Skip to comments.“Threading the Needle of a Global Security Debacle”
Posted on 04/12/2017 4:38:31 AM PDT by Kaslin
It continues to amaze me, perhaps not, how recalcitrant the media has been in not addressing the horrific global security situation that was bequeathed from the Obama administration to the Trump administration. The misguided vehemence in which the media has pursued a windmill called Russian intervention into our election is quite telling. Early into the Obama administration back in 2009 we were utterly inundated with the line of we inherited this mess, ok, it continued as an excuse until the final days. However, where are all those voices rambling on about the mess that Barack Obama left as he walked out the door, to the helicopter, for another farewell gathering, before being finally whisked away? Obama had more farewell tours and events than Kareem Abdul-Jabbar.
But the current deplorable situation we are now facing in the world is not just a byproduct of Obamas foreign and national security policy of obfuscation, denial, and dismissal. It goes farther back.
Last week President Trump took an action in the Middle East, it was rather simple to fire 60 TLAMs (Tomahawk Land Attack Missiles) at the airfield that was used to launch a chemical attack against innocent civilians. The grander question now becomes, what next? What is the Trump Doctrine for the Middle East? How will Mr. Trump thread a needle that many prior leaders have not exactly done well?
And that tale begins post World War I with the infamous Sykes-Picot Treaty that carved up a post-Ottoman Empire region. Instead of threading a needle, the European powers of England and France used a very broad crayon, paying little attention to the deep-seated schisms that had existed for centuries. And as we remember, just last week was the beginning of the War to end all Wars, we find ourselves focused in the same region that has become one of the most unstable, and dangerous.
It would be a good recommendation for Team Trump to go back and study the Sykes-Picot Treaty in order to assess the finer points, as they craft their Middle East strategy and vision. And this has to be a strategy that is not simply focused on the next election cycle, but rather the next 20-30 years, lest our children and grandchildren will look back upon our folly.
When one considers just Syria, this is not a simple case of a genocidal maniac, whose dad was as well. The plethora of players in that small country is expanding, and the situation is rather convoluted and can easily spin out of control, just as what happened some 100 years ago.
Syria is a place where state and non-state belligerent coexist, and they all have respective goals and objectives. First of all, the world cannot tolerate or allow for international norms, rules, and laws to be violated, such as the use of chemical weapons. But we must also come to grips with the fact that Syria is supported by two Nations that are fully complicit with the actions that have taken place, Russia and Iran.
Russia, under Vladmir Putin, seeks to reestablish itself in the Middle East, and Syria has been a standing ally. Putin wants that Mediterranean Sea port and wants to expand a footprint into the region, he was granted a pass due to President Obamas declared flexibility after his reelection. One thing that Putin is wary of is a long term drawn out engagement, such as the one that brought down the Soviet Union in Afghanistan. Therefore, Putin has sought out a regional actor, who also despises the United States, as an ally in Syria, that is Iran.
Iran aligns itself with Syria more along sectarian lines, the Alawite minority. And has used Syria as a support element for its operations into Lebanon. Iran is fully engaged with the deployment of its Revolutionary Guards Corps, and the terrorist organization, the Quds Force. Iran has also, by way of Bashar al Assads approval allowed deployment of Hezbollah into Syria to bolster his regime. It appears that those pallets of cash given to Iran by the Obama administration are going to good use by the Islamist regime in Tehran.
Iran needs Syria in order to extend its hegemonic dominance from Tehran through Iraq to the Mediterranean. In other words, they seek to create a power base from the Persian Gulf, do not forget Yemen on the Saudi peninsula, to another major body of water.
Not to be dismissed, as Iran is a Shia Muslim nation, there are Sunni factions seeking to thwart their efforts. Here is where deeper sectarian divides occur with the Sunni, al-Qaeda affiliated, Al Nusra Front and others looking to block those efforts and dethrone the Alawite-Shiite alliance in Syria. As well, based upon Islamic history, we have the savage terrorist organization, the Islamic State, which has sought to establish the Caliphate in Syria, at Raqqa.
The Trump administration must be careful in threading a needle in this small state. And I have not gone into depth discussing the interests of Turkey as opposed to that of the Kurds. And that the Kurds are split between Iraqi and Syrian Kurdish groups who also have internal issues between the YPG and PKK.
All this gives reason as to why the Trump administration cannot adopt a foreign policy such as Obamas dont do stupid s!@t, which in the end they did near-constantly.
This is not the art of the deal, it is graduate level geopolitics, and cannot be accomplished by tweet. We need not be embroiled in any major nation building or regime change endeavor with Syria, but the Trump administration must ask itself, what does the Middle East look like 30 years from now based upon our decisions? And we must end the deceptive illusion that we can supplant Jeffersonian democracies in that region.
The immediate objective is to defeat ISIS. Secondly, we must isolate Assad from his support of Russia and Iran, which can be done diplomatically and economically. We must reduce Russian and Iranian spheres of influence and their support to terrorist organizations. We can seek to set the conditions for the Syrian people to determine their own future and repatriate their countrymen and women back home. We need to make it very clear, whether Sunni or Shia, we will not tolerate or accept Islamic jihadism. We need to establish a NATO-like organization for the Middle East, and let leaders like those in Egypt and Jordan take a lead role.
We need to sit and consult with our best ally in the region, Israel, and ascertain from them, what does peace and stability in the Middle East look like. After all, Syria borders Israel and the actors operating there are not sympathetic to its existence. And we must solve the Kurdish issue, they would be a strong ally, as a buttress against Iran and jihadist infiltration, and perhaps keep Islamists from ruling in Turkey.
This is the needle that must be threaded, and President Trump must address the American people, and the world on his vision for doing so.
I disagree only on one point.
I don’t care to isolate Assad from Russia.
Russia leaves and all the non-ISIS Islamists will become supreme over Assad. In other words, right now it is only Russia that is keeping the Syrian Islamists from taking Damascus. I say let Russia continue to own the situation in Damascus.
We should focus on ISIS and on helping the Kurds in northern Syria.
The problem in the Middle East comes down to just one word; culture. The Muslim culture is an aggressive war cult. There can be no peace as long as the culture calls for constant conflict. Even if only one of the subdivisions survived, it would fall upon itself in constant conflict because...that’s their culture. An Israeli PM said, “If the Muslims didn’t have Jews to hate they’d have to invent us.”
All of the “causes” of conflict boil down to one thing, the people involved have been trained since birth to get along with no one.
The REAL problem is that we have allowed the muslims to butcher the Jews and ESPECIOALLY the Christian population of the ME countries to the point where they hardly exist anymore.
Without that leavening form of CIVILIZATION in that region, we end up with the God-awful mess we have today.
We should have STRICTLY limited all our financial AND political dealings with these countries to Christian or Jewish representatives ONLY. They would have been capable of dealing with the TRUTH—as the muslims are not. It would also have forced the muslims to deal with them and maybe—just maybe—have prevented what now is GENOCIDE.
Iran as the potential hegemon is one of the greatest falsehoods promoted by the establishment and their Israeli and Saudi patrons. Iran, a poor nation with a small military budget with a limited reach, is outnumbered and surrounded by the Sunni world militarily supported by its great American servant and de facto Israeli ally. Iran is looking for survival in a Sunni sea, not hegemony. Once Iran is out of the way, Israel is going to soon see a militant Sunni hegemony much more dangerous than Iran could ever be.
Why is West asserting what Krauthammer mistakenly implied yesterday? That the Russians WANT a Med naval base in the Med in Syria? IIRC, they have had one since I went to Officer Basic in the 80s. So, acknowledge, if you want, they might want to CONTINUE to enjoy having that base but to imply it is new concerns me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.