Posted on 03/05/2018 3:26:22 PM PST by Morgana
West Virginians will have the chance to vote on a constitutional amendment that makes it clear that their state does not recognize abortion as a “right.”
On Monday, the state House of Delegates passed the proposed constitutional amendment in a 72-25 vote, WVVA News reports. The ballot measure, which does not require the governor’s approval, passed the state Senate in February.
West Virginia Senate Joint Resolution 12 will be on the ballot in November. If approved by voters, the following would be added to the state Constitution: “Nothing in this Constitution secures or protects a right to abortion or requires the funding of an abortion.”
The amendment would make it easier for the state to pass pro-life laws, including a restriction on taxpayer funding for abortions. West Virginia is one of 17 states that funds elective abortions for low-income women through Medicaid.
Pro-life advocates hope the amendment will help reverse a 1993 state Supreme Court decision forcing taxpayers to pay for elective abortions.
“This would allow the Legislature to essentially override that decision without any ambiguity,” said state Sen. Robert Karnes, previously. “This will make it absolutely clear that it’s constitutional for those things to pass.”
Since 1977, state taxpayers have been forced to pay millions of dollars for tens of thousands unborn babies’ abortion deaths, according to West Virginians for Life. In 2017 alone, state taxpayers paid for 1,560 unborn babies to be aborted through Medicaid, according to state health data.
West Virginians for Life said in a statement to LifeNews:
On March 5, the WV House passed SJR 12 by a greater than two-thirds margin (73-26) making it Amendment 1 on the November 6 ballot. Amendment 1 will return the state Constitution to a neutral position on abortion and abortion funding, thereby taking the control of abortion funding from the court system and putting it in the hands of the people’s elected representatives where it belongs.
The state Constitution, in 1993, was wrongly changed by the Panepinto Decision, which required state taxpayers to pay for women’s elective abortions in West Virginia. Amendment 1 simply eliminates the influence of the Panepinto Decision so the restriction on funding of abortion is reinstated in the form it was in 1993, unless the WV Legislature passes an updated law.
Under Amendment 1, a woman’s right to abortion will not be affected in any way.
“If this amendment is ratified by the voters in November, women will still have access to abortion under the Federal Constitution. The Supreme Court in 1973 ruled that the Federal Constitution contains the right to abortion. States cannot over-ride that ruling with their own Constitutional Amendments,” said Dr. Wanda Franz, WVFL president.
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that abortion is a right under the U.S. Constitution. In Harris vs. McRae, the Supreme Court ruled that the abortion right does not provide for a government entitlement, that is, the WV Legislature is free to prohibit abortion funding.
SUPPORT PRO-LIFE NEWS! Please help LifeNews.com with a donation to share the pro-life message in 2018
“West Virginia is one of only 17 states that funds abortion on demand. If Amendment 1 is ratified by the voters in November, then West Virginia will join 33 other states and the federal government in limiting taxpayer funding of abortion,” said WVFL Legislative Liaison Karen Cross. “We know that limiting abortion funding saves lives. In fact, 2 million people are alive today because of the federal Hyde Amendment.”
Over the years the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources (DHHR) reports that West Virginia taxpayers have spent nearly $10,000,000 on approximately 35,000 abortions. Most of those were elective abortions for any reason.
“If Panepinto is reversed, the law on which it was based would be reinstated. The 1993 law allowed for taxpayer funding of abortion to save the life of the mother, in cases of rape and incest, for fetal anomaly and medical emergency,” Franz added.
Polls consistently show that most Americans do not want their tax dollars to pay for abortions. A Marist poll found that more than two-thirds of Americans oppose taxpayer funding of abortions, including a majority of women and people who identify as pro-choice.
In October 2016, a Politico/Harvard University poll also found that just 36 percent of likely voters supported taxpayer funding for abortions, while 58 percent opposed it.
Almost Heaven, West Virginia...
Hope this turns out well.
It should readily be approved in WVA.
Good wedge issue against Democrat Joe Manchin, out of touch with the mood in a GOP state.
Passed as a constitutional amendment in Tennessee in 2014. Of course they tried every trick in the book to try to get the results thrown out, but it still stands.
Good
Unborn baby Sanctuary State.
Watch some POS federal judge smack it down. Even though it’s OK for states to pass laws that infringe on the 2nd.
I like it!
Is this the beginning of an Amendment process via the states? Good luck. Get ready for the demagoguery and lies.
You mean they might not be able to murder and cut up little babies?!!!
Perfectly stated.
States are rebelling by instituting sanctuary cities.
It would be great for states to rebel by banning abortion.
>
Is this the beginning of an Amendment process via the states? Good luck. Get ready for the demagoguery and lies.
>
Rather them state clearly, often and LOUDLY, “Per the 9th & 10th A., NO. Fedzilla/Courts? FOAD.”
Sorry, but just more legalize/verbiage when the clear, plain English already exists.
Tell the POS judge to enforce it himself/herself/itself.
It’s long past time to smack these idiots back into their proper public SERVANT place.
Thanks Morgana.
THANK YOU, West Virginia, Mountain Momma!
Texas now needs to pass an ABORTION BAN! We will just tell the Libtard “Judges” we are a Sanctuary State for the UNBORN!
Even so, get ready for the demagoguery and lies. Remember the Gogins from Pete’s Dragon? You are all Gogins now in the MSM. Put it up for a US constitutional amendment, too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.