Skip to comments.BRITAIN MAY JOIN U.S. STRIKES AGAINST SYRIA IF CHEMICAL WEAPON USE PROVEN
Posted on 02/27/2018 4:08:37 PM PST by Roman_War_Criminal
Britain would consider joining US military strikes against the Syrian government if there is evidence chemical weapons are being used against civilians, Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson said on Tuesday.
Johnson said he hoped Britain and other Western nations would not stand by in the event of a chemical attack, voicing support for limited strikes if there is "incontrovertible evidence" of the Syrian's government involvement.
"If we know that it has happened, and we can demonstrate it, and if there is a proposal for action where the UK could be useful then I think we should seriously consider it," Johnson told BBC radio.
Over the past week, Syria's army and its allies have subjected the rebel-held enclave of Ghouta near Damascus to one of the heaviest bombardments of the seven-year war, killing hundreds.
(Excerpt) Read more at jpost.com ...
Well they used them, so now what Britain?
Burden of Damascus (Isaiah 17)
End Times Ping! Let me know if you want on or off.
“Well they used them, so now what Britain?”
Where’s the proof? Some pictures on the internet? I seem to remember something about WMDs we just had to take out in Iraq.
Here we go
Al Qaeda must be losing
Time for yet another false flag
Anyone with access to water treatment plants or any other number of industrial chemical storage sites can get chlorine
And seizing water plants has been status quo for islamist terrorist militias holding civilian populations as human shields
Don’t forget about the lie by CNN that Saddam’s troops were murdering babies in Kuwait.
Get the US out of that mess! If Muslims want to kill each other, that’s not our problem. If Russia and Turkey want to be tangled up in this, that is also not our problem. I don’t get it. Assad may be the only sane Muslim leader in the world.
False flag refers to covert operations designed to deceive; the deception creates the appearance of a particular party (group or nation) being responsible for some activity, disguising the actual source of responsibility.
Join the party! There’s already about 15 different combatants operating in Syria. The more the merrier.
Must be something in it for Britain. I would rather us stay out of it. There’s no proof. Taking Asaad out would be a mistake Like Iraq.
Exactly. I’ve been hearing about the Middle East violence since the 80s and nothing has changed.
I never understood that it was okay to use fire bombs to burn people to death but not chemical weapons.
If so, that would make both the US and UK the Al Qaeda air force since Al Qaeda has the chems & is using them in a false flag operation.
The gas attacks are 100% fake. This is just an excuse to attack Assad, the neocon goal all along.
Almost a year after we Tomahawked the Syrian air base that was flying missions against ISIS with 59 cruise missiles, General Mattis admitted that the US has no reliable evidence that the Syrian government used sarin in Khan Sheihkhoun (an Al Qaeda stronghold).
Basically, the US military still badly wants to fly top cover for ISIS and the jihadis every time the Syrian army attacks them. This is our national shame.
Trump’s foreign policy appears to have been hijacked in Syria. He said many times before, and again last week, that our only mission in Syria is to defeat ISIS and then we will leave.
Today, General Votel told the House defense committee we’re staying in Syria for a long time. I didn’t vote for General Votel and don’t want him or other Pentagon/CIA types making these decisions.
And THAT is why Flynn had to go and be replaced by neocon hacks like Mattis and McMaster.
Indeed, and like Libya. What a five star disaster that is, thanks to Obama.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.