From what I can tell, Jordan’s performance is as a legislator (Rep in Congress) not as a judge (”judiciary”).
You did fine posting the title and the link, but include an excerpt next time.
Jordan is a “real” star, not like Issa and Gowdy. He ripped Wray’s balls off today, and Wray, who sadly looks to be another Jeff Sessions deserved it.
There is something rotten in the state of our national government. Its policies have been turned against the American people and its powerful agencies have been turned into instrumentalities of corruption.
Show me the application, dude — that was the underlying demand from Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan to FBI director Chris Wray during House Judiciary hearing to determine a little bit more about Peter Strozk, the just-fired Robert Mueller attack dog.
Er, make that unbiased special counsel team investigator — right?
Hold the phone on that one. The water’s getting deep and murky. Jordan’s got the goods on that. Or at least, a theory that’s rocking, to say the least.
He’s always like this. And unlike Issa, Gowdy and Chaffetz, he’s a *closer*, not a chaser.
Good question, what was the application date of the FISA warrant and was it requested by Strzok.
It’s time for a resolution from house asking trump to fire wray and start over.
Jordan to be on Lou Dobbs soon.
Wow let’s hope for more....
Jim Jordan should be the Attorney General of the United States!
Rep. Jim Jordan calls for second special counsel over FISA warrant on Trump aides!
By Sally Persons - The Washington Times - Thursday, December 7, 2017
Rep. Jim Jordan said Thursday that an additional special counsel needs to be appointed to look into how a FISA warrant was obtained to look at members of President Trump’s campaign team.
“The only logical way to get to the answers for the American people is to appoint a second special counsel. And if the attorney general is not going to do it, frankly, I don’t think he should be the attorney general,” Mr. Jordan, Ohio Republican, said on Fox News.
Mr. Jordan wants the release of the application to secure the FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) warrant to see if the dossier, funded by Mr. Trump’s political opponents, was used to justify the warrant.
FBI Director Christopher Wray is set to appear on Capitol Hill Thursday before the House Judiciary Committee, and Mr. Jordan said he expects answers on this probe.
Mr. Wray was not head of the FBI at the time the warrants took place.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/7/jim-jordan-calls-for-second-special-counsel-over-f/
Rep. Jordan Grills FBI Director: Did Agent Who Sent Anti-Trump Texts, Bring Dossier to FISA Court?
“Let’s remember a couple of things about the dossier,” Jordan replied. “The Democratic National Committee and the Clinton campaign, which we now know were one and the same, paid the law firm who paid Fusion GPS who paid Christopher Steele who then paid Russians to put together a report that we call a dossier full of all kinds of fake news, National Enquirer garbage and it’s been reported that this dossier was all dressed up by the FBI, taken to the FISA court and presented as a legitimate intelligence document — that it became the basis for a warrant to spy on Americans.”
Excerpted! For full text/story go to the link below:
At the end, the article says that the FISA application itself is NOT a classified document. If that is true, why can’t Congressman Jordan go to wherever the FISA court conducts business, ask the clerk of the court for a copy, and persist until he gets it? No need to inconvenience the FBI.
We have all seen many wonderfully orchestrated sessions of congressional representatives asking pointed questions and not getting a single answer or having an effect on the situation. Rep Jordan did ask the questions that needed to be asked. And once again, no answers were given.
Thinking the FBI should be disbanded for corruption and all the employees fired.
Saw it live.
Jim Jordan did a masterful job of outlining the apparent corruption in the FBI, DOJ and Muellar’s witch hunt team of Clinton supporters who are all anti-Trump.
The with hunt team is trying to find anything against Trump.
Bottom line might be that the biased team will find nothing, and that will be better than if the investigators were pro-Trump.