Posted on 04/20/2017 4:55:10 PM PDT by Texas Fossil
Being a celebrity is often associated with having a certain lifestyle. Fame often brings fortune, privileges, and opportunitieswhether they are career-related or not. Celebrities are thought to have an easier life, in which they get special treatment wherever they gowell, except for celebrities in Turkey who are Armenian, Greek, Kurdish, Jewish, or members of any other ethnic or religious minority. Sometimes, even being associated with them is considered unacceptable.
Ayhan Işık, for example, was the most beloved Turkish leading actor in the 1950s and 1960s. He was also a movie producer, director, script writer, singer, and painter. He was nicknamed by Turkish people the king without a crown a king who had to change his Armenian-sounding last name to be able to have an acting career.
His parents were originally from Salonika (now Thessaloniki, Greece). Born in Izmir in 1926, Ayhan lost his father at the age of six. His family then moved to Istanbul, where he attended the painting department of the State Fine Arts Academy. He first became a painter and graphic designer and worked for several magazines in Istanbul. According to his known biography, upon the insistence and encouragement of the editor-in-chief of Yıldız magazinefor which he was then workinghe entered an acting competition organized by the magazine and came in first. But before he entered it, he had a major concern: his last name, Işıyan, could have been perceived to be Armenian. This concern made him change his surname and adopt a Turkish one: Işık.
Thanks to his enormous talent, good looks, and charisma, he became a living legend in Turkish cinema and played in numerous movies. Işık died in 1979 at the age of 50, which shocked his family, friends, and fans.
Nubar Terziyan, another well-known actor from Turkey, was one of the few Armenian actors who did not change his name. He was devastated by the untimely death of Işık, who used to call him father. In 1979, Terziyan placed a notice in the Turkish newspaper Hürriyet, which read:
My son, Ayhan, this world is ephemeral. Death is the fate of us all. But you did not die. For you still live in our hearts and in the hearts of millions of people that you have left behind. How blessed you are. ( ) Your uncle, Nubar Terziyan.
Apparently, Işıks family was concerned, terrified, and even infuriated that the notice could have made people think Işık was Armenian. They responded with a public display of racism in a counter-notice in Hürriyet:
Important correction: Our dearest Ayhan Işık has nothing to do with the notice undersigned as your uncle. ( ) We regretfully announce as we see it necessary. -His family.
30 years later, Berç Alyanakziya, the son of Terziyan, gave an interview to Hürriyet in 2009 about the tension between his father and Işıks wife following his death. According to Hürriyet,
Events that happened right after he placed a death notice for Işık in the daily Hürriyet made him more sorrowful. Işıks wife, Gülşen, reacted negatively toward Terziyan, who wrote below the notice your father Nubar, as Işık called him. The reason was that the real surname of Işık was Işıyan, which had been kept a secret. Because the name Işıyan reminds one of an Armenian name, he changed it to Işık.
Terziyans son Berç Alyanakziya said the following about the reason for the wifes reaction: Everyone thought that Ayhan Işık was Armenian because of his real surname, Işıyan. When my father placed this notice and wrote your father Nubar, people thought that they were close relatives and Işık was an Armenian, too.
Because of this negative reaction, on June 21, Terziyan placed another notice in the paper in which he disclaimed his former notice.
But according to Professor Fatma Müge Göçek, Işıyan was indeed Armenian. She wrote in her 2014 book Denial of Violence: Ottoman Past, Turkish Present, and Collective Violence against the Armenians, 1789-2009:
Such silencing also occurred in the case of another famous actor, Ayhan Işık, who was also of Armenian origin but carefully silenced his ethnic identity.
One of the precautions many Armenians in Turkey take against racist attacks is to adopt a Turkish name to use in their social and job-related interactions with Turks. One was Kirkor Cezveciyan, an Armenian superstar of Turkish cinema. He was registered with his real name on his official identification card, but used a Turkish name for the screen: Kenan Pars. The journalist Nayat Karaköse wrote in 2008 after Parss death:
Pars was only one of the many Armenians who changed their names he was one of the hundreds of Armenians with two business cards. Some Armenians−particularly men−possess two business cards in Turkey. They have both an Armenian name and a Turkish one they later adopted. Armenianness is visible only within the [Armenian] community; it is not visible in public sphere. Particularly 20 or 30 years ago, this invisible Armenian phenomenon was even more widespread.
In an interview, Pars said that because he was a non-Muslim, he was not given guns while doing his compulsory military service in the city of Balikesir. Instead, he was given tools to dig.
Hürriyet noted a reality that speaks volumes about the level of racism and bigotry against indigenous peoples in Turkey: Most Armenian and Greek artists changed their names to Turkish names for the screen upon request of producers. Adile Naşit, one of the greatest actresses in Turkish cinema, was only one of them.
Known for her joyous and remarkable laughter, her family movies and her TV show in which she told children tales and stories, she was known by Turks as mother Hafize after a character she performed in one of her movies. But the mother of Turkish people was hiding something: her Greek roots.
Some internet sources claim that Naşit was of Armenian origin. But according to the official website of the Womens Museum Istanbul, Naşit was the granddaughter of a well-known Greek dancer, who was born in 1870 and known as Küçük Virjin. A graduate of the Galata Greek Primary School, Küçük Virjin was the first Greek canto dancer in the Ottoman Empire. Her husband, Yorgi, as well as her two sons− Niko and Andre−were all musicians. Her daughter, Amalia, also became a well-known canto dancer and theatre actress in the late Ottoman era.
Her granddaughter, Adela, Amalias daughter, was born in the Turkish Republic, which has been hostile to Greeks. She adopted a Turkish name, Adile, became Adile Naşit, and never used her real Greek name during her career.
The scholar Gönül Dönmez-Colin writes in her 2008 book Turkish Cinema: Identity, Distance, and Belonging:
The one-nation policy of the Turkish Republic established in 1923 made life difficult for all minorities. Many converted to Islam and kept their identity secret all their lives.
Like the Kurds and other ethnic minorities, non-Muslims have also been invisible in Turkish cinema. Several ethnic minority personalities made their mark in the industry, but often their identity had to be masked Nubar Terziyan (Alyanak) remains an important character actor in Turkish cinema with his lovable uncle image in over 400 films. Although he never hid his Armenian identity, very few people knew that Kenan Pars, who played the bad man in more than 500 films, was actually born Kirkor Cezveciyan. Sami Hazinses, who devoted 45 years to Turkish cinema, had to hide his Armenian identity (Samuel Uluç) all his life for fear of reprisals; his secret was discovered only at his funeral when the procession had to be transferred from the mosque to the church.
One could be the most peace-loving, law-abiding, and hard-working citizen of Turkey. One could even be unlimitedly talented, and have the best looks and work ethic. But sadly, ones non-Turkish roots are still a challenge in ones social life and career.
For one to have a safe life and a successful career in Turkey, he or she has to be Turkish and a Muslim. Turkishness and Islam are believed by much of the Turkish public to be intertwined. But if minority citizens still have the courage to keep their non-Turkish names and non-Islamic faith, they still know that they had better not be very outspoken about these things. Non-Muslims in Turkey through real-life experiences − are always taught to know their place.
The Turkish state has demonized Armenians, Greeks, Assyrians, Jews, Kurds, and other minority citizens to such an extent that it has made many of them carry their ethnic roots like a burden on their shoulders. It has turned their identities into giant faultseven crimes. That is what prevented these very talented people from proudly expressing and being who they really were.
But in Turkey? It is very common for Armenian, Greek, Kurdish and Jewish actors. Even for famous ones. Prejudice and contempt is systematically poured on anyone who does not hide his minority past.
With the elevation of Erdogan the Islamist to Dictator will it be worse? It is very possible.
2 of the images did not hot link. It might be clearer for those portions of the article to go to the link where it will be properly displayed.
In the 1990s, there was a genuine mood of renewal in Turkey. Many intellectuals were willing to talk about the national crimes of the past, and that is the first stage to coming to terms with them. After all - just about all nations have violent histories. But then, this neo-Ottoman chauvinism came back with Erdogan. He rose in power at the same time as 9/11, and Turkey has been a strange and malign influence on the 'war on terror' - look what is happening in Syria.
Interesting how the open - minded Turks have embraced diversity.
Oh, but they still contend there was no Armenian Genocide. They say is simply did not happpen. 1.5 million deaths? And they say it never happened.
Headshake, what crap.
Yes, Turkey and Erdogan were an integral part of the rise of ISIS. Along with Obama and Hillary.
Now he wants to Kill Kurds, claiming they are the terrorists. As he currently shelters many of the same Terrorists who were working for ISIS.
My hope is that Putin and Trump can choose a path of cooperation that leaves Erdogan totally exposed to his own crap.
The Turks should be converted and Turkey destroyed.
Why did Constantinople get the works?
Evidently, that’s nobody’s business but the neo-Ottomans.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.