I took it to mean Chicago was all wrapped up. No way Chicago is in play, why not use that money for some swing state campaigning?
We’ll see though.
I would think that if the odds are 50% or better for a win, best to take the money and effort elsewhere.
However, not paying the staff is a no, no that would cut the % margin if widely known.
You’re analysis is correct.
A good performance for a Republican statewide candidate in Chicago is 20% of the vote. It is foolish for Clinton to waste money in Chicago that could be better applied elsewhere?
Just doing what Grifters do.
Agree.
The media is touting that Shrillary has more than $35 million in the bank & Donald only has $16 million.
My first reaction was: Check the Accounts Payable on both campaigns...... I’ll bet that Donald doesn’t have much A/P hanging there, while Shrillary has plenty.
Shrillary has a pattern of leaving behind unpaid people-—she did it in 2008. Lots of small businesses got stiffed—bakeries—small rental halls—etc.
NOTHING about that woman is ETHICAL.....
I certainly hope these people go to the Illinois State Labor Board & file complaints. They have a right to their pay.