From Lame Cherry's blog
Posted on 12/08/2017 8:48:37 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
Well, we knew this was coming. Why add the “D.A.” ??
Doing so proves an intent to mislead.
I doubt we’ll be hearing a re-reclarification.
#20. Gloria Allred can’t be Jewish. She’s a pig, P.I.G., PIG!
This kosher kids knows treif when he sees and smells it, and Allred is Treif with a capital “T”. (so says Robert Preston).
Yeah, sounds plausible!
When I was in junior high school, forty-some-odd years ago, I went around to all the kids and teachers who had been unfriendly or even outright hostile to me, and had them sign my yearbook.
I then immediately added useful identifying information (their full name and address, their professional capacity 40 years later, etc.) right next to their signatures so that, sometime in the 21st Century, I would remember that they had been "mean" to me, and could take the appropriate legal action.
Regards,
That may be, but:
It was Rathergate that brought me to FR in the first place. Rathergate taught us all that document experts can't really give an opinion unless they examine the actual document. Alred knows this: That's why she won't let anyone examine the yearbook for real.
And of course, the day after the alleged event, she quit her job.
P.S. Looking at the 1977 school calendar and her time line, it is likely that Dec 22nd was the first day of the Christmas Vacation and the day she quit was likely the last day of that vacation.
Where was she really on December 22nd?
Cuz she added “Moore” and “D.A.” just like on her court papers.
“Because the sexual assault she alleges happened wasn’t memorable enough on its own.”
That’s what I’ve wondered all along - why isn’t this note blacked out, scribbled out, or torn out? What victim neatly preserves her assaulter’s sweet nothings?
The idiot told them what they wanted to hear and is now fighting to maintain his “creds”....delicious....
From Lame Cherry's blog
You are absolutely correct. Nothing can be done without comparison handwriting samples. These samples are best if they were from previous writings vs. current exemplars. Songer made that clear. It was easy to obtain prior writings. If signature, then DL used. Possible letters, contracts, etc... I was very impressed. Prior I have worked with all types of experts. They basically say what they are paid to say.
So Nelson or an accomplice tried to carefully duplicate the Roy Moore signature stamped on her divorce document, including the “DA” that followed it. While, in their ignorance, they never knew the significance of the “DA”, and that, by Roy Moore or anyone else, it would have never appeared with his signature at the time he allegedly signed the yearbook.
What can’t be said for certain, yet, is what role Allred herself might have played in Nelson’s forgery.
Well, we knew this was coming. Why add the “D.A.” ??
_________________________________________________
You may have missed this, it was in the story. It turns out that Moore was the judge in a divorce for Mrs Nelson. While he was never the DA and never signed DA after his name, when he was the judge his clerk signed papers for him with a stamp of his signature. The clerk would always put her initials after his stamped signature so people would know that it was her that did it, here name Deborah Adams, DA.
So, when Nelson needed an example of Moore’s signature to use in a forgery she simply pulled out the divorce papers and copied the signature as best she could from the example she had.
Stupid people is what Alred and Nelson are.
Yep. Heard that on FOX when the news broke.
For forty years!
He didn’t say it WAS his signature only that it appeared as his signature. I heard (not sure as to veracity) that she copied his signature from her divorce papers that then-Judge Moore signed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.