Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

So Where Did North Korea Get That Souped Up Rocket Fuel?
Hotair ^ | 09/18/2017 | Jazz Shaw

Posted on 09/18/2017 9:50:03 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

On Friday, North Korea launched yet another ICBM on a test run taking it over Japan and into the Pacific Ocean. This one traveled more than 2,300 miles, further than the distance to Guam had they wanted to strike it. There’s increasing consensus that Kim’s missiles could reach the continental United States if he chose to take the shot.

Over the course of the debate as to what we should about this, a great deal of attention has been paid to a couple of things. One is the miniaturization of Kim’s increasingly powerful nukes and whether or not he can fit them on his rockets. The second is the advanced designs of the ICBMs themselves and how he mastered the technology so fast. But there’s a third factor I hadn’t been considering until I began reading some coverage of the question at the Boston Globe. It takes a tremendous amount of energy to hurl a missile that far and the fuel required to power such a flight is both volatile and hard to manufacture. Where did Kim get it?

When North Korea launched long-range missiles this summer, and again on Friday, demonstrating its ability to strike Guam and perhaps the US mainland, it powered the weapons with a rare, potent rocket fuel that US intelligence agencies believe initially came from China and Russia.

The US government is scrambling to determine whether those two countries are still providing the ingredients for the highly volatile fuel and, if so, whether North Korea’s supply can be interrupted. Among those who study the issue, there is a growing belief that the United States should focus on the fuel, either to halt it, if possible, or to take advantage of its volatile properties to slow the North’s program.

But it may well be too late. Intelligence officials believe that the North’s program has advanced to the point where it is no longer as reliant on outside suppliers, and that it may itself be making the deadly fuel, known as UDMH.

So we’re talking about UDMH. I’m not going to attempt a discussion here on the properties of Unsymmetrical Dimethylhydrazine because I couldn’t even pronounce those terms given several tries. They wind up mixing their compounds up with nitrogen tetroxide and liquid oxygen, producing some of the biggest bang for the buck you can get in terms of rocket fuel.

This isn’t something that just anyone can cook up in their home lab and at least until recently there were only a few places you could get it. It seems a safe bet that we’re not selling any of ours to North Korea, so suspicion immediately falls on Russia and the Chinese. If they’ve been supplying Kim with his rocket fuel (without which he probably couldn’t get a missile all the way to California) then that’s a problem. But even if they’ve stopped, it’s apparently believed that Kim has had enough time and enough of a supply to tinker with that they’re producing it now for themselves.

This report, combined with opinions offered to the New York Times from intelligence officials, reveals that both the Bush 43 and Obama administrations had knowledge of North Korea’s need for this fuel and their attempts to both obtain supplies from foreign powers and to master the technology required to produce it themselves. But no serious effort to disrupt those activities – either publicly through sanctions and diplomacy or by clandestine means – was ever put in place. And now, if the defense analysts are correct, it’s too late. Also, I checked with a chemist who knows about such things and, while difficult, if you have the knowledge and the raw materials, North Korea can probably do it, so it sounds more and more like they’ve got their own supply.

I suppose yelling at the Russians and the Chinese for giving Kim his fuel might make us feel better at this point, but that’s about all. The UDMH horse is apparently out of the barn and there’s no bringing it back. But if it’s any consolation, our U.N. Ambassador just said that North Korea “will be destroyed” if we have to defend ourselves. Here’s the video of that to keep you warm at night.

CLICK ABOVE LINK FOR THE VIDEO



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aerospace; missiles; nknukes; northkorea; rocket; third100days; trumpasia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 09/18/2017 9:50:03 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Speaking of Rocket Man.

Elton Jong II

‘And I think it’s going to be a rong rong time.

https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/70u3i8/jumpin_on_the_rocketwagon_so_to_speak/


2 posted on 09/18/2017 9:55:36 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Inernet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Kim-Chee?...................


3 posted on 09/18/2017 9:55:50 AM PDT by Red Badger (Road Rage lasts 5 minutes. Road Rash lasts 5 months!.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

UDMH isn’t any kind of breakthrough, as we used it in our Titan II ICBMs in the 60’s.

It’s the engine technology that should be of concern.


4 posted on 09/18/2017 9:56:05 AM PDT by G Larry (There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Okay, then we have one more target for our first strike.

If any of the major “must haves” can be denied Kim, he’ll have equipment sitting in North Korea with no place to go.

China, perhaps Russia, like the idea of a small nation like North Korea being able to strike the U.S.

It removes Moscow and Beiging from the list of retaliatory strike targets.

I don’t think there’s any doubt China and Russia are helping, and that is pretty much proven by Russia running cover for Iran, so it can also become a nuclear armed nation.


5 posted on 09/18/2017 10:08:25 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (DACA: Their dream, our nightmare... will the rule of law prevail or not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry
Agreed. The advantage of UDMH and MMH is either is hypergolic in the presence of nitrogen tetroxide or nitric acid. This technology was known and commonly used since the 1960s.

Besides rocket fuel, the F-16 and space shuttle, for example, use MMH for their APUs.

Seems the media reporting this is decades behind the technological reality.

6 posted on 09/18/2017 10:19:16 AM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Hillary! (Just throwing that out there...)


7 posted on 09/18/2017 10:36:12 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

“China, perhaps Russia, like the idea of a small nation like North Korea being able to strike the U.S.”

This is what I have been thinking all along. NK is not “alone” in this endeavor.


8 posted on 09/18/2017 11:04:10 AM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

No, I don’t think it is. I’ll bet it has been transferring a lot of information to Iran too. As has Russia IMO.

As I understand it, bombs have key signatures. That may be just movie madness, but if true, it would be very interesting if the N.K. nukes key signatures were almost identical to either Russia’s or China’s nukes.


9 posted on 09/18/2017 11:09:35 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (DACA: Their dream, our nightmare... will the rule of law prevail or not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pfflier

Well, at least rocket man is not using Dioxygen Difluoride. That would really give him some range.

http://library.sciencemadness.org/library/books/ignition.pdf


10 posted on 09/18/2017 11:44:08 AM PDT by fireforeffect (A kind word and a 2x4, gets you more than just a kind word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

11 posted on 09/18/2017 12:11:13 PM PDT by seawolf101 (Member LES DEPLORABLES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

More likely China than Russia.


12 posted on 09/18/2017 12:25:34 PM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Have the Clintons moved on from selling US rocket designs to the Chinese and US Uranium to the Russians?

Have they now started selling rocket fuel formulas to the NORKs?


13 posted on 09/18/2017 12:28:17 PM PDT by Vlad The Inhaler (World's Most Powerful Nation Falls To Invasion Of Mexican Peasants!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Iran, China, Pakistan.


14 posted on 09/18/2017 12:33:25 PM PDT by Harpotoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The author exposes his ignorance.

Liquid fueled rockets are not our worry.

It’s the solid fueled rockets that are an existential threat as they can be fired without staging or warning.


15 posted on 09/18/2017 1:16:08 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Let the NORKs have UDMH. If you even glance at it sideways, it’ll give you cancer.


16 posted on 09/18/2017 1:22:12 PM PDT by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

North Korea is the missile testing grounds for Iran.


17 posted on 09/18/2017 1:22:33 PM PDT by Saltmeat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

Titan II. Damascus incident, 9 mt bomb exploded from fuel leak caused by a dropped wrench. Warhead stayed intact.

75 ton door to the silo flew off like a Frisbee cutting down trees.


18 posted on 09/18/2017 1:37:27 PM PDT by Titus-Maximus (It doesn't matter who votes for whom, it only matters who counts the votes - Joe Stalin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Iran. NK is testing their nukes and rockets for them


19 posted on 09/18/2017 1:38:09 PM PDT by AppyPappy (Don't mistake your dorm political discussions with the desires of the nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

Look at:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hwasong-10

And then check out:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R-27_Zyb


20 posted on 09/18/2017 1:39:21 PM PDT by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson