenyanesian Usurper got by with it and he wanted to as well.

The resolution for McCain stated his TWO citizen parents was what made him a natural born citizen even though he was born in Panama.
The claim for Obama was he was born here, even though he claimed a Kenyan national as father.
Neither were eligible, nor were Cruz, Jindal, Haley and Rubio.
Both parties wanted to get rid of the natural born citizen requirement.

Natural born citizen means both.
Born here of citizen parents.
The founders wanted no foreign influence.
No foreign birth
No foreign parent(s)
No foreign citizenship(s)

It certainly never meant Cubans born in Canada.


20 posted on 09/02/2016 9:23:34 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam , Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson