Catherine Herridge is breaking this down on FoxNews at present.
"Russia, Trump is bad, Russia, Trump is bad, Russia, Trump is bad, Russia, Trump is bad, Russia, Trump is bad, Russia, Trump is bad, Russia, Trump is bad, Russia, Trump is bad, Russia, Trump is bad, Russia, Trump is bad, Russia, Trump is bad, Russia, Trump is bad, Russia, Trump is bad, Russia, Trump is bad, Russia, Trump is bad, Russia, Trump is bad, Russia, Trump is bad ..."
Bookmark
Did they release it on Twitter?
After all, it is at their level, and the level of their supporters.
countdown to backfire...4..3..2..
ping!
Democrat rebuttal memo is nothing but trash.
"Give me what I want, or more witnesses will die,
more children will be given the Schiff-Standard rape,
and I will leak more intel to America's enemies."
So the defense is that the DOJ lied about the fact that they were lying about a pack of lies fabricated by a couple of liars.
Slightly off topic but on a related subject - ever since the Republican memo was released, have the Democrats/Propagandists ever revealed what part of it was a threat to national security? Remember, that was their justification for trying to have its release blocked. Now that it’s been released, have they ever pointed to any portion of the memo to back up their claims? (e.g. “See. The first paragraph, third sentence reveals ****** which will now seriously harm national security). Or did they just move on, hoping people would forget their blatant lie?
well, the first paragraphs seem to have already convicted Page of crimes without due process.
It also neglects to mention that Page was a paid employee of the FBI when he was ‘questioned’ in Mar 2016. So, if Page was an employee, and he traveled to Moscow three months later, was he traveling as a paid employee of the FBI?
It also states that the FBI never paid for the salacious dossier. Isn’t that incorrect?
(now on to the rest....)
Just turned on CNN. The anchor was talking about how Nunes’ memo was “poorly written” and mentioned “conspiracy theories.” She was saying that the dossier was only one of many pieces of evidence used to obtain the warrant to spy on Trump’s associates. She also pointed out that it was renewed several times. Some of this is contrary to what’s been reported. If the underlying documents show what she’s saying to be false, will she and the rest at CNN cover the facts or will they embarrass themselves?
Now the male anchor is reporting that Schiff is saying the redactions to the Dem memo are not to protect sources and methods but are hiding facts. The female anchor just talked about Schiff as supporting the Justice Department as “not politicized and staffed by professionals” or words very similar to that.
Catherine Herridge pointed out a claim in the Dems’ memo that is at odds with Comey’s testimony. I don’t remember exactly what it was.
The people need the FACTS.
Does the Demonicrat rebuttal come with a roll of toilet paper... or is it already on the toilet paper?
Pg. 2 of the Schiff memo claims that the FBI only became aware of the contents of the Steele dossier in September 2016. That appears to be a lie. My understanding is that Steele was feeding this info to the FBI as he produced it. The FBI was aware of elements of what eventually became the dossier from June/July 2016.
The Schiff memo has one piece of real news: again on pg. 2 the memo claims that by September 2016, the FBI had “...opened sub-inquiries into [redacted] individuals linked to the Trump campaign: [redacted - but apparently naming those individuals]...and Carter Page.”
If the FBI was spying on multiple members of the Trump campaign, the FBI needs to name those people and explain why.
I started reading it, but eyes glazed over, so I have to no comment on this one.
The White House released an immediate counter-rebuttal.
“This politically driven document fails to answer serious concerns,” said White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders. “The Minority’s memo fails to even address the fact that the Deputy FBI Director told the Committee that had it not been for the dossier, no surveillance order would have been sought.”
