Except stein is also an old hag.
I would suggest that if it a tight race, for any position (President, governor, etc), and one-percent difference in the votes...then the state ought to pay for it. A third-party or fourth-party that is 300,000 votes away...it should be entirely on them, and they should post a bond as they register for the election to cover this entirely.
It never ends.
Concede
Violent demonstrations
Hysteria and call for safe places
Papers run stories of how immigrant families will be broken up
Muslims claim oppressive regime out to get them
Hopeless recounts
Call for electors to cross over
Russia made us do it
Call for electors to be briefed on Russia’s roll in “swinging the election to Trump.
What’s next? Trump the child molester, head of the communist party, just doing a project for celebrity apprentice. Only Podesta and Hillary know for sure.
We should not allow Russia to get away with this.
The ultimate law, of course - and exactly where the US is heading - will be to legislate that if any Republican ever wins an election, anywhere at all, the office will be given to a democrat, anyway.
The brighter side of the Wisconsin recount is that Soros paid for it, and a couple of thousand Wisconsinites earned some extra Christmas money. Not that Wackenstein had any standing, but at least the taxpayers of Wisconsin didn’t foot the bill.
Except stein is also an old hag.
I’ve read through the article 3 times. Admittedly, it’s a bit early for my eyes, but I don’t see anything in the article about proposed changes. Just a reiteration of the existing law. And, of course, the joy of winning again - by a slightly larger vote count. :-)
I would suggest a Federal law that no candidate who garners less than 20% of the vote will have standing to request a recount or challenge the results in ANY court.
Stein was a stalking horse for Clinton