Posted on 01/23/2018 5:33:44 AM PST by Kaslin
No one is paying much attention, but Congress is preparing a two-year budget that would blow past bipartisan spending caps to the tune of $216 billion through 2019.
That might be a best-case scenario. The budget watchers at FreedomWorks estimate that when hurricane disaster relief, funding for the border wall, added Obamacare money for the bankrupt insurance markets, and other last-minute spending "emergencies" are thrown in the mix, the two-year spending blitz could exceed $300 billion.
President Donald Trump had better get his veto pen handy.
All of this is happening because Republicans have fallen into the Democrats' fiscal trap. To secure more money for national defense, Democrats are demanding an equal amount of extra funding for domestic social welfare programs. So to get an additional $108 billion for the Pentagon, the Republicans may agree to another $108 billion-plus in ransom money for domestic agencies. But when all the emergency funding is included, the ratio could be closer to $2 of additional domestic spending for every $1 of increased military funding. What a deal.
If this deal were to get cut, any pretense of fiscal discipline and debt control would be officially and irrevocably washed away. "Almost no one here on either side of the aisle wants to control spending," Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky tells me. "It's sad, but it's the new reality."
This is happening when the $4 trillion federal budget is expected to exceed $5 trillion within eight years. The $20.6 trillion debt is already headed to $30 trillion over the next decade -- even without this new spending spree.
This would also be a nail in the coffin of the Budget Control Act of 2011, which instituted spending caps and sequester cuts if those caps are exceeded. The BCA caps have worked remarkably well as a deterrent to the very kind of spending blowout that Congress is considering.
After the BCA was installed, during Barack Obama's first term as president (and after Republicans seized control of Congress), federal spending fell for three years in a row -- from $3.6 trillion in 2011 to $3.51 trillion in 2014. That was the first time that had happened since the 1950s. The caps have shaved more than $1 trillion from the spending that was supposed to happen without them.
Given that the caps are a success, why scrap them now?
The answer is that the caps have worked too well. The pro-spending lobby in both parties has come to despise the fiscal handcuffs of budget caps and the threat of across-the-board sequester cuts.
This fiscal retreat has exposed fiscal hypocrisy on both sides of the aisle. Republicans purport to be the party of fiscal responsibility and limited government, but they are all too eager to be removed from the BCA cage. Meanwhile, Democrats, who unanimously moaned that the Trump tax cuts would blow a hole in the deficit (ignoring the impact on the economy), are willing accomplices in this fiscal jailbreak, which would cost the Treasury much more in the long term.
But it wouldn't be Democratic leaders Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi who would get blamed for the financial mess left behind. Voters would surely wonder why Republicans, who are in charge, let this surge in spending and debt happen on their watch.
A $300 billion spending spree would be no way to drain the swamp. But it would be a good way for the GOP to find itself back in the minority after this year's midterm elections. President Trump may want to use his veto pen to save Republicans from themselves.
The partisan anti-wall douche nozzle throws wall funding in there like it is a big expense. The cost of a wall over 4 or 5 years is around $4B per year and hardly even a budgetary rounding error and shouldn't be included in that list. Stopped ready this BS right there.
Deficit? Why worry? The market is up while taxes and unemployment is low. Hey kick the default can down the road. Happy days are here again !!!! Sarcasm /
So one company,Apple, is repatriating $350B and these folks are getting all hyper about $300B over 2 years? Obviously They are not used to the Trump universe.
I don’t hear much about repairing our crumbling and outdated infrastructure anymore. Are our roads and bridges and airports and electric grid really in need of repair, or is this all a ruse?
0bamacare was never - and will never be - repealed, despite the fact it was designed to not only cripple the economy, but to all but eliminate the middle class. Does anyone care?
Tax cuts and deregulation will take us only so far, and 0bamacare will eventually outstrip those benefits.
This backfired on the Dems...anchor babies, visa lotteries and "bring the whole family" (not) are all in play. DACA is the least concern on the immigration menu.
Those pikers! The Democrats only care about spending when they aren’t in charge. $216 billion is less than a quarter of a Trillion and the economy isn’t even shrinking. Get over it. Just think of the votes that could be purchased with twice that amount.
The Senate hasn't acted on either. McConnell should bring those bills to the floor right about now.
And the annual maintenance cost on our current inventory of illegal immigrants is said to be over well $100 billion.
Ack! over well = well over
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.