Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

And now come the calls for Clarence Thomas to step down
Hot Air.com ^ | December 6, 2017 | JAZZ SHAW

Posted on 12/06/2017 5:57:59 PM PST by Kaslin

It’s not the first time I’ve heard it, but after reading this op-ed from Jay Kaganoff in the Washington Post, I’m guessing we’ll be seeing more of it. After the cacophony of calls for Hollywood moguls and media figures to lose their jobs and elected officials to resign or be removed following allegations of sexual assault and harassment, it was inevitable that Supreme Court Associate Justice Clarence Thomas’ name would eventually come up.

Kaganoff titles his piece, Fellow conservatives, it’s time to call on Clarence Thomas to resign. The author makes at least a partially convincing case, depending on where you personally set the bar for convictions in the Court of Public Opinion. If allegations which can’t or won’t be tested before a jury are enough to remove senators, congressmen and movie studio chiefs, why not a Supreme Court justice? Kaganoff reviews the evidence from Thomas’ confirmation hearings and believes that Anita Hill’s claims pass the smell test.

It’s always a question of balance between believing the victims and avoiding mob mentality. But there are a few factors that tilt toward Hill’s version of the story.

It wasn’t exactly his word against hers; she had witnesses whom the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, Sen. Joe Biden of Delaware, did not call up. And Biden is a Democrat, so there goes the “they only attacked him because he’s conservative” narrative. He was confirmed by a Senate under Democratic control.

In an interview on CNN, conservative journalist Bethany Mandel talks about how coming forward affects women. “This will be the only thing these women are ever known for. That’s not something someone wants to sign up for.” Hill is a law-school professor with a respected career in her own right, but she has to carry this around with her — without even the satisfaction of having her harasser punished.

I would suggest we apply the same test to Thomas as we have to others in the spotlight such as Franken, Conyers and Moore. As to credibility, were there multiple victims making such reports? In this case it seems not. Did the accuser make the accusation or at least tell other witnesses at the time? Well, perhaps not at the time it happened, but contemporaneous witnesses were heard from. Did the accused own up to the deed and apologize? Not in this case, but neither have some others who are being called on to step aside.

There’s also the severity of the actions being alleged, keeping in mind that there is still a definite line between harassment and assault. Anita Hill told of some extremely brutish language which, if true, would certainly amount to harassment in 2017. But forcible, unwanted contact such as groping a sleeping woman’s breasts didn’t really come up so I suppose we’re on the harassment side of the fence here as opposed to assault.

I don’t know. I’m having a hard time mustering the same level of “They Must Go Now” reaction when considering the stories of Justice Thomas and Anita Hill, but if we believe her accusations they can’t simply be excused, either. The problem here is that Thomas has rejected all of these accusations all along. There’s no reason to think he would suddenly admit to the alleged deeds and sheepishly resign. At that point, you have no option to remove him from the bench short of impeachment. Would alleged but unproven harassment rise to the required level of offense for the House to bring the charges and the Senate convict him?

Color me skeptical on both counts, even if the Democrats held the majority in both chambers. And I’m not saying this out of convenience because he’s one of the conservative justices on the bench. Were he removed right now, President Trump would replace him with a new name off of his famous list and you’d have a new, probably younger conservative judge on the bench. This is a question of whether or not both Clarence Thomas and Anita Hill are being treated as fairly and impartially as is possible under the circumstances. And unlike Mr. Kaganoff, I don’t see such a clear answer on this one.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: clarencethomas; impeachment; sexualassault; sexualharassment; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

1 posted on 12/06/2017 5:57:59 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Democrats are such complete racists.


2 posted on 12/06/2017 5:58:48 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (Benedict McCain is the worst traitor ever to wear the uniform of the US military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

He’s so 1991.


3 posted on 12/06/2017 5:59:24 PM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Yep, Thomas has been f’n (figuratively) the libs regularly, against their will, for quite a while now.


4 posted on 12/06/2017 6:00:16 PM PST by Paladin2 (No spelchk nor wrong word auto substition on mobile dev. Please be intelligent and deal with it....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

DIMs/LIBs are lunatics...determined, criminal lunatics.


5 posted on 12/06/2017 6:01:22 PM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

While we take glee in Democrat’s and Hollywood’s foibles, we need to remember what goes around comes around.


6 posted on 12/06/2017 6:02:32 PM PST by buckalfa (Slip sliding away towards senility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

The proper response to political correctness is to laugh in their faces.

They won’t like us anyway even if we quaked in our shoes at their teeth gnashing.

Screw them.


7 posted on 12/06/2017 6:02:55 PM PST by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Yeah, they should be going after CT:


8 posted on 12/06/2017 6:03:16 PM PST by Slyfox (Are you tired of winning yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Color me skeptical on both counts, even if the Democrats held the majority in both chambers

The Dems cannot reach a supermajority in the Senate in 2018 even if they win every held GOP seat. Silly point.

9 posted on 12/06/2017 6:06:18 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Nope. Innocent.


10 posted on 12/06/2017 6:06:19 PM PST by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I recall reading about how Anita Hill constructed her story largely from a sexual harassment case that she studied in law school with Thomas as her professor.


11 posted on 12/06/2017 6:07:01 PM PST by OttawaFreeper ("If I had to go to war again, I'd bring lacrosse players" Conn Smythe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
If they're digging up that 25 year old pube-on-the-Coke-can allegation as the impetus for this farce, they must be seeing a lot of canvas at the bottom of the bag.

I'm not tired of all this winning yet. Not by a long shot.

12 posted on 12/06/2017 6:07:17 PM PST by Viking2002 ("If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck." - John Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I support this as long as we replace him with a 45 year old just like him.


13 posted on 12/06/2017 6:08:07 PM PST by MountainWalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne

The entire world is laughing at us. I have no clue how 20 years from now I am going to explain this to my grandkids.


14 posted on 12/06/2017 6:08:13 PM PST by EQAndyBuzz (BANNON YOU MAGNIFICENT BASTARD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

I’ll never forget how 60 minutes tried to shame him by informing us that he was married to (gasp) a white woman


15 posted on 12/06/2017 6:09:35 PM PST by Figment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OttawaFreeper

I watched the entire hearing. Hill was lying through her teeth


16 posted on 12/06/2017 6:09:52 PM PST by cyclotic (Trump tweets are the only news source you can trust.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Sexual predators (Bill Clinton, Bill Cosby, Harvey Weinstein) show a pattern of behavior over many years.

For Clarence Thomas, there is just one unlikely, politically-motivated accusation rightly dismissed as slander at the time it was made. It is worth pointing out the distinction.

17 posted on 12/06/2017 6:10:24 PM PST by Interesting Times (WinterSoldier.com. SwiftVets.com. ToSetTheRecordStraight.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buckalfa

Really, that’s what you want to say?

Bwahahahahahahahaha


18 posted on 12/06/2017 6:10:53 PM PST by Balding_Eagle ( The Great Wall of Trump ---- 100% sealing of the border. Coming soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
'Who left pubic hairs on my Coke?' amounts to sexual harassment, a hostile workplace, and a person unfit to be a Supreme Court Justice. Thomas should resign.




19 posted on 12/06/2017 6:11:18 PM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Figment

The Democrats like to pretend that they are not still acting like it’s the 1920s. But they are. For them, Jim Crow never really ended.


20 posted on 12/06/2017 6:11:19 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (Benedict McCain is the worst traitor ever to wear the uniform of the US military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson