Posted on 02/24/2018 11:24:47 PM PST by familyop
She supported Obama and was very “proud” that he was elected.
As if anything else need be said about her.
We need to reconsider the RKBA?
Funny how no one says that about the First Amendment?
If freedom is outdated today, it will always be outdated.
Not a position I hold.
Ahhhh, George W. Bush: the “gift” that keeps on giving. /s
Promote it to First Amendment.
Boy you got that right.
sigh
She can add herself to the list of people who have no clue as to why the Second Amendment is vitally important to a free people. My advice to everyone is to have a concise and complete explanation of what this issue means to you, ready for whenever it is a topic for debate.
Cut through the bilge thrown at us by totalitarian leftists, and make it clear once and for all, why this is a human right; the right to defend one’s life, family, property, community and nation. We can never afford to negotiate this right away.
No we do not. It s exactly where it should be at any and every generation.
A few hundred million lying dead across the world killed by governments ought to be lesson enough. But then she’s a New World Order One World Government type.
I don’t need to do anything, I am a free man.
His nomination began my gravitation to Independent; the P3 incident cemented the decision.
GW fawners have a disease with correlation to liberalism.
FUCR
New World Order sociopaths
Condi Rice defines useful idiot.
The shame is she is a useful idiot pitching for the wrong side.
We know that the purpose of the 2A is to provide the
citizens a way to oppose a tyrannical government. Given
the current situation which finds this nation at risk
of a potential illegal coup attempt by the former
administration along with the leadership of certain
governmental security agencies the REAL purpose of
the Second Amendment could feasibly come into play for
really the first time at least since the Civil War.
It is a good time for Ms Rice to sit down and shut the
hell up.
Only an idiot would work for Bush
[quote}The incident took place ten weeks after the inauguration of George W. Bush as president and was his first foreign policy crisis. Both sides were criticized following the event; the Chinese for making a bluff which was called without any real concessions from the American side other than the "Letter of the two sorries," and the U.S. first for being insensitive immediately after the event and later for issuing the letter rather than taking a harder line[/quote}
FISH ON!
Give me an effin break. The crew should have been court martialed.
The response was lame, just like the POTUS.
Thank you! And oh yes, an explanation. The following is an easy, quick read. It will bestow an outstanding new clarity on each reader. No one should miss it.
Is The Second Amendment Worth Dying For?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3633354/posts
And by the way, “well regulated” means well equipped and well trained. Get ready, fellow Americans. Foreign invasion is not less likely after a nuclear conflict. It’s far more likely. Trust me, brothers and sisters. I did without some of our comforts to learn that.
The day you prepare to bury your guns is the day you should start using them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.