Skip to comments.
Judge rules in favor of Hawaii in challenge to Trump travel ban
Hono Star Ad ^
| Star-Ad staff
Posted on 07/14/2017 12:31:43 AM PDT by LeoWindhorse
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
To: LeoWindhorse
So now Democrat judges are overturning the Supreme Court.
To: LeoWindhorse
22
posted on
07/14/2017 4:41:39 AM PDT
by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: LeoWindhorse
The SCOTUS has ruled. The administration should ignore this political hack judge and continue the ban.
23
posted on
07/14/2017 4:56:01 AM PDT
by
kenmcg
To: phoneman08
i think the 9th has warned this Obama -soros operative..
I suspect they will tell the dangerous creatire to stop.
If Sessions is done hiding under his desk this can
be stopped to this today but speedy or effective he is not.
24
posted on
07/14/2017 4:59:14 AM PDT
by
ncalburt
(ll)
To: Sacajaweau
Its not worthless..and its allowed. Thomas wisely predicted it
25
posted on
07/14/2017 4:59:25 AM PDT
by
RummyChick
(can we switch Don,Jr for Prince Kush and his flak jacket. From Yacht Party to Warzone ready to wear.)
To: LeoWindhorse
Who needs legislators and executives when one judge can do all that work?
26
posted on
07/14/2017 5:00:53 AM PDT
by
fella
("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
To: Redmen4ever
No.did people here not read the decision??????????.
Scotus did not define bone fide. Gave examples but no definition. Of course grandparents are bone fide relations.
However...we do have some reference in immigration law but the ban had expanded on that particular range
27
posted on
07/14/2017 5:03:09 AM PDT
by
RummyChick
(can we switch Don,Jr for Prince Kush and his flak jacket. From Yacht Party to Warzone ready to wear.)
To: LeoWindhorse
The Constitution provides Congress with the means of removing judges. They just don’t do it.
28
posted on
07/14/2017 5:05:13 AM PDT
by
fella
("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
To: fella
Trump and DOJ should say “I’m ignoring federal judge ruling and deferring to Supreme Court”
29
posted on
07/14/2017 5:15:23 AM PDT
by
salmon76
To: RummyChick
i read what Thomas said.
Trump and Sessions simply can stall until Oct and let the legal challenges get
thrown back to the 9th who will defer to the SC again .
They don't have to comply immediately to a this judges whims. .
30
posted on
07/14/2017 5:20:37 AM PDT
by
ncalburt
(ll)
To: LeoWindhorse
Why wouldn’t the Supreme Court immediately overrule that judge?
31
posted on
07/14/2017 5:23:23 AM PDT
by
Savage Beast
(You can drive coast to coast without ever crossing a district run by Democrats! MAGA = Renaissance!)
To: LeoWindhorse
In his ruling, Watson said, “The government’s definition represents the antithesis of common sense.”This is the same rationale that many jurisdictions once used to defy civil rights laws.
To: Savage Beast
our rulers on vacation until fall.
33
posted on
07/14/2017 5:55:41 AM PDT
by
ncalburt
(ll)
To: LeoWindhorse
DONALD TRUMP! If you read this, please respond as follows: Send ALL Muslim invaders to Hawaii.
34
posted on
07/14/2017 6:15:07 AM PDT
by
GingisK
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Hawaii’s been paid for with American blood. I’d rather see this bastard judge get impeached and put in jail.
35
posted on
07/14/2017 6:25:31 AM PDT
by
mrmeyer
(You can't conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him. Robert Heinlein)
To: LeoWindhorse
It does not matter. Trump can ignore this ruling. The SCOTUS has handed down their decision. The Dist Court has totally overstepped.
36
posted on
07/14/2017 6:53:30 AM PDT
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
To: LeoWindhorse
Wow. What a terribly written headline.
The state is not involved in the original ruling, or this effort to thwart it.
This is a Federal judge on the island attempting to over-rule a distinction placed on the action by the Supreme Court — the court superior to his. This is beyond stupid.
37
posted on
07/14/2017 6:57:54 AM PDT
by
KC Burke
(If all the world is a stage, I would like to request my lighting be adjusted.)
To: RummyChick
The Supreme Court grant cert (said it would pick up the matter) and stayed the injunctions in part. Justice Thomas, in his concurring decision, did warn:
The compromise [balancing test in the staying of injunctions in part] also will invite a flood of litigation until this case is finally resolved on the merits, as parties and courts struggle to determine what exactly constitutes a “bona fide relationship” …
To: LeoWindhorse
OK, prove that you're a grandparent. It would take at least 3 separate documents, 2 birth certificates and an ID that proves who you are. If there's a question about any one of the documents, then no entry.
39
posted on
07/14/2017 7:43:06 AM PDT
by
Family Guy
(A society's first line of defense is not the law but customs, traditions and moral values. -Williams)
To: Family Guy
Immigration law does have definitions for who can get an immigrant visa...not grandparents. But that is for immigration ..not visit.
Docs in third world countries are sketchy to begin with
40
posted on
07/14/2017 7:57:20 AM PDT
by
RummyChick
(can we switch Don,Jr for Prince Kush and his flak jacket. From Yacht Party to Warzone ready to wear.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
