Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Music Rights Orgs Hoping Trump Won’t Hold Hillary Donations Against Them
Townhall.com ^ | November 25, 2016 | Brian McNicoll

Posted on 11/25/2016 7:10:49 AM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 11/25/2016 7:10:49 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Mercy is not for the vanquished to command.


2 posted on 11/25/2016 7:12:01 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

[snip] he Department of Justice just finished a more than two-year review of the ASCAP and BMI antitrust consent decrees,[snip]

From what we know today about the corrupt DOJ, that statement is supposed to carry any weight? I would submit they have just opened a box that they wanted to stay closed. Sessions should have one of his deputies look into everything about this sometime down the road and let them hang in the wind.


3 posted on 11/25/2016 7:16:35 AM PST by mazda77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“Music Rights? What the heck is a music right?


4 posted on 11/25/2016 7:17:13 AM PST by zencycler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It’s not the donations, but the cronyism Trump will address if he chooses.


5 posted on 11/25/2016 7:19:42 AM PST by Eddie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

A Trump DOJ should prosecute “music” companies, writers, producers, performers, licensing organizations, distributors, and retailers for the toxic filth they fire hose on our society and directly into the brains of American youth.


6 posted on 11/25/2016 7:29:56 AM PST by nickedknack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
From No Policy Talk From Team Trump At Meeting With Tech Giants

Trump’s presidential transition team met with dozens of tech, telecom, and media representatives Friday, but according to several people familiar with the meeting, team Trump offered little insight into the Republican Presidential candidate’s view on tech policy. .... Representatives from Google, Uber, and Twitter attended the meeting. They were joined by trade and advocacy groups including the Consumer Technology Association, the Information Technology Industry Council and the Internet Association. About 50 people attended the off-the-record meeting, which took place at the offices of the law firm Baker Hostetler, in Washington, DC. The Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) and AT&T were also represented .

In the first place, this isn't about "technology policy" e.g. science and technology for the betterment of the people. This is about intellectual property protection, a lot of which is pushed by patent and copy-right "trolls."

This article is exactly why we launched a nuclear Trump to irradiate and sterilize the swamp. The attendees at this meeting would be a good start. They don't want less regulation. They are the guys who want more regulation that benefit THEM.

7 posted on 11/25/2016 8:12:22 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eddie01
It’s not the donations, but the cronyism Trump will address

And these folks are some of the best-heeled cronies around. They slither in swamp muck.

8 posted on 11/25/2016 8:13:27 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Republicans like Orrin Hatch have been protecting the music industry for decades, despite the open contempt and hostility that business shows for conservatives and the Republican Party, and the powerful support the music industry provides for the Democratic Party. In Hatch's case, the support seems to come from the fact that he scribbles some lyrics himself for some recordings that a handful of people (probably his staffers) have purchased - he actually seems to consider himself a member of the music industry.

It's long past time for the Republicans to stop trying to cuddle up to people and industries that despise them - conservatives need to make the music industry realize that their naked hostility and antagonism has consequences.
9 posted on 11/25/2016 8:18:20 AM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zencycler
"Music rights."

Music Rights generally refers to the the copyrights on music. It refers to the composers and performers. If the music is being used in public, such as department stores or restaurants, the rights holders are dues some sort of royalty. Many places use a "muzak" instrumental version of a song to avoid having to pay additional rights to the original perfomers. This is why some old TV shows have not been released on DVD or Blu-ray. If the show features recordings of popular songs, the rights have to be re-negotiated with the rights holders, adding to the expense of the release. In some cases, they replace the original music rather than pay the fees for the rights.

10 posted on 11/25/2016 8:26:19 AM PST by Sans-Culotte (Time to get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

They are going to pay a price.

Trump is taking names.
There will be payback.
In the long run that’s the only way to put a stop
to this insane sh**. Make the perpetrators (finally)
pay a price.


11 posted on 11/25/2016 8:42:32 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

There are consequences!


12 posted on 11/25/2016 9:32:58 AM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Mercy is reserved for the repentant. Of whom these are not.


13 posted on 11/25/2016 9:46:53 AM PST by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
" . . . looks at the presidency as something to do, not something to be."

That is a truly concise assessment.

14 posted on 11/25/2016 10:28:13 AM PST by fella ("As this iiwas before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sans-Culotte

IMHO they should then be called Property Rights groups because 1) that’s the founding principal from with that derives and 2) it would drive the libs in the music industry crazy to have their group referred to that way!


15 posted on 11/25/2016 11:35:54 AM PST by zencycler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

For myself, I think that copyright continues on far, far too long. IMHO, pretty much anything over 50 years old should pass into the public domain. Yeah, that includes Beatles songs.


16 posted on 11/25/2016 12:38:24 PM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eddie01

this is why all the big elites and companies wanted the Toon....she is willing to do anything, anything at all for a price, and its so comforting for the elite companies to rely on simple money to make decisions, other than legality, fairness, integrity,or American values...


17 posted on 11/25/2016 12:41:26 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
...they obviously thought she was more favorably disposed to a pay-for-play arrangement.

I don't see why not, she'd already put the foreign policy of the United States up for sale. But they may have to wait a bit, because Trump has a lot bigger issues on his plate at the moment.

18 posted on 11/25/2016 12:44:23 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

What he needs to do is push congress to return copyright law to it’s initial 14 year term for registered works, with a possible single extension of 14 years.. That would make most of this crap moot, as there would be a huge catalog of public domain stuff available that people could use. That would put the screws on BMI and ASCAP to be reasonable.


19 posted on 11/25/2016 1:07:26 PM PST by zeugma (I'm going to get fat from all this schadenfreude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glorgau
For myself, I think that copyright continues on far, far too long. IMHO, pretty much anything over 50 years old should pass into the public domain. Yeah, that includes Beatles songs.

The initial copyright was for a maximum 28-year term. Under that regime, the entire Beatles catalog would be in the public domain, as well as most all 'classic rock'. Heck, Pink Floyd's Dark Side of the Moon was released in '73.

20 posted on 11/25/2016 1:11:03 PM PST by zeugma (I'm going to get fat from all this schadenfreude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson