Recordings Show Russian Officials Bribe Clintons, ‘Body of Evidence’ Warrants Investigations

Breitbart ^ | 15 Nov 2017 | Jeff Poor

[detective]

Shortened title.

Full title: Schweizer: Recordings Will Show Russian Officials Willing to Bribe Clintons, ‘Body of Evidence’ Warrants Investigations

In an appearance Tuesday on Fox News Channel’s “Hannity,” Breitbart editor at Large Peter Schweizer, president of the Government Accountability Institute and author of “Clinton Cash,” revealed there were audio recordings of Russian officials demonstrating they were willing to use “bribery” to get favors from the former President Bill Clinton and his wife former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

According to Schweizer, that included giving donations to the Clinton Foundation.

[detective]

The Clinton defense thus far has been pitiful. Essentially they say nine government agencies have reviewed this. That has nothing to do with bribery. The fact of the matter is bribery exists whether it’s a close vote or not. Hillary Clinton is also saying that she was not involved in the decision. She does not have a great track record of speaking the truth.

[IC Ken]

How many politicians and agencies does $ 150,000,000.00 buy?

[Pearls Before Swine]

Until there’s a video showing Hillary stuffing the check into her bra, I’m going to call meaningful investigation and action unlikely.

[Slyfox]

All of this stuff was not suppose to ever be an issue.

Hillary was gonna win and she had all her lackeys on-th-ready to squash ANY "allegation" that just might pop up after she got the presidency.

[ETL]

But, same as with ChinaGate, it was about more than money...

The Idiot's Guide to Chinagate

By Richard Poe

May 26, 2003

CHINA WILL LIKELY replace the USA as world leader, said Bill Clinton in a recent Washington Post interview. It is just a matter of time. Clinton should know. He has personally done more to build China’s military strength than any man on earth.

Most Americans have heard of the so-called "Chinagate " scandal. Few understand its deadly import, however. Web sites such as "Chinagate for Dummies" and its companion "More Chinagate for Dummies" offer some assistance. Unfortunately, with a combined total of nearly 8,000 words, these two sites – like so many others of the genre – offer more detail than most of us "dummies" can absorb.

For that reason, in the 600 words left in this column, I will try to craft my own "Idiot’s Guide to Chinagate," dedicated to all those busy folks like you and me whose attention span tends to peter out after about 750 words. Here goes.

When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, China presented little threat to the United States. Chinese missiles "couldn’t hit the side of a barn," notes Timothy W. Maier of Insight magazine. Few could reach North America and those that made it would likely miss their targets.

Thanks to Bill Clinton, China can now hit any city in the USA, using state-of-the-art, solid-fueled missiles with dead-accurate, computerized guidance systems and multiple warheads.

China probably has suitcase nukes as well. These enable China to strike by proxy – equipping nuclear-armed terrorists to do their dirty work, while the Chinese play innocent. Some intelligence sources claim that China maintains secret stockpiles of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons on U.S. soil, for just such contingencies.

In 1997, Clinton allowed China to take over the Panama Canal. The Chinese company Hutchison Whampoa leased the ports of Cristobal and Balboa, on the east and west openings of the canal respectively, thus controlling access both ways. A public outcry stopped Clinton in 1998 from leasing California’s Long Beach Naval Yard to the Chinese firm COSCO. Even so, China can now strike U.S. targets easily from their bases in Panama, Vancouver and the Bahamas.

How did China catch up so fast? Easy. We sold them all the technology they needed – or handed it over for free. Neither neglect nor carelessness are to blame. Bill Clinton did it on purpose.

As a globalist, Clinton promotes "multipolarity"– the doctrine that no country (such as the USA) should be allowed to gain decisive advantage over others.

To this end, Clinton appointed anti-nuclear activist Hazel O’Leary to head the Department of Energy. O’Leary set to work "leveling the playing field," as she put it, by giving away our nuclear secrets. She declassified 11 million pages of data on U.S. nuclear weapons and loosened up security at weapons labs.

Federal investigators later concluded that China made off with the "crown jewels" of our nuclear weapons research under Clinton’s open-door policy – probably including design specifications for suitcase nukes.

Meanwhile, Clinton and his corporate cronies raked in millions.

In his book The China Threat, Washington Times correspondent Bill Gertz describes how the system worked. Defense contractors eager to sell technology to China poured millions of dollars into Clinton’s campaign. In return, Clinton called off the dogs. Janet Reno and other counterintelligence officials stood down while Lockheed Martin, Hughes Electronics, Loral Space & Communications and other U.S. companies helped China modernize its nuclear strike force.

"We like your president. We want to see him reelected," former Chinese intelligence chief General Ji Shengde told Chinagate bagman Johnny Chung.

Indeed, Chinese intelligence organized a massive covert operation aimed at tilting the 1996 election Clinton’s way.

Clinton’s top campaign contributors for 1992 were Chinese agents; his top donors in 1996 were U.S. defense contractors selling missile technology to China.

Clinton received funding directly from known or suspected Chinese intelligence agents, among them James and Mochtar Riady who own the Indonesian Lippo Group; John Huang; Charlie Trie; Ted Sioeng; Maria Hsia; Wang Jun and others.

Commerce Secretary Ron Brown served as Clinton’s front man in many Chinagate deals. When investigators began probing Brown’s Lippo Group and Chinagate connections, Brown died suddenly in a suspicious April 1996 plane crash.

Needless to say, China does not share Clinton’s enthusiasm for globalism or multipolarity. The Chinese look out for Number One.

"War [with the United States] is inevitable; we cannot avoid it," said Chinese Defense Minister General Chi Haotian in 2000. "The issue is that the Chinese armed forces must control the initiative in this war."

Bill Clinton has given them a good start.

http://web.archive.org/web/20031001210123/http://www.richardpoe.com/column.cgi?story=125

[thulldud]

Until there’s a video showing....

If there were such a video, I'd hope never to see it.

[rdcbn]

The 9 government agencies story is a misdirection

The Dept of State and the President are the two major players and Sec of State Clinton had veto power over the deal

Hillary was paid to not oppose and to stay away , which she did for

[Golden Eagle]

I believe Clinton and Obama were in on it together. I’ve also heard the feud between them right now is because Hillary kept all the money. And don’t forget the major part that Mueller and Rosenstein, mixed in with Comey, may have played to cover it all up.

[SunkenCiv]

Thanks detective.

Breitbart editor at Large Peter Schweizer, president of the Government Accountability Institute and author of “Clinton Cash,” revealed there were audio recordings of Russian officials demonstrating they were willing to use “bribery” to get favors from the former President Bill Clinton and his wife former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

"WIlling to", not "did".

[GrandJediMasterYoda]

Overwhelming evidence of crimes committed by the Clinton crime family for decades and nobody does sh*t about it, but mere accusations against Moore without a shred of proof and the RINOcrats immediately try to destroy him.

[apocalypto]

Their defense is pitiful maybe because they count on the Uniparty and MSM to support them.

[Amish with an attitude]

Business could be booming for Special Councels.

[longfellow]

Just like LBJ.

[Pearls Before Swine]

Yah, I understand. But, if you were on her jury, you would have to do your duty and watch.

[timestax]

[detective]

I needed to shorten the title in order to make it fit. I included the complete title in the post.

[FourtySeven]

Yeah, that whole “not involved in the decision” line is a crock.

Does anyone really think whatever underling at the State Department That was technically “involved in the decision” wouldn’t or couldn’t be influenced by his or her BOSS there, the actual Secretary or State, at all!? It’s laughable on its face to suggest that.

What’s obvious is this person whoever it was who served as the State Department’s representative on the recommendation committee was some rubber stamp for Secretary Cankles, taking marching orders from her. There’s no way she didn’t have any influence in the decision making process.

And as for this whole “Obama was the one to make the actual approval the Committee just made recommendations” bunk, similar rational reasoning applies. Obama was more than eager to press the “reset button” (remember that, when the Democrats downplayed Romney’s assertion that the Russians are not to be trusted, made a fool out of him for saying that, basically mocking him, implying he “didn’t know the Cold War was over” remember that during the election? Remember how they all assured us how good the Russians were, how ironic now the very same Russians are the bad guys. Because just like then, it suits their agenda to claim whatever they want about the Russians. Or anyone.).

So Obama was eager to press that “reset button”, because of his screw up with the whole Ukraine fiasco, he wanted that swept under the rug, or maybe because he himself had some shady connections to some crooked Ruskies who knows (probably a mix of both). Regardless he was eager to press it and so was hardly an unbiased arbiter of the deal himself. So Clinton comes along (excuse me some lackey of hers comes along) pushes the deal through the committee responsible for making the “recommendation” to the president and wham-o: we have ourselves another crappy deal thanks to the geniuses Obama and Hillary Clinton.

So don’t let anyone tell you that just because Clinton didn’t sit on the committee that only gave a recommendation to Obama (who was technically in charge of making the decision about it), just because of all those legal facts divorced from the very real political (much less shady financial) context of the time, that she had nothing to do with it.

It totally ignores the very real fact that her “charity” suffered a massive loss in donations after her defeat in 2016. There is simply no explanation for such a precipitous drop in donations other than the fact that such “donations” were nothing of the kind. They were in fact payoffs by some savvy Russians who knew how and when to manipulate the American political climate to their advantage. It stinks to high heaven and only a dolt can’t smell it.

[catnipman]

“revealed there were audio recordings of Russian officials demonstrating they were willing to use “bribery””

uh, yeah. Anyone here heard these alleged audio recordings yet?

[Robert DeLong]

Not according to Jeff “Sgt. Schultz” Sessions. He see’s nothing.

[ForYourChildren]

“The Idiot’s Guide to Chinagate”

Thanks for posting this.

This is what the Clintons do - treason. They have been doing it for decades.