The measure was drafted with the aim of reversing declines in college enrollment across the state, which fell nearly 14 percent from 155,065 enrolled students in 2010 to 133,830 in 2016.
Loss in revenue...
“Loss in Revenue” not withstanding, there are too many high school grads that do not belong in college, can’t do the work and are not interested in putting forth the effort to get a degree. Tell the colleges to strip down their faculties to what is needed, cut costs and make a college education affordable to those who can DO THE WORK!
""The measure was drafted with the aim of reversing declines in college enrollment across the state, which fell nearly 14 percent from 155,065 enrolled students in 2010 to 133,830 in 2016.""
Loss in revenue..."
That doesn't address who would pay the tuitions. Every kid being required to enroll in college?
I guess those who are able to pay would pay and all the tens of thousands who wouldn't be able to pay would be funded by... the taxpayer? Well, New Mexico would surely get a lot more revenue if that's the case. At the hapless tax payers expense.
Bingo You win the award for pointing out again, “Follow the Money!”.
Sometimes they let the truth sneak in...
The measure was drafted with the aim of reversing declines in college enrollment across the state, which fell nearly 14 percent from 155,065 enrolled students in 2010 to 133,830 in 2016.
Loss in revenue... and probably not a single college employee was laid off.