Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump and his Republican allies are 'ready to slash the federal work force, impose hiring freezes...
Daily Mail ^ | 11/22/16 | Ariel Zilber

Posted on 11/22/2016 3:57:27 AM PST by Libloather

Donald Trump and his Republican allies are 'ready to slash the federal work force, impose hiring freezes and halt automatic pay raises'

If President-elect Donald Trump and his Republican colleagues in Congress have their way, government employees will be easier to fire and they will have their pensions reduced, aides and lawmakers say.

The incoming administration and its allies on Capitol Hill are planning to try and trim the public sector work force, in line with campaign promises to roll back government benefits, The Washington Post reported on Monday.

With Republicans in control of both houses of the legislature as well as the executive branch, they now have a chance to enact reforms which federal employees once thought they were immune from, including lower pensions, hiring freezes, a halt to automatic raises, and a crackdown on publicly funded union business.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: federal; freezes; hiring; slash
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
Christmas comes early this year!
1 posted on 11/22/2016 3:57:27 AM PST by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Good, good and more good!


2 posted on 11/22/2016 4:01:37 AM PST by wally_bert (I didn't get where I am today by selling ice cream tasting of bookends, pumice stone & West Germany)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

There are many Freepers who work for the federal government who are hard working decent people. To wish that people lose their livelihood just because they work for Uncle Sam is cruel.


3 posted on 11/22/2016 4:06:08 AM PST by ducttape45 (Obama's legacy - Christianity outlawed, America shamed, morality destroyed. Need I say more?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ducttape45

It’s also cruel to demand that private sector taxpayers fork over ever more taxes to keep the government beast fed to its satisfaction.


4 posted on 11/22/2016 4:08:56 AM PST by abb ("News reporting is too important to be left to the journalists." Walter Abbott (1950 -))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Fewer folks complaining when the Democraticks shut down the gubmint!


5 posted on 11/22/2016 4:09:04 AM PST by Libloather (Hillary - the first female to lose TWO presidential elections!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ducttape45

We be the Weebees.

We be here when you come. We be here when you go.

They will reduce, if they reduce at all, through attrition and buy-outs.


6 posted on 11/22/2016 4:12:05 AM PST by Haiku Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ducttape45
"There are many Freepers who work for the federal government who are hard working decent people. To wish that people lose their livelihood just because they work for Uncle Sam is cruel."

Maybe. However, federal government workers earn substantially more in salary and benefits than those with equivalent jobs in the private sector. Years back, it was just the opposite. People still worked for the government for reasons of pensions and job stability. That equivalence needs to be restored.

7 posted on 11/22/2016 4:14:20 AM PST by norwaypinesavage (always)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

LOL. Big risk for Trump.

He just lost the 2016 D.C. vote by D:92.8% to R:4.1%.

This could easily go to D:98% R:2% if he carries out this radical plan.

Do it Donald. We can take the “D.C. Hit”.


8 posted on 11/22/2016 4:15:04 AM PST by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed. About time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Attrition alone would make a huge difference.


9 posted on 11/22/2016 4:18:40 AM PST by caver (Obama: Home of the Whopper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ducttape45

I’ve a feeling that most of the FReepers who work for the federal government actually work in agencies that have useful and needed functions.

If the Department of Education were cut or eliminated, how many FReepers do you think that would affect?


10 posted on 11/22/2016 4:23:35 AM PST by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ducttape45

When you hear Democrats talk about job growth they mean hiring more government workers not the private sector.


11 posted on 11/22/2016 4:25:13 AM PST by stockpirate (OBAMA MUST BE ON THE PAYROLL OF THE CLINTON FOUNDATION.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

Most government workers live in the burbs.


12 posted on 11/22/2016 4:26:11 AM PST by stockpirate (OBAMA MUST BE ON THE PAYROLL OF THE CLINTON FOUNDATION.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I worked for the feds for 30 years. Reagan imposed a hiring freeze that lasted about 10 years. People who retired, resigned, died or left for other reasons, couldn’t be replaced by new people, their positions had to be filled from within. There was a dramatic drop in the number of employees, and it did increase the workload on each employee. That was not really a bad deal, when applying for promotions, we didn’t have to compete with outsiders, plus with all the work to be done, no one was ever fired unless the were really really bad. Reagan also did not give us our yearly Cost of Living raise for about 4 years.


13 posted on 11/22/2016 4:28:54 AM PST by euram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: euram

Retired Fed here. Fortunately, my pension is locked in. But I do wonder whether they’ll change the pension formula for future new hires.


14 posted on 11/22/2016 4:33:28 AM PST by Poundstone (A recent Federal retiree and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate
Most government workers live in the burbs.

That's true. I just couldn't resist the opportunity to post the D.C. data.

15 posted on 11/22/2016 4:35:50 AM PST by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed. About time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom

“I’ve a feeling that most of the FReepers who work for the federal government actually work in agencies that have useful and needed functions.

If the Department of Education were cut or eliminated, how many FReepers do you think that would affect?”

I couldn’t care less. Given the state of “education” in this country, their “Department” is either ineffectual or part of the problem - not the solution.

In fact, one can say that about the government in general.


16 posted on 11/22/2016 4:53:08 AM PST by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage
However, federal government workers earn substantially more in salary and benefits than those with equivalent jobs in the private sector.

Actually they may have between 9/11 and 2007 due to ramping up for war on terror, but they don't now. The two studies that showed they did failed to adjust for education. The majority of the federal workforce has BSc or higher. In the DoD agency I worked at the MINIMUM education required for hire has always been a MSc in a hard science with required credits in math and hard science (engineering, physics, or math). The DoD RDT&E community has contracted out the low education jobs, so almost all the jobs are professional degrees (MSc, PhD, J.D.). Here is a CBO chart from 2005-2010 showing the comparison then; in reality the wage freeze since 2010 has hurt government scientists and engineers much worse than the private sector (based on salary and benefits among private contractors vs. government). It is true that blue collar jobs pay better, but there are very few of them, and they are specialized labor (e.g. fabrication, test range workers).

Here is CBO Link.

17 posted on 11/22/2016 4:54:35 AM PST by LambSlave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I’d like to see them forget even the “penny plan” and go for the “nickel plan”, at least!


18 posted on 11/22/2016 4:57:03 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poundstone
But I do wonder whether they’ll change the pension formula for future new hires.

It seems to me that they've already wrung the blood out of that turnip. The Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) was put into place back in 1985 (or so) and replaced The Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) for all new hires after that point. FERS consists of Social Security plus a Thrift Savings Plan with matching contributions up to 5%. About the same as any retirement plan in industry these days.

The number of CSRS employees left in government has dwindled pretty far and all of them are now retirement age or retired. After working for 35 plus years for a pension it would be unfair (even criminal) to change it on them at the last minute when they can no longer plan for it.

That is why FERS was implemented as it was, to give the employee a chance to plan. New hires were given 40 years to plan for retirement.

19 posted on 11/22/2016 5:03:48 AM PST by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Poundstone

The Civil Service Retirement System that we knew and loved hasn’t existed for a number of years. Now, most of those I know who are still in the Fed workforce say that they won’t be able to retire until they are 66, and the even younger employees won’t be able to retire until 67, since their pension is now linked to Social Security.

It wouldn’t surprise me any if there was a reduction in the amount of matching funds that the government provides to current workers who invest in the Thrift Savings Plan. My son now works for the Feds, so he’ll keep me posted on any changes they make.


20 posted on 11/22/2016 5:05:00 AM PST by euram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson