Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Donna Brazile: DNC Didn't Actually Care About Russian Hacks
Front Page ^ | November 8, 2017 | Daniel Greenfield

Posted on 11/08/2017 10:16:58 AM PST by detective

That's consistent enough.

We know Obama didn't care. Hillary even attacks him over it. But her own DNC operation, which she controlled, didn't care either. The hacks only became significant retroactively when

A. Some actual damage was inflicted on the DNC by the release of emails.   ...and more importantly...

B. Hillary lost. And that led to a frantic search for someone other than Hillary and her people to blame. Had Hillary won, this would mostly be a non-issue.

Donna Brazile, the former DNC head, who is a casualty of both A and B, and is pushing back against Hillary and the Dems who dumped her with her new book, confirms that the DNC did not care.

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections; Russia
KEYWORDS: brazile; brazilebook; dnc; dnchacked; greenfield; wikileaks
The DNC did not care about Russian hacks because there never were any Russian hacks. The WikiLeaks information was leaked from an insider.

It is only later that they made up the phony story about Russian hacks and the phony story about Trump colluding with the Russians. The media dutifully repeated the lies from the Democrats. Then Mueller was appointed Special Prosecutor and empowered to pursue anything he wants for as long as he wants with no oversight and no control.

1 posted on 11/08/2017 10:16:58 AM PST by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: detective

There was no hack and they knew they had plugged the leak.
His name was Seth Rich.

RussiaRussiaRussia is the smokescreen to hide that.

2 posted on 11/08/2017 10:21:59 AM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents - Know Islam, No Peace -No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

I don’t recall a top level Democrat going against the Clintons. I will say that scandal material has never hurt them legally. I’m not sure how bad it hurt Hillary last year.

It would seem negative reports would hurt her, but even Obama wasn’t hurt by the negative things he was doing as president. He was re-elected despite them.

What I can’t shake, is the feeling this is all a manipulation. “Oh this has been aired in public, and there was nothing there.”

Hillary may ultimately be behind this.

Even the Seth Rich stuff is something that was already out there.

Is this actually a Clinton construct?

They manipulate the media better than anyone I’ve ever seen, and much of it is a media complicit effort.

Watch this all die off, and Clinton claim she is pure a the driven snow, because it’s all been aired, and there was no “there” there.

In a slightly different way, this has all been done before.

3 posted on 11/08/2017 10:24:53 AM PST by DoughtyOne (On 11/08/16, G. H. W. Bush voted for H. Clinton. G. W. Bush left the top slot open. Any questions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
There was no hack and they knew they had plugged the leak.

His name was Seth Rich.

Well said.

Let me add/remind us of the time factor in the data transfer, which indicated that the data had been downloaded locally rather than internationally, likely to a USB memory stick.

The wife tuned through CNN to peek at the alternate universe. They were discussing Trump's urging Pompeo and the intelligence agencies to meet with a non-governmental type who was espousing the local leak, not the Russians theory. What was interesting was how biased (no surprise) the CNN talking head were. The basic position was "How dare the President pressure these agencies, when there was unanimous agreement among these highly capable intelligence professionals that the leak was a Russian hack."

In other words, CNN's default position was to defend anything done under the prior administration that could be used to defame Trump. Any attempt he might make to offer an exculpatory analysis was therefore manipulation, obstruction, and further proof of his guilt.

The DC swamp is deep and fetid, and filled with nasty creatures.

4 posted on 11/08/2017 10:29:51 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine (White is the new Black.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Hillary may ultimately be behind this.

It's very plausible. I say that much has been orchestrated against the Trump administration from Day 1, solely for the purpose of discrediting them. Think about the "protests" against his first immigration "ban," the pussy-hatted marchers, and all of the other "resistors."

This has been done to obfuscate any matter that might stem from any type of legal charges that might be brought against them at some point. This may have had an effect of painting Jeff Sessions in a corner--not so much because he couldn't press legal charges, but because he was afraid of the political fallout.

Secondarily, it also takes the political wind from Trump's sails...he had no "honeymoon period" with the American people, because he is the antithesis of everything the Left stands for, and the Left wanted to restrict the damage he might've done to their "legacy."

5 posted on 11/08/2017 10:42:14 AM PST by Lou L (Health "insurance" is NOT the same as health "care")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lou L

I agree with your thoughts also.

6 posted on 11/08/2017 10:52:33 AM PST by DoughtyOne (On 11/08/16, G. H. W. Bush voted for H. Clinton. G. W. Bush left the top slot open. Any questions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: detective; All

The only time the perverts known as Democrats use a “radio active” response is when it became clear they were Trumped. Then his impeachment was the only way to go. That’s when they started mining cash from Putin’s uranium holdings . Cause if Hillary goes down and to the slammer Putin’s mining stock $$$$$$$$ goes goodbye..

7 posted on 11/08/2017 11:43:47 AM PST by mosesdapoet (Mosesdapoet aka L.J.Keslin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

All Federal ‘employees’ are swamp dwellers.

Any of them voting for klinton (all of them) should be FIRED...

Put Federal agencies in small towns in the U.S.

Put the IRS in Alaska somewhere.

Put the EPA in Death Valley.

Put the FBI in Enid, Oklahoma.

8 posted on 11/08/2017 11:56:46 AM PST by Huebolt (Learn Russian. They will be the only surviving civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: detective; Liz

Donna will be on Tucker Carlson tonight.

9 posted on 11/08/2017 4:22:06 PM PST by Libloather (Trivial Pursuit question - name the first female to lose TWO presidential elections!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson