Posted on 05/05/2017 6:00:17 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
#NeverHappyEver...Never mind, Trump put Gorsuch on the Supreme Court to protect religious freedom.
Ivanka and Jarrad got to him first. They are going to be his ruin if he doesnt start to respond better to the social conservatives who put him in office. Today we lost from consideration a Christian conservative potential nominee for Secretary of the Army. Homosexuals and Muslims squeeled and he withdrew from consideration after getting little public support from the McCain/Graham husband/wife team and no comments of support from the White House.
Yes!! It is the Juuuss!! The Juuuss ruin everything!
BS. If he keeps making Supreme Court nominations like Neil Gorsuch, social conservatives will be thrilled with him. That is the primary issue involving religious freedom -- putting judges on courts that uphold the First Amendment and will oveturn Roe.
Ryan, I don’t know you from a turd in the toilet, but I have grown to know and understand Donald Trump.
If he didn’t push for more at this time, he has his reasons, and it’s probably to eventually do better than you would think.
This is how he works. All I know about you is that you complain.
All of these Trump haters can vote for Clinton, the next time. Then, see if their prayers are answered.
After reading this I haven't a clue what your issue is other than you want something that Trump did not give you. I would love to know what that is.
Right now you just sound like another spewing #Nevertrumper
Trump just did more for religious freedom than any president has dared to in the past couple of decades. And people STILL bitch that he didn’t do enough.
He may have the same thought I have about trying to regulate the religious issue. It is part of our Constitution and it matters who is on the S.C. But there is a danger in directly giving E.Os. on religious freedom because of the Muslims. They would use it to their advantage as they do all of our laws. Keeping the court conservative is our only hope against Islam. They have a bad habit of using our laws against us.
“The E.O. that apparently is a non-E.O.”
Did you really expect President Trump to fix 50 years of leftism in 100 days? I’m still waiting for you to answer my question about Texas property rights along the proposed Mexican-Texas highway. You were sure hopped up about it seven years ago.
Answer my question...
Wrong author;
Matthew J. Franck is the Author and
Ryan T. Anderson is Editor
I don’t think wanting Trump to stand up to the alt-left makes someone a Trump-hater.
Great points. Calling up the Little Sister’s at the EO signing ceremony was not a small thing either. It shows intention too.
After reading this I haven't a clue what your issue is other than you want something that Trump did not give you. I would love to know what that is.
Yep, my thought exactly. Clickbait to get you to read all his other, probably just as poorly written articles.
And people STILL bitch that he didn’t do enough.
***
Of course they do. They wanted Yeb! or Lyin’ Ted. If Donald Trump personally overturned Roe, they’d be screaming that he betrayed us because he didn’t send in the army to carpet bomb PP clinics.
It’s not about conservatism; it’s about pique and butthurt, nothing more.
I see you woke the concern trolls up. He kept the EO simple because he needs the Congress to do its job and if he tried to ‘fix it all” via EO, some Federal “Judge” would smear crap on a paper and call it reason to stop the EO.
That’s our hope that he does that but where are his nominations for the lower courts? Many vacancies, few nominations.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.