Posted on 02/26/2018 8:01:49 PM PST by Az Joe
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968161631845998592
NRA Verified account
@NRA
Follow Follow @NRA
More
While the anti-gunners have stepped up their attacks on the NRA, many on the right are rushing to the NRAs defense. So, to all of our supporters, we thank you! #TweetYourNRAMembership #StandandFight #DefendtheSecond #2A #NRA
8:31 AM - 26 Feb 2018
2,788 Retweets 8,143 Likes
Boycotts Against NRA Have Backfire Effect, Galvanize Conservatives
http://dailycaller.com/2018/02/25/nra-boycott-backfires/
CPAC 2018 - Dana Loesch
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3LYrg-BBJc
Israel is the perfect lock-stepping Obama Democrattotally progressive in word and deed.
The Democrats biggest problem is keeping this blabber-mouthing narcissist away from the media til they can decide how to dispose of him.
But it may be too late-hes already starring in slews of Republican campaign ads.
Democrat candidates are running for the hills away from him as we type.
Let's ask the Miami Herald.
Miami Herald
Letters to the Editor
3511 NW 91 Ave.
Miami, FL 33172
PHONE (1-800-843-4372).
When accused of corruption awhile back, Israel replied with his usual arrogance: “Lions don’t care about the opinions of sheep.”
Before another tax dollar is handed over to this Sheriff, taxpayers need reassurances Israel has not been playing hanky-panky with their hard-earned tax dollars.
In 2013, Sheriff Israel entered a collaborative ‘sanctuary’ agreement with other county officials and the Broward County school board to not arrest or prosecute juvenile delinquents in order to lower the stats of minorities incarcerated and meet federal quotas by which they received additional federal funding.
Tax dollars received under false pretenses need to be exposed. Taxpayers demand the Sheriff’s Office books be audited at once. The Sheriff runs the largest fully accredited sheriffs office in the country, oversees nearly 6,000 employees, has an annual budget of $730 million tax dollars, and holds enormous political power.
The Bank Secrecy Act should be mobilized——to follow the paper trail and determine how money changed hands among (a) the Sheriff’s Office (b) L/E projects, (c) and/or political activities.
Taxpayers demand that the scope and dimension of collusion in sub rosa deals be examined, as to who might be personally profiting and if financing domestic terrorism is being facilitated.
<><> L/E needs to examine bank accounts of the aforementioned.
<><> Joint bank accounts might be used to facilitate the transfer funds from one account to another, and/or wire-transferred offshore;
<><> To cover their tracks, fake invoices might be created to show that money deposited into Sheriff’s Office accounts was being used for legitimate purposes.
<><> Financial schemes scheme might be advanced by issuing phony statements of payments from financial sources that actually covered the transfer of funds for insiders’ personal use and/or for financing domestic terrorism.
Shady banking transactions could be prosecuted under the (1) Bank Secrecy ACT, (2) RICO, and, (3) the Hobbs Act.
<><> L/E should get ahold of: (1) copies of Sheriff’s Office checks, (2) wire transfers, (3) account statements, (4) invoices, (5) bills, (6) delivery tickets, (7) SPLC correspondence including snail mail, e-mail, mobile devices, cell phones, (8) contracts, (9) loan agreements, (10) other account books or official records.
L/E should also explore (a) monies paid to brokers, sub- brokers, (b) family members, (c) mortgage brokers, (d) financial managers, and, (e) real estate agents, brokers, and developers.
<><> L/E should scrutinize bank accounts for suspicious activities: (A) large deposits, (B) funds transferred from one account into another, (C) frequent requests for withdrawals.
<><> Sheriff’s Office bank records might also show diversions to secret LLC accounts, to money launder and to operate personal ventures;
Tax fraud may also be a factor, facilitated by withdrawals, gift cards purchases, credit card purchases and intra-bank transfers from legal bank accounts into personal accounts, or redistribution schemes.
<><> A huge tip-off is whether withdrawals support luxurious lifestyle including payments for real estate, investment and stock holdings, jewelry, luxury vehicles, resort travel....... and gifts and purchases from luxury outlets.
NOTE: Falsifying official govt documents is the criminal MO to hide larger crimes.
Sheriff Israel loves being in the spotlight ......reveling in his new found celebrity on the backs of 17 dead teens.
Now his peculiar utterances, his self-aggrandizement, and inanities about candy and nuts, have people wondering how a jerk like that is expected to protect the citizens....let alone handle $750 million tax dollars in his Broward L/E budget.
Dammit, I KNEW it.. finally found out where he was born.. He is from New York, where his father was a homicide Detective.
Must be all of those yanks that voted him in :/
(Roger Stone also helped him win that one)
BROWARD COWARDS !
Apparently, Twitter has blocked the “Fire Israel” petition...
He’s up for re-election this year. It should be easy to beat him with a GOP candidate. The investigation report will be leaked just before the election, he’s toast.
Because the word fewer applies to things that can be counted, but less applies to things that are continuous or cannot be counted. For example, Sheriff Coward might have fewer guns than you, but does he have less courage? Probably both. :-)
Since Sherriff is an elected position, where is the recall petition from the community?
Why haven’t they started that yet?
Great explanation——thank you so much-———more proof that we are never too old to learn.:-)
.
There are some unexplainable (since I am not an English major) rules about when to use “Less” or “Fewer”.
I graduated college in 1985, for reference to when I learned things in schools (back before they were destroyed by the left).
I find “less” and “fewer” get used wrong all the time, especially in ads on TV. Often the ad company wants to use “more” and then wants to use “less” because it sounds better for their ad.
“There are fewer calories” is correct.
“There are less calories” is not correct.
One could however change the statement a little and make “less” work.
“The calorie intake is less with this product.”
Notice how if I use “fewer” in place of “less” in that sentence, it does not make sense.
“The calorie intake is fewer with this product.” —that is glaringly wrong grammar, of course.
Another thing that is commonly done wrong “these days” (yes I am OLD) is people end a word with “ly” when they should not and do not use it when they should.
To take something “seriously” is correct,,,,to take something “serious” is not.
Oh my old English teacher would be proud, but she is probably dead by now.
Lots of people use “your” and “you’re” interchangeably, most of the time opting for the easier “your”. Of course “you’re” is really “you are”, but a whole lotta people just use “your” and go on with their day. Hey, these days grammar and spelling are not at the top of the survival list!
Thanks for your post, hope that wasn’t too long of a reply.
Cheers!
Thanks for your great reply-———very informative.
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.