Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Crucial
But the impact of trade was miniscule when compared to the size of the overall economic contraction. Government expenditures remained essentially constant, but private consumption and investment plummeted. Of the $131 billion in lost economic output over the five-year period, only about $0.7 billion seems attributable to trade. This is shown as the last entry in the last row of the table. In either absolute or relative terms, the trade portion of the economic contraction of the Great Depression appears to be of little import.

Read more: Smoot-Hawley and the Great Depression

6 posted on 12/23/2016 5:23:48 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: central_va

And none other then Benny Bernanke insists that Smoot-Hawley was a minor problem, and that the real problem was Federal Reserve mismanagement of the money supply in the aftermath of the stock market price collapse.

As he said to the Reserve bankers, We caused it.

Thus his label of Helicopter Ben because he planned to do quite the opposite should he be confronted with such an event.

Which of course he did, and the result is $20 trillion of debt. But that’s another discussion....


20 posted on 12/23/2016 5:56:10 PM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson