Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Safety Records Show Pipelines Best Method for Transporting Oil
The New American ^ | 20 October 2014 | Bob Adelmann

Posted on 01/24/2017 8:26:57 AM PST by VitacoreVision

The combination of the Obama administration’s intransigence in approving the Keystone XL pipeline and the exponential explosion in the production of crude oil, especially from the Bakken formation in North Dakota, has put increasing pressure on alternative modes of transportation to get that crude to refineries and customers. But with the increasing use of alternative modes such as barges, railcars, and over-the-road tanker trucks has come a growing concern about safety.

A series of rail accidents over the last several years has caught the attention of the Department of Transportation, and CNBC has tried its best to question the viability of oil transport safety. Since 2008, at least 10 incidents involving freight trains hauling crude across North America have spilled almost three million gallons of oil and, the most horrific accident — the Lac-Megantic derailment near Québec, Canada — killed 47 residents and destroyed half the town.

In response, the U.S. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) has issued mandates to beef up the more than 300,000 railcars currently carrying crude across the country.

However, according to John Edwards, a senior analyst and director at Credit Suisse:

If you look at the safety record of crude oil pipelines versus alternatives, pipelines come out on top.
Release rates, as of 2012, were roughly 25 barrels per billion barrel miles … a very, very low rate of incidence taken over the hundreds of thousands of miles of pipelines and the transport millions of barrels of oil every day.

America’s energy needs are so enormous that more than 18 million barrels of crude per day course through more than 500,000 miles of pipelines, either from sites such as Bakken, or ports on the East and Gulf Coast importing oil from foreign sources. Enbridge Energy Partners, the largest importer of crude into the United States, runs more than 50,000 miles of pipeline and has moved 13 billion barrels through its system over the last 10 years. Its "incident" rate (to count as an "incident" it must involve an explosion or fire, a release of five or more gallons of crude oil, an injury requiring hospitalization, a fatality, or property damage in excess of $50,000) is a minuscule .0007 percent. Put another way, 99.9993 percent of its oil arrives at its destination without incident.

But even that isn’t good enough for Enbridge, according to Bradley Schamla, senior vice president of U.S. operations:

I could talk about our safety record in terms of the [incident rate], but we don’t talk a lot about that, because we’re really focused on the very small percentage…. No leak is acceptable.
Our focus is really on eliminating all leaks with the goal of zero in our pipeline system.

As a whole, the oil pipeline delivery system is almost there. Of the 10 incidents recorded since 2008 involving three million gallons of oil (gallons, not barrels — there are 42 gallons in every barrel), the Lac-Megantic derailment was responsible for half of them.

The same month as the Lac-Megantic incident, the Manhattan Institute published its report claiming that pipelines are far safer for the transportation of oil and gas than trucks, barges, or railcars by a factor of 30 to 1. Wrote Senior Fellow Diana Furchtgott-Roth:

In addition to enjoying a substantial cost advantage, pipelines result in fewer spillage incidents and personal injuries than road and rail. Americans are more likely to get struck by lightning than to be killed in a pipeline accident.

With more than 70 percent of crude oil and petroleum products being shipped by pipeline, it would be reasonable to assume that most incidents would involve pipelines. But exactly the opposite is true, according to Furchtgott-Roth. The majority of incidents occur on the road and by rail, though trucking accounts for just four percent of shipments and rail for just three, with tanker and barge traffic accounting for the remaining 23 percent. For instance, between 2005 and 2009, there were 20 such incidents for every billion ton miles involving over-the-road tanker trucks and more than two incidents involving railcars. But the incident rate for pipelines is just 0.58, according to the study. Put another way, rail caused nearly 30 times as many injuries requiring hospitalization as pipelines. Concluded Furchtgott-Roth:

The evidence is clear: transporting oil and natural gas by pipeline is safe. Furthermore, pipeline transportation is safer than transportation by road, rail, or barge, as measured by incidents, injuries, and fatalities — even though more road and rail incidents go unreported.

When the Canadian think tank Fraser Institute picked up the Manhattan study and expanded and refined it last October, it came to the same conclusion: Resistance to pipeline transportation is forcing oil to its markets "by modes of transport that pose higher risks of spills and personal injuries such as rail and road transport."

This aroused the ire of Peter Goelz, the former managing director of the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board and now a senior vice president for a public relations firm out of Boston. Writing at the online Huffington Post in November, he called the Manhattan study "misguided" and the Fraser Institute report "discredited," both failed attempts to promote pipelines over railroads. But in his conclusion, Goelz admitted that the safety record of both pipelines and railroads is remarkable:

The Fraser Institute tries to make two broad points: that pipelines are both a safer and more environmentally "friendly" way to transport crude oil than railroads. Fraser is wrong on both accounts. But in making their thinly supported political attack, they miss the real truth: both pipelines and railroads deliver better than 99.5% of their crude oil products safely.
They are both safe.

In an imperfect world, of course, nothing is completely safe. What’s frustrating is that the Obama administration’s interminable delay of approval of the final leg of the Keystone XL pipeline is forcing producers and refiners to use other, higher-risk, modes of transportation to get their product to market and into the hands and gas tanks of their customers. It’s an inevitable consequence of adhering to an ideological point of view that clashes with reality.

A graduate of Cornell University and a former investment advisor, Bob is a regular contributor to The New American magazine and blogs frequently at www.LightFromTheRight.com, primarily on economics and politics.

Related article:

Canadian Workaround to Make Keystone XL Pipeline Irrelevant


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: drillbabydrill; energy; keystonexl; oil; palinwasright; pipeline; transportingoil
The delay in approving the final leg of the Keystone XL Pipeline is unnecessarily costing property damage and lives.
1 posted on 01/24/2017 8:26:57 AM PST by VitacoreVision
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision

Warren buffets alternative facts say otherwise.


2 posted on 01/24/2017 8:31:09 AM PST by momincombatboots (Pray for Sky, 20, two gunshots to abdomen, college student, hostess, easy prey n transformed US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision

Warren Buffet should be investigated for bribery. He paid off Obama and other to stop the pipelines which are competitors to his railroads for transporting oil.


3 posted on 01/24/2017 8:32:25 AM PST by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement, I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision

Trump just EO ram-rodded all the pipelines and also has a requirement to maximize the use of US steel in them.


4 posted on 01/24/2017 8:32:43 AM PST by headstamp 2 (Fear is the mind killer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision

Doesn’t this info belong in Settled Risk Management?


5 posted on 01/24/2017 8:40:26 AM PST by Paladin2 (No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision

President Trump, PLEASE approve pipelines quickly! Build, build, build! Drill, drill, drill! Mine, mine, mine!


6 posted on 01/24/2017 8:48:50 AM PST by backwoods-engineer (Trump won; I celebrated; I'm good. Let's get on with the civil war now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: momincombatboots

>> Warren buffets alternative facts say otherwise.
If you own truck, they sure would.


7 posted on 01/24/2017 8:52:37 AM PST by BuffaloJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision

Especially we had a couple of spectacular fires caused by oil train crashes recently.


8 posted on 01/24/2017 9:00:56 AM PST by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision

Pipelines are the best method to transport liquids and gases. That’s why LNG is a better form of energy than coal.


9 posted on 01/24/2017 9:46:58 AM PST by 353FMG (AMERICA IS ALL THAT TRULY MATTERS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision

They are the safest way to transport oil, if you don’t have issues with sabotage.
Which, unfortunately, between ‘environmentalists’ and trucking companies, may be an issue.


10 posted on 01/24/2017 10:14:43 AM PST by Little Ray (Freedom Before Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision

They are the safest way to transport oil, if you don’t have issues with sabotage.
Which, unfortunately, between ‘environmentalists’ and trucking companies, may be an issue.


11 posted on 01/24/2017 10:14:45 AM PST by Little Ray (Freedom Before Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision

just watch domestic terrorists AKA liberal progressive anarchists will try to make a mess of things


12 posted on 01/24/2017 11:04:40 AM PST by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision

New American needs to get writers and/or editors who understand geography. This line in their second paragraph really hurts their credibility:

“the Lac-Megantic derailment near Québec, Canada”

Lac-Megantic, is a town in Quebec, not near Quebec.


13 posted on 01/24/2017 11:23:52 AM PST by Fraxinus (My opinion, worth what you paid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson