Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Voter Fraud? Michigan Recount Uncovers Too Many Votes in 37% of Detroit Precincts
The Gateway Pundit ^ | December 13, 2016 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 12/13/2016 8:07:51 AM PST by bobsunshine

Green Party candidate Jill Stein’s Michigan recount unintentionally exposed major voter fraud in Detroit.

Election officials in Michigan found that 37% of precincts in Detroit tabulated more ballots than the number of voters tallied by workers in the poll books.

Hillary Clinton won Wayne County over Donald Trump 67% to 30%.

State officials are planning to examine about 20 Detroit precincts where ballot discrepancies occurred. Detroit News reported:

Voting machines in more than one-third of all Detroit precincts registered more votes than they should have during last month’s presidential election, according to Wayne County records prepared at the request of The Detroit News.

Detailed reports from the office of Wayne County Clerk Cathy Garrett show optical scanners at 248 of the city’s 662 precincts, or 37 percent, tabulated more ballots than the number of voters tallied by workers in the poll books. Voting irregularities in Detroit have spurred plans for an audit by Michigan Secretary of State Ruth Johnson’s office, Elections Director Chris Thomas said Monday.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016recount; clinton; detroit; election; fraud; hillary; mi; michigan; recount; stein; trump; trumpstillwinning; trumpwinsagain; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

1 posted on 12/13/2016 8:07:51 AM PST by bobsunshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bobsunshine

Were the Amish voting?


2 posted on 12/13/2016 8:10:10 AM PST by laweeks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bobsunshine
Green Party candidate Jill Stein’s Michigan recount unintentionally exposed major voter fraud in Detroit.

I believe this is the real reason a Clinton-appointed Federal judge shut the whole thing down.

3 posted on 12/13/2016 8:11:15 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bobsunshine

damn Canadians!!


4 posted on 12/13/2016 8:11:26 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bobsunshine

But its the Russians.


5 posted on 12/13/2016 8:11:47 AM PST by rey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bobsunshine

And now let us figure out where those votes came from...??? Easy one. Trump has enough ammo to take down an awful lot of people for voting crimes. Let the Rats keep pushing and see what happens...


6 posted on 12/13/2016 8:12:29 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rey
that's the reason we're hearing the Russians hacked the election.

dims don't want the real hacking to be known.

7 posted on 12/13/2016 8:13:42 AM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

Actually, it was a Michigan Appeals Court and Michigan Supreme Court that shut it down. The fed court deferred to the state here once a decision was rendered at that level.


8 posted on 12/13/2016 8:14:35 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: laweeks

THIS IS NOT UNUSUAL IN Democrat precincts.


9 posted on 12/13/2016 8:15:28 AM PST by Herman Ball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

Oh ho! Well, that makes sense.


10 posted on 12/13/2016 8:16:16 AM PST by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bobsunshine
...optical scanners at 248 of the city’s 662 precincts, or 37 percent, tabulated more ballots than the number of voters tallied by workers in the poll books...

They were just too lazy to forge names in the poll books. They'll know better next time.

11 posted on 12/13/2016 8:16:18 AM PST by Wissa (Few men desire liberty. Most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bobsunshine

Ha. Ha...

Democrat donors just paid millions to discover their own party are committing voter fraud...


12 posted on 12/13/2016 8:20:12 AM PST by Popman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bobsunshine

Well,my,my,my! You now have my full attention!

13 posted on 12/13/2016 8:20:32 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Deplorables' Lives Matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bobsunshine

Can’t be. If it were true NPR would have reported it. /not


14 posted on 12/13/2016 8:21:09 AM PST by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

China! China! It’s China! </sarcasm>


15 posted on 12/13/2016 8:21:59 AM PST by Democrats hate too much
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

The Amish are responsible for this!


16 posted on 12/13/2016 8:22:27 AM PST by billyboy15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rey

I’m so confused !! Is it the Russian, Chinese, Aliens? I think it’s the space invaders. Stupid Russians - Detroit went mainly for Clinton.

Seriously, I read that they had problems with the machines on election night (Detroit only) were the machine would reject the ballot, so they kept trying until it accepted it. The poll monitor was suppose to delete those extra counts, but I guess they forgot. All of these people should be prosecuted. Period.


17 posted on 12/13/2016 8:23:55 AM PST by bobsunshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bobsunshine

Just the tip of the iceberg from a national perspective.


18 posted on 12/13/2016 8:24:20 AM PST by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bobsunshine

I think it was those ‘extra’ votes the media were hoping for when they stopped calling states on election night.

They were hoping for the Clinton votes to catch up. After a few hours, they realized the distances between Trump and Clinton numbers were just too great to overcome — even with the ‘extra’ votes. And too many ‘extra’ votes might raise suspicions later.


19 posted on 12/13/2016 8:24:26 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Herman Ball
This is not unusual in dem precincts

My experience in OH as a poll worker in OH is that there are so many safeguards in place that no one can be in charge of safeguarding the safeguards, unless it's legit that both political parties have workers when voters sign in, when they cast ballots, and when the sign in book and machine tally are verified to be the same.

Could absentee ballots get cast? Are those extra ballots added after everything is shut down? Are there precincts where nobody is effectively supervising the workers?

Dr. Stein might have created some unintended consequences here. From my experience, I thought that it would make sense to simplify the system, get rid of absentee and early voting, and have Presidential voting only for that and any US Senate races. Where I was, it was honest and the poll workers had impressive pride in things running perfectly. Perhaps it's not that way everywhere.

20 posted on 12/13/2016 8:25:39 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson