Skip to comments.Clinton claims ‘we did not lose a single American’ in Libya
Posted on 09/08/2016 12:18:42 AM PDT by Enlightened1
Glossing over the 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi that claimed the lives of four U.S. diplomats, Hillary Clinton on Wednesday night claimed that we did not lose a single American due to military intervention in Libya.
Speaking at a veterans forum hosted by NBC News, the former secretary of state said she stands by the 2011 decision to take action in Libya and that America suffered no casualties.
(Excerpt) Read more at m.washingtontimes.com ...
And her worker bees will believe her simply because SHE SAID IT.
So where’s Ambassador Chris Stevens hiding himself ?
Okay then Hillary, if “we” did not lose “a single” American in Lybia, then how many did we lose?
And how many were married?
Liars lie and she’s professional grade.
She’s correct. We didn’t lose a single American because they’re all accounted for. We know where they rest.
Chris Stevens’ Body Dragged Through The Streets
You're right. By answering that way she wasn't lying but her followers won't pickup on the true meaning of what she said there like we will.
LOL....Do civil unions count? : )
“The Art of the Lie” by HRC & WJC
Hilliary makes Gobbels look like the junior varsity
True. We didn’t lose s single American — we lost several. This is a fine example of how Hilliary lies
When asked about Benghazi she replied, “I don’t recall.”
She’s keeping to the classic propagandist Goebbel’s teaching of repeat, repeat, repeat the lie - and it will eventually become the truth in the mind of the uneducated.
The human mind is a frightening thing. She knows if she repeats it enough, the press will pick it up, and soon kids that were never aware will be astounded and never believe the truth, just like little Muslims don’t believe in the Holocaust.
She said that no Americans were lost in Libya as a result of military action, not that no Americans were lost.
That is, she is parsing words.
She is saying that it does not matter how many Americans are killed by other means, as long as we avoid sending military personnel in to rescue them—because military personnel could get killed on the job.
I’ll bet it doesn’t even occur to her that had she allowed the military to go in to rescue the embassy personnel, the American people would have tolerated losing a few of them in action if it meant saving the embassy staff. And this issue wouldn’t keep coming back to haunt her.
Would someone please ask her who, besides ISIS, benefited from the destruction of Libya?
Of course Matt Lauer, a Clinton Foundation Contributor, rushed in to correct the record—NOT
Okay then Hillary, if we did not lose a single American in Lybia, then how many did we lose?
Spot on...need to remember with whom we are dealing!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.